-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
.thumb.gif.f35aad759896324c3e174efcba5a66a6.gif)
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
By Harbingers · Posted
I have not read this yet as it was just posted. I’ll see if there is any juicy details and post them up. -
By NorthTryon · Posted
And the QB before Rattler was worse! People are like well he only had one year of production. Analysts and malcontents always move the goal posts when they want. -
The 5th year allows tons of leverage when it comes to new contract talks. It's like having 20% more control of a contract. It allows cheaper numbers, cause well you have that 5years compared to 4. Plus you also have 6th, 7th, and 8th(I think) tagged years. Sure the QB doesn't play on it, but it allows teams to lower their offers given the years of control. The deal with penix is he's also old too, so that 3rd year he's going to be 26/7 unlike 23. You are also looking at the best side that penix can play and needs a new contract. It could easily be he's a bust and thus wasted this important era. The failcons should be comfy in the playoffs barring injuries. Now they missed on adding a edge making a key sack in the playoffs, to having spend the 8th overall on josh Rosen. Honestly they should have drafted Rome Odunze. Pitts, Robinson, Allgeier, London, with a *healthy cousins.....that's 5/6 big problems for defenses. Most days they'd be able to drop 40. Im super happy they didn't, but ask again in 3 years and I may regret.....
-
-
(1).thumb.gif.c991ead14106875ce4bbb9e20baa4b88.gif)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.