Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bieniemy apparently out of the running in Houston


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, WarHeel said:

These morons still haven’t figured out the difference between equity and equality but are comfortable calling people racists based on factual information because it hurts their feelings.

What the fug does your statement have to do with anything? Don't hide behind useless verboseness!

In practical terms--in reality--the only way that oppressed peoples will have equity is when society starts giving (showing) them equality!

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

What the fug does your statement have to do with anything? Don't hide behind useless verboseness!

In practical terms--in reality--the only way that oppressed peoples will have equity is when society starts giving (showing) them equality!

Everyone should have equal opportunity to do whatever the hell they want to do. It’s a great thing that in the year 2021 Americans can do just that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WarHeel said:

Everyone should have equal opportunity to do whatever the hell they want to do. It’s a great thing that in the year 2021 Americans can do just that.

You're right! And if everyone were on a level playing field, that would be fuging wonderful and incredible! But that's not the case! Don't lie and say that it is!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Side Note: If the Texans were to choose Leslie Frazier, our old buddy Eric Washington could be in line for a defensive coordinator job again.

I don't know that it'd be a good idea, but hey...

Please let this happen.  The only thing better would be for him the be the dc in dc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

You're right! And if everyone were on a level playing field, that would be fuging wonderful and incredible! But that's not the case! Don't lie and say that it is!

Not everyone starts on an even playing field. That really sucks. But everyone is afforded the same opportunities. Some will have to pay a higher expense or work much harder for it but the opportunities are there nonetheless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

LMFAO!

This is why I hardly ever go to the TB. I have little patience for people who try to skirt around the issue of racism by giving all kinds of reasons why this case and that case can't possibly be the result of systemic racism. 

I'll tell you like I tell anyone else; the data in this country tells a story. That's why I like Andrew Yang who is data-driven. His solutions are data-driven and fully in tune with what's happening in the 21st century as opposed to the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries. But, getting back on point, blacks in this country come out on the negative end of the spectrum--the short end of the stick--by just about every social and economic measure that you can think of  (e.g. infant mortality, home ownership, education and higher education, incarceration, loan rates, ability to get loans, communities subject to questionable environmental conditions, covid-19 deaths, wages, etc.) If you want to pretend that this is not the direct result of systemic racism and oppression, that's your choice, but this tells me all that I need to know about you in your regards to a sense of fairness, justice, empathy, and morality.

Now I'm not saying that maybe this isn't currently the issue with the Texans and Bienemy. On its face, you could say that since the Texans appear to be on the way to hiring a black coach, that racism plays no part in this. But looking at the reported issues surrounding the owner and reasons that Deshaun Watson is disgruntled, and the appearance that it seems as though the Texans are trying to make Watson happy and/or at least save face under the pressure of his anger, I'd suggest that there is at least a chance that racism has indirectly played a part in all of this, just like it continues to be pervasive in many social and economic sectors in this country, as reflected by the data. 

Lastly, if you believe that blacks are on the negative end of the spectrum on pretty much all the measurements because blacks actually are inferior, then you're a racist, point blank!

Litterbox, if you want to lose brain cells, its perfect. I can not speak on on current events there, as I never visit (once in years). With trying not to make this thread into one, 100% blacks where given the "short stick" many years ago. I said this even then and for sure now, Id rather be black in America than anywhere else. Its like no one traveled before, dear god I wish some could to get a real dose.  I do not feel Eric has gotten "short-stick"  cause of his skin color, especially with the amount of interviews. Something is happening with the process, that turns owners/GMs cold. Spit ballin- maybe hes blunt and too honest.  Maybe like Joe Brady he has a weak list of hires. One of my  construction guys had a saying about those who complained about hiring process-" You have to be employable".

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If someone wanted to make the argument that nepotism was the biggest problem black coaches face when it comes to breaking into the HC ranks that's actually more believable than simply black coaches aren't good enough.

As it stands now though the usual suspects want us to believe black coaches are being treated fairly and just aren't built to lead and it's white defensive backs getting discriminated against and well, I guess that's to be expected in a topic like this.

Someone even found a way to complain about "fake handouts" and "indoctrination" while doing it. Heel still can't explain why black players and coaches disagree with his assumptions that head coaching opportunities is a merit based system when clearly it isn't. I can totally see how possibly owners might be more comfortable with white coaches and it's not a malicious thing but a subconscious bias thing, but trying to divorce race from this conversation is just weird. Or maybe it's intentional since it's a pattern for one of you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

Not everyone starts on an even playing field. That really sucks. But everyone is afforded the same opportunities. Some will have to pay a higher expense or work much harder for it but the opportunities are there nonetheless. 

I think that's a bald-faced lie, but let's say that it's tue, it sounds like some are privileged and some are not, and sounds like you are happy with that status quo. Typical!

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

If someone wanted to make the argument that nepotism was the biggest problem black coaches face when it comes to breaking into the HC ranks that's actually more believable than simply black coaches aren't good enough.

As it stands now though the usual suspects want us to believe black coaches are being treated fairly and just aren't built to lead and it's white defensive backs getting discriminated against and well, I guess that's to be expected in a topic like this.

Someone even found a way to complain about "fake handouts" and "indoctrination" while doing it. Heel still can't explain why black players and coaches disagree with his assumptions that head coaching opportunities is a merit based system when clearly it isn't. I can totally see how possibly owners might be more comfortable with white coaches and it's not a malicious thing but a subconscious bias thing, but trying to divorce race from this conversation is just weird. Or maybe it's intentional since it's a pattern for one of you. 

How many black HC need to be hired? You never answered my question about who you'd hire. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

I think that's a bald-faced lie, but let's say that it's tue, it sounds like some are privileged and some are not, and sounds like you are happy with that status quo. Typical!

My definition aligns with the classic definition of privilege in that it is not bound by the color of your skin. Compared to my mother who grew up in the projects I grew up privileged. Compared to me a lot of my Caucasian friends grew up privileged. Not because they are white but because of the opportunities afforded them based on their head start. But at the end of the day they had to make the decision to not fug up their head start just like my mother had to make the decision to join the military and better herself otherwise fall in line with the family history of poverty and self-loathing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Basbear said:

How many black HC need to be hired? You never answered my question about who you'd hire. 

I didn't answer it bc it really doesn't matter. I don't know, maybe one out of the seven vacancies which all passed over black people? But at this point it'd be ridiculous to force it in Houston bc they already screwed their process bc their owners is a dummy. And it'll always be looked at as a token hire regardless despite the fact that if black coaches were treated fairly and actually given fair opportunity (which is the main point of all this) we wouldn't need the rooney rule and we wouldn't be having this discussion to begin with. Not sure why that's controversial but it offends folks like Warheel who thinks everyone gets the same opportunities and rejects data which proves him wrong lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WarHeel said:

My definition aligns with the classic definition of privilege in that it is not bound by the color of your skin. Compared to my mother who grew up in the projects I grew up privileged. Compared to me a lot of my Caucasian friends grew up privileged. Not because they are white but because of the opportunities afforded them based on their head start. But at the end of the day they had to make the decision to not fug up their head start just like my mother had to make the decision to join the military and better herself otherwise fall in line with the family history of poverty and self-loathing. 

Denial of history and denial of social and economic data that indeed does reflect that racial discrimination is still very pervasive in America and that it is still very much causitive and effective of negative results (some having their origins at the birth of this nation) is ignorant and/or morally unacceptable! In other words, it's racist! Point blank!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ImaginaryKev said:

I didn't answer it bc it really doesn't matter. I don't know, maybe one out of the seven vacancies which all passed over black people? But at this point it'd be ridiculous to force it in Houston bc they already screwed their process bc their owners is a dummy. And it'll always be looked at as a token hire regardless despite the fact that if black coaches were treated fairly and actually given fair opportunity (which is the main point of all this) we wouldn't need the rooney rule and we wouldn't be having this discussion to begin with. Not sure why that's controversial but it offends folks like Warheel who thinks everyone gets the same opportunities and rejects data which proves him wrong lol

Once again, who’s offended?

Any data derived from this discussion has roots that extend decades. I see the point but it’s not enough to generalize entire populations to fit into the tiny narrative that life isn’t fair because of the color of your skin in this country in the year 2021. As other posters have mentioned, travel outside the country and you’ll realize how wonderful we all have it here. Stop drinking the media kool-aid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
    • The defense has pulled that feat off this season though.  Multiple times. offense has not had a single good first half all season.  Only and good opening scripted drive paired with disappointing play.  defense has been the actual unit you can measure real and consistent improvement IMO.  Still holes and flaws to it that aren’t going away until new bodies get here but they really are the story of the season IMO
    • One thing about RB's and LB's is they are going to get hurt. It's inevitable. Having a fresh Chuba is not a bad thing.  My only criticism of this entire situation is that I wish our staff would adjust personnel to matchup a little better. I think Chuba is a lot better than Rico against the stacked boxes we've seen the last two weeks. They are very different backs with very different strengths, and I love them both. Rico is so good at identifying the hole early, and hitting it full speed early. He's much better at breaking the big run. Chuba is a much more patient back, and finds 3 yards when there's nothing there better than Rico.  It's in no way a criticism of either, but I think Chuba would have had more success than Rico the way the Saints and Falcons attacked us from a Defensive standpoint.  When you put 9 in the box, often times there is no hole to attack. 
×
×
  • Create New...