Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's happening. (Probably)


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

Is the smart move now to sign Trubiski and draft a QB, trade Bridgewater to SF?  Saving $10 m to trade TB, and that is about what (I think) Trubiski might sign for--(guessing).

Smart and Signing Trubisky for 10m don't belong in the same sentence. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

if i had a gun to my head and had to guess what was going on, id say that this is a POS front office/ownership trying to fug over a player on his way out. 

 

When in reality its just driving his price down..    doesn't logically make sense for them to do that..  which is why i think the texans, or actually the friends of that POS owner, are doing this. 

 

 

Timing is sus, but why on earth would they be behind lowering his value?? Wouldnt the opposite be better?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I'm not suggesting Whiny Watson is guilty of anything...

...but the Huddle Court of Opinion certainly is giving him a complete pass vs. any other player (or executive) in recent times who has been accused of anything remotely close to this!

Hmm, I wonder why....??

I think you might be simplifying the Huddle's perspective so you can build a case against your argument.  I see mixed emotions, some waiting.  Antonio Brown?  Well, he had pleaded guilty of burglary a year before he was accused and it did not involve the possible future of the Panthers.  Other things were coming out about Brown that suggested problems in the ole noggin.  Watson has been the all American boy made good, and the day bad news breaks about him, you seem shocked that people would want to reserve judgement.  No warning signs.  So these are different scenarios altogether, but your system of logic is exposed, not Huddlers, in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I can't believe there are actually people who are against us acquiring a young franchise QB like Watson. You guys are still stuck in the Jerry Richardson mindset of how to build a team.

All the stud RBs, pass rushers, and successful 1st round picks we've had since 2002 and yet if you take out the one pick that was a franchise QB (Cam) we'd have gotten nothing for all of them.

Without a QB, nothing else matters. With one, you have a shot. Yes, you have to build around him, but without one to build around you might as well forfeit every game because you're never going to be more than average unless you can somehow manage to put together an all-time great defense, which is practically impossible these days between the rules and the salary cap.

Why take out Cam, hes a great example of what happens when you can not protect your QB. Watson going to block the whole OL himself? You ok with putting a elite QB(that you just gave valuable assets for) behind a OL of UDFAs/veteran minimum types? How many games can this team win while Watson is on IR? Cam was here and recently too, he could only handle so much. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Smart and Signing Trubisky for 10m don't belong in the same sentence. 

Do you know that he won 6 games and lost 3 on an 8-8 team and completed 67% of his passes?  Do you know much about the Bears OL?  The WRs and running game?

You see, if you sign him, you are already better than TB and you still go after drafting a QB.

It is not Watson--I get it--but you must learn to comprehend that there are things in this world that are smart even if you do not think they are.  Nobody knows how Trubiski will do in another system with good WRs--not me--and not you.  So cut the chest pounding crap and learn how to consider all possible options without getting those panties in a wad.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

its the owner trying to get one over on an MVP QB that screw them over. 

 

its so easy in todays cancel culture

I dont see why, when he could get sooo much in return for him. Like buying a home and the agent says "well yea they only had either 8 or 10 people murder here"...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...