Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sounds like Jets' 2nd pick is open for business...?


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Just a general observation my man. Every time you encounter the slightest pushback on one of your opinions this is how it plays out.

And every time someone says a player might be good you want folks to calm down. We're gonna have a draft this year to find new players, no matter how scared you are to have expectations and how low the bar is you set for them

Edited by ImaginaryKev
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

I would be happy with any scenario that has us drafting someone not named Mac Jones. Drafting Jones screams desperation from the front office. 
 

but yeah sign me up for fields 

Someone is going to draft him in the first round, I'll tell you that much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Wish I could say the same.

(I'm clearly too cautious to be an NFL GM) 😄

I'll jump on board with whoever we take. I suppose how big a jump that takes depends on the pick.

Kyler Murray, Deshaun Watson, Jared Goff, and Marcus Mariota were all guys that were labeled with durability concerns, but they have all mostly stayed healthy even if two of them suck lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Verge said:

Kyler Murray, Deshaun Watson, Jared Goff, and Marcus Mariota were all guys that were labeled with durability concerns, but they have all mostly stayed healthy even if two of them suck lol

Fair enough.

I know the flipside is also true sometimes. Lord knows nobody thought Dan Morgan had durability concerns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I just gotta laugh, man.

Lol I'm laughing too bc you seeked out an argument, I gave it to you, now you're commenting on my willingness to argue. On a message board. You clearly care abt this place too much too (you're a mod, of course). People are territorial as hell here, I don't mind arguing. 

But I do note your observations of me since you seem to dislike my tone when I actually argue my positions here. Which I thought was the point, since this is a discussion board. I'll be nicer, promise. 

Edited by ImaginaryKev
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

(I'm clearly too cautious to be an NFL GM) 😄

 

Can't afford to be passive or cautious when it comes to QB. If you have a guy, go get your guy no matter the cost. Any other strategy is pretty well doomed to fail.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Verge said:

Can't afford to be passive or cautious when it comes to QB. If you have a guy, go get your guy no matter the cost. Any other strategy is pretty well doomed to fail.

Probably true.

I would say I have zero reservations about Wilson's skill set. When I've watched him play, he's been fantastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ImaginaryKev said:

Lol I'm laughing too bc you seeked out an argument, I gave it to you, now you're commenting on my willingness to argue. On a message board. You clearly care abt this place too much too (you're a mod, of course). People are territorial as hell here, I don't mind arguing. 

But I do note your observations of me since you seem to dislike my tone when I actually argue my positions here. Which I thought was the point, since this is a discussion board. I'll be nicer, promise. 

I agree with you they're good prospects. You always mischaracterize others' disagreements and play this victim crap while downplaying the absurdity of your original claim by acting like you were simply indicating that you think a guy is going to be good. My only disagreement is that their floor is obviously not that of a legit NFL MVP candidate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Verge said:

Can't afford to be passive or cautious when it comes to QB. If you have a guy, go get your guy no matter the cost. Any other strategy is pretty well doomed to fail.

Verge are you hearing the Jets may be willing to stick with Darnold and trade #2?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I agree with you they're good prospects. You always mischaracterize others' disagreements and play this victim crap while downplaying the absurdity of your original claim by acting like you were simply indicating that you think a guy is going to be good. My only disagreement is that their floor is obviously not that of a legit NFL MVP candidate.

Aww

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So what is more important? what he did on the Saints the year before last or how he compares to a ROOKIE who clearly had problems adjusting to the LEAGUE last year on another team and it effecting win/losses? smh And you say im all over the place.  Also, i clearly gave explanations for how the seattle game played out. Its rare a qb has to throw the ball 63 times so to think it would have been a theme for the season is ludicrous... the even bigger point is that its not necessarily his fault if he has to do it in the first place like he was calling the plays but for some strange reason you continue to hold that against Dalton as if its all on him and not the guys around him racking up penalties. If he is old terrible as you say it shouldnt matter how bad the defense was he played, he shouldnt have been able to throw for over 300 yds on them with no turnovers. But this is the narratives people pushed all season, why didnt bryce turn around and destroy and even worse defense against a winless vikings the next week? Do i need to layout how dumb this logic is even more?
    • I love to bash them for this move but its smart..  They have a team that can win the NFCS this year, but yet they are picking in the top 10 now.  Cousins contract is really only a 2 year deal. So Penix can sit and learn with no pressure for 2 years and in year 3 when Cousins guaranteed money is over they can plug in Penix.  If they were not in a position to win the South this year then I think this would have been bad trade, but its smart and they can afford it. 
    • Already noticing differences At least this year, we did not see photos of Xavier hugging Mrs. Tepper (even if others were hugged, it simply suggests owner involvement on a premature level, imo)--there were no cute news conferences wherein the head coach jokes about drafting a RB because he had a good game against Baylor and his wife told him to; There are not recordings of the head coach calling a long snapper and trying to convince him that he is being drafted and not pranked.    In other words, I get the feeling that the GM was actually able to do his job this year--we shall see. 
×
×
  • Create New...