Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sounds like Jets' 2nd pick is open for business...?


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Just a general observation my man. Every time you encounter the slightest pushback on one of your opinions this is how it plays out.

And every time someone says a player might be good you want folks to calm down. We're gonna have a draft this year to find new players, no matter how scared you are to have expectations and how low the bar is you set for them

Edited by ImaginaryKev
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

I would be happy with any scenario that has us drafting someone not named Mac Jones. Drafting Jones screams desperation from the front office. 
 

but yeah sign me up for fields 

Someone is going to draft him in the first round, I'll tell you that much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Wish I could say the same.

(I'm clearly too cautious to be an NFL GM) 😄

I'll jump on board with whoever we take. I suppose how big a jump that takes depends on the pick.

Kyler Murray, Deshaun Watson, Jared Goff, and Marcus Mariota were all guys that were labeled with durability concerns, but they have all mostly stayed healthy even if two of them suck lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Verge said:

Kyler Murray, Deshaun Watson, Jared Goff, and Marcus Mariota were all guys that were labeled with durability concerns, but they have all mostly stayed healthy even if two of them suck lol

Fair enough.

I know the flipside is also true sometimes. Lord knows nobody thought Dan Morgan had durability concerns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I just gotta laugh, man.

Lol I'm laughing too bc you seeked out an argument, I gave it to you, now you're commenting on my willingness to argue. On a message board. You clearly care abt this place too much too (you're a mod, of course). People are territorial as hell here, I don't mind arguing. 

But I do note your observations of me since you seem to dislike my tone when I actually argue my positions here. Which I thought was the point, since this is a discussion board. I'll be nicer, promise. 

Edited by ImaginaryKev
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

(I'm clearly too cautious to be an NFL GM) 😄

 

Can't afford to be passive or cautious when it comes to QB. If you have a guy, go get your guy no matter the cost. Any other strategy is pretty well doomed to fail.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Verge said:

Can't afford to be passive or cautious when it comes to QB. If you have a guy, go get your guy no matter the cost. Any other strategy is pretty well doomed to fail.

Probably true.

I would say I have zero reservations about Wilson's skill set. When I've watched him play, he's been fantastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ImaginaryKev said:

Lol I'm laughing too bc you seeked out an argument, I gave it to you, now you're commenting on my willingness to argue. On a message board. You clearly care abt this place too much too (you're a mod, of course). People are territorial as hell here, I don't mind arguing. 

But I do note your observations of me since you seem to dislike my tone when I actually argue my positions here. Which I thought was the point, since this is a discussion board. I'll be nicer, promise. 

I agree with you they're good prospects. You always mischaracterize others' disagreements and play this victim crap while downplaying the absurdity of your original claim by acting like you were simply indicating that you think a guy is going to be good. My only disagreement is that their floor is obviously not that of a legit NFL MVP candidate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Verge said:

Can't afford to be passive or cautious when it comes to QB. If you have a guy, go get your guy no matter the cost. Any other strategy is pretty well doomed to fail.

Verge are you hearing the Jets may be willing to stick with Darnold and trade #2?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I agree with you they're good prospects. You always mischaracterize others' disagreements and play this victim crap while downplaying the absurdity of your original claim by acting like you were simply indicating that you think a guy is going to be good. My only disagreement is that their floor is obviously not that of a legit NFL MVP candidate.

Aww

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can say that I have defended Canales because I get that they are doing all they can to keep from looking like idiots for drafting Bryce, from the trade up to signing $150m guards to drafting XL and Brooks etc---nothing seems to work.  And Hiring Canales was part of the Bryce Young rehab program, so so he can't really decide to "move on."  That has to come from Morgan and Tepper. Personally, I think Bryce is due for an injury.  He is small, he is not thick, and he has been a LOT more healthy than most any other QB has who has endured so much pressure.  The thing that bothers me is this---Bryce really does not go through his progressions quickly.  He locks on to his presnap read and stays locked onto him for too long--he seems to fail to anticipate the WR/TE's positioning on the play before the cut--for example, if the WR is running a dig and the CB has his back to the inside of the field, he should be open for a second or less just after the cut.  He seems to wait until the cut has been made before deciding, then checking down quickly while moving in the pocket. OL:  There seems to be a lack of communication--is that on Mays?  Watch this team presnap--they seem a bit confused at times.   I can almost predict the success rate of the play by watching the center and QB before the snap.  
    • Anyone else remember back in 2010 when Fox piloted having music under the in-game replays during one of Carolina's games? Not the commercial bumpers but the actual replay clips that the announcers would talk over. Pretty sure it was vs the 49ers. And it was terrible. Point being, Carolina continues being so bad that we get the networks trying things out during their games.
    • Is it bad I found this video more hilarious than pathetic? I am still laughing at that one play where half the people on the field ran into each other and Bryce still couldn't see Chuba wide open... Also laughing at Cade blocking nobody and somehow losing his cleat Man this offense is a poo show
×
×
  • Create New...