Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gunslinger or Game Manager


Gunslinger or Game Manager  

69 members have voted

  1. 1. Which would you Rather Have?

    • Gunslinger
      60
    • Game Manager
      9


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

A game manager who will sling the ball down field with managed aggression if you allow him to (and many times, even when you don't).

Again, this goes back to people thinking that "game manager" means "doesn't take risks".

That's false.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic made me think about KC.

  Alex Smith is a consummate game manager.  Move the sticks consistently and take calculated risk shots downfield.  Then Mahommes came to town spurs jangling.  Patrick is a gunslinger.  

In his prime Stafford with Megatron helping him out was a big armed gunslinger.  Goff at his best seems to be a efficient game manager.  It's funny that LA and Detroit essentially swapped styles of QB. 

Me personally after a year of TB and years of Ron/ Shula vanilla old school offense give me that gunslinger.  Burrow and Brady lit the college ranks up not too long ago.  Even with TB's limitations three 1000 yrd receivers was a good sign.  Let Brady and Thule find their guy.  Bridgewater has the intangibles and has NFL talent but he also should be a cautionary tale of over valuing the "game manager".  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mickeye76 said:

This topic made me think about KC.

  Alex Smith is a consummate game manager.  Move the sticks consistently and take calculated risk shots downfield.  Then Mahommes came to town spurs jangling.  Patrick is a gunslinger.  

In his prime Stafford with Megatron helping him out was a big armed gunslinger.  Goff at his best seems to be a efficient game manager.  It's funny that LA and Detroit essentially swapped styles of QB. 

Me personally after a year of TB and years of Ron/ Shula vanilla old school offense give me that gunslinger.  Burrow and Brady lit the college ranks up not too long ago.  Even with TB's limitations three 1000 yrd receivers was a good sign.  Let Brady and Thule find their guy.  Bridgewater has the intangibles and has NFL talent but he also should be a cautionary tale of over valuing the "game manager".  

The problem is TB (our version) is risk averse.  He is a game manager to an extreme. 

I saw Joe Gibbs in his second stint do that to Jason Campbell.  Nobody will ever know what Campbell might have been, because his first few years Gibbs drilled into him some version of "whatever you do, just don't throw an interception."  The guy never really got over that. 

Not sure how TB got to that point, but  he certainly looks that way.  It is also possible he is not averse to throwing interceptions as much as the clock in his head goes off early.  With our OL, that was a pretty safe bet since we were mediocre at protecting him with a 2.5 second time to throw.

It is not a matter of overvaluing game management in a QB, it is a QB that wanders from game management to risk avoidance, whether it be from interceptions of being hit at the 2.55 second mark.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Most, if not all, QBs worth a damn are game managers, and every QB takes risks.

I prefer game managers, but I don't know if I'd go that far.

Favre and Elway both won rings. Bradshaw won four of 'em.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

The problem is TB (our version) is risk averse.  He is a game manager to an extreme. 

I saw Joe Gibbs in his second stint do that to Jason Campbell.  Nobody will ever know what Campbell might have been, because his first few years Gibbs drilled into him some version of "whatever you do, just don't throw an interception."  The guy never really got over that. 

Not sure how TB got to that point, but  he certainly looks that way.  It is also possible he is not averse to throwing interceptions as much as the clock in his head goes off early.  With our OL, that was a pretty safe bet since we were mediocre at protecting him with a 2.5 second time to throw.

It is not a matter of overvaluing game management in a QB, it is a QB that wanders from game management to risk avoidance, whether it be from interceptions of being hit at the 2.55 second mark.

We had a similar thing here. Rip Scherer tried to turn Jake Delhomme into a game manager. That just wasn't gonna happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indulging my inner nerd for a moment, remember the Star Trek episode where Captain Kirk got split into his "good self" and his "bad self", and then his good self struggled to make hard decisions?

Bridgewater's "bad self" probably got coached out of him at some point (assuming it existed).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Indulging my inner nerd for a moment, remember the Star Trek episode where Captain Kirk got split into his "good self" and his "bad self", and then his good self struggled to make hard decisions?

Bridgewater's "bad self" probably got coached out of him at some point (assuming it existed).

It could also be an offshoot of the knee injury.  Brady's knee injury was clearly in his mind (based on his reactions to getting hit) for a long time, and he was playing every week after he recovered to come to terms with it.  Imagine a worse injury and playing a handful of games over a few seasons afterwards.

I really can't say what that would do to a player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point about over valuing Teddy was we were hoping for the one the Saints got for a couple games.  Also the familiarity with the system and his potential as a mentor for the eventual successor all looked good on paper.  For whatever reason ( the oline allowing early pressure, the loss of CMC) that plan is scrapped.  So I vote gunslinger. Different route.  The fact we went after Stafford and Watson makes me think I'm not the only one. 

   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I prefer game managers, but I don't know if I go that far.

Favre and Elway both won rings. Bradshaw won four of 'em.

My point really is that the term "game manager" is somewhat nebulous and will vary depending upon who you are talking to. 

In my mind a "gunslinger" is one who has the goods, knows he has the goods, and is not afraid to pull the trigger when the opportunity arises, and does it with success more times than not.  

Edited by top dawg
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I understand the concerns--he is not P. Sewell or Joe Thomas.  He has technique issues and was not great in the run game and was good in pass protection when UGA did not pass much.  Then there is the immediate need vs long term need perspective.   I did not see Freeland being there-frankly. Here is why:   He has nearly 35" arms and his hands are large (10.5").  He ran a 4.93 40 at the combine.  He is very agile.  His vertical was 33.5".   Physically, he is a freak. He is 21 and he seems very intelligent (coachable). You have to remember, some of these rookies are 24, 25 years old. Freeling is A team player.  His shortcomings are fixable.  Short arms (as with the kids from Utah and Miami) are not fixable.  The Run on OTs began at #9: Fano (picked 10 picks earlier) has 32" arms and his hands are 9".  He did not play in the SEC like Freeling.  Many think the short arms project him to guard. Mauigoa (picked 10th) has 33" arms.  He is a solid player, but his arms make him borderline as a T (they seek 34" and up as ideal)  Kayden Proctor (picked 12th overall) struggled in pass protection and projects by many to RT or G.  Weight management is a concern. So it is possible that Freeling will be the first LT taken who actually plays LT.  (he also has the ability and experience to play RT)  His questions are fixable and not limited to physical limitations.  Here is the question:  If you know that you need a Tackle, and you could choose between all four of these players, who would you pick? I am not sure that Freeling would not be the player I selected if given the opportunity to take any of them.
    • The more I think about this pick the more I like it. The Icky injury might end up being a blessing in disguise for everyone except Icky unfortunately. If Freeling pans out at LT the Panthers have a good player on a rookie contract at a premium position at a time when they’re going to need to potentially pay Bryce for his next contract. Icky was likely going to command a big salary jump for his next contract and now, there’s a strong justification he’s not going to be worth a big money extension until he rehabs and proves he can still play at a high level. Since he’s finishing his rookie deal this season, it will be interesting to see if the Panthers bring him back for the 2027 season. Obviously it’s too early to say and they will probably wait to see how the season pans out with Moton still elite but aging and clearly battling persistent injuries, and they need to see if Freeling can develop into a starter during his rookie year. But ultimately this might have opened up a huge chunk of salary cap for the next 4-5 years. 
    • You read my mind Nastradamus! If Rodriguez is still there I feel like it will be hard to pass on him. And one of these TE we keep drafting have to hit eventually and Delp is just as good as the others.
×
×
  • Create New...