Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gonzaga is going to destroy....


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Definitely think Baylor would give them a fight, but they are the favorites for sure

 

20 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Baylor wins it all IMO.  Those dudes look like they love a good fight.  

Baylor vs. Houston will be interesting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WUnderhill said:

We should have had an NCAA tournament discussion in here from the start. I have no idea what all this butthurt is about.

It sort of flies in the face of the structure of the site. There are literally forums specifically for those kinds of discussions. 

It went away in pandemic because it wasn't like football news was going to be a thing.

It also gets more lax in the offseason. But not usually this lax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

It sort of flies in the face of the structure of the site. There are literally forums specifically for those kinds of discussions. 

It went away in pandemic because it wasn't like football news was going to be a thing.

It also gets more lax in the offseason. But not usually this lax.

I think there used to be a college bball forum, but I haven’t seen it in a while. Is it just me? Plus, everybody knows how hard it is to have an engaging thread in the non Panthers forums because so many fewer people browse. NC is the Mecca of college bball, it’s kind of silly not to engage the huddle as much as possible around the tournament. But then I guess maybe the huddle just isn’t making enough money and nobody cares.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...