Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What are we doing in the draft?


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jared Patterson said:

Who do you expect or hear is talking to the Jets about Sam Darnold? I am interested because that would rule out one team trying to trade up. 

I'm not 100% they take a QB. I am also not sure they don't want to keep both QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Works for me though if I'm nitpicking I'd prefer to flip flop #3 and #4.

It depends. If Sewell or Slater are there at 8 and all the QBs gone I wouldn't want to trade down. If the top guys are gone already then sure trade back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Verge said:

There are two CBs that would justify a top 10 pick IMO

But in the scenario given 5 QBs get drafted before our pick, right?   Chase, Pitts, Sewell, etc all on the board?  I just think they are in a slightly different tier.   It’s not that I don’t like Surtain though.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also Verge, when you say trade to 6 to get ahead of the Football team and the Broncos... are you not expecting either of those teams to try to trade up with Atlanta or would that cost too much, conversely Atlanta may not want to trade with Pitts sitting there? I know for a fact with Arthur Smith there he will want Pitts. He loves using the TE in his offense and Pitts is different. (They've also talked to him multiple times.)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Jared Patterson said:

Also Verge, when you say trade to 6 to get ahead of the Football team and the Broncos... are you not expecting either of those teams to try to trade up with Atlanta or would that cost too much, conversely Atlanta may not want to trade with Pitts sitting there? I know for a fact with Arthur Smith there he will want Pitts. He loves using the TE in his offense and Pitts is different. (They've also talked to him multiple times.)

Don’t think Atlanta is going to want to trade down at all and risk losing out on Pitts 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's funny how the teams with the great QBs stay at or near the top of the league every season.  Yes it is a team game, but the QB has the biggest impact in most NFL football games. 
    • Look, no one is ever a perfect player.  Since the QB handles the ball on 100% of plays offensively (unless there's a direct snap to a RB or something), I can absolutely see where they get an outsized blame and gain from what happens at any given snap of a football game.   Theoretically, there shouldn't even be a stat or idea to a 4th quarter comeback or game winning drive because you should already have done that during the game.  Losers!  Right?  Just because you win late doesn't take away the fact you tried to lose the game for your team! I'm not a fan of that opinion, but again, I'm just a moron with a keyboard.   Bryce has limited tools.  Bryce has not inspired the same level of confidence in us as Cam Newton did in year 3.  I certainly get that.  We traded a TON of assets to get Bryce, and we still suck.  (I mean, since we've lost games, we're losers right?) I completely understand that some fans are just unhappy with a limited QB and a team that isn't performing well, unless the other teams are worse losers than we are. I will say this:  Bryce will fight until the end.  Sure, he's has some real loser football.   But in close games, he's doing his best to comeback (even against a winner of prevent D). Now is it better or worse if your QB plays their best ball in the first half and sucks 2nd half so long as they finish with 300 yards, 3 TDs for your fantasy points? Who said stats are for winners anyway?  The Panthers and Bryce has a long way to go.  I'm enjoying the winning right now.  Though I do start each game thinking "how will we fug this up today?" Because it's been such a poo show in the Tepper era.  Will he prove to be a legit starting NFL QB?  Maybe not here as evidence by our record with QBs who were high draft picks.  
    • Ive never liked the term game winning drives because they include games where the QB was part of or was the reason the team was behind in the first place. Ive been arguing against this stat since the Delhomme years. It should only count when the QB is out of the equation of reasons why the team fell behind in the first place and is at least half the reason why he led the last drive to give them a lead. It shouldnt count if they just hand it off most of the time and the RB is on fire and they go down and score a TD or FG.
×
×
  • Create New...