Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Houston police opening investigation on Deshaun Watson


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

You can't believe either side.  You have to let the facts make the case.  I am not going to believe a woman who is afraid to reveal her name even in confidentiality to the man you are accusing.

@Snake Let me ask you this.  If a woman came in here and said you sexually assaulted her.  Are we supposed to ban you until you are proven innocent or are we supposed to get the facts and make a decision after all the facts are in.

We can't as a society just assume that because a woman or women come out and make a claim against a person.  The case must unfold and both sides need to investigate a prove their case.

I don't know whether he did it or not.  What I find extremely unfair is that so many women came out in 2+ weeks and not a one of them has given their name.  To me they are hiding something.  

I will take this argument up. If a woman came on here how should I react? Should I be aggressive and call her a whore and say her arguments are rumors? Should I go farther and tell her if she didn't get me reinstated I would show nude pictures to every member on this board? Or would I just simply except it because facts will play out. Too many times in the past those just assaulting the victims Morrals and situations has been enough to get the victim to drop the charges not prove innocents. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, joemac said:

The American Way! If you have enough cash you can do whatever you want. This is not a new concept.

What kills me is that half these people convicting Watson in the public court of opinion, voted for a misogynistic cad in 2016 and 2020 (and many of us know why). They talk all the poo about being a patriot, the flag, and the national anthem--even though they twist the hell out of that situation as well with all their straw man arguments--and then they have the nerve to try and question someone's morality. Utter hypocrisy: that's truly the American way! 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

What kills me is that half these people convicting Watson in the public court of opinion, voted for a misogynistic cad in 2016 and 2020 (and many of us know why). They talk all the poo about being a patriot, the flag, and the national anthem--even though they twist the hell out of that situation as well with all their straw man arguments--and then they have the nerve to try and question someone's morality. Utter hypocrisy: that's truly the American way! 

Sweet Jesus dude, thats what we call flailing

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, joemac said:

Are you familiar with the Duke Lacrosse case?

Or the Brett Kavanaugh case?

How did the Kavanaugh case turn out? While the Deshaun case and the Kavanaugh case are totally different the accuser in Kavanaugh was allowed to tell her story without attacks and it came out to be a load of bull. But if we completely dismissed it from the get go and allowed her to be attacked other would have validated her case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Snake said:

How did the Kavanaugh case turn out? While the Deshaun case and the Kavanaugh case are totally different the accuser in Kavanaugh was allowed to tell her story without attacks and it came out to be a load of bull. But if we completely dismissed it from the get go and allowed her to be attacked other would have validated her case. 

Exactly!!!!  Kavanaugh was able to defend himself and knew his accuser.  They were able to show that her story was fabricated.   The difference between Kavanaugh and Watson is that these women are hiding behind a lawyer that wants him convicted before there ever is a trial. 

Reveal the names and let the defense and do their background check.  It's appalling that so many on here are ready to convict just because there are several women making the accusation. 

Once again, I am not saying he is innocent but I am saying they need to allow his lawyers do their due diligence and investigate their backgrounds and come to the truth.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hulu +Live: $88.78 Amazon Prime: $16.00 (w/FanDuel: $36.12) Apple TV+: $10.66 Netflix:$26.68 Is all still $80 less per month than what I was paying for DirecTV when I gave it up a few years ago. 
    • I just don't know that he has the time to turn it around at his age. His age is going to be a major strike against him in the recruiting trail and it's just a tough row to hoe to turn a football program around. One good recruiting class can turn around a basketball team. Hell, one individual recruit can turna around a basketball team - Carmelo Anthony basically won a national championship single handedly at Syracuse. Cam at Auburn is the only college who even comes close to that type of impact off the top of my head. A good recruiting class is 2-3 years down the road from significantly impacting a college football program... if you can actually keep them around. The instant impact is in the portal but everyone else is chasing those guys too. If I was building a college program, I'd focus almost exclusively on the trenches starting out. To me, that's the big difference in college. The better teams dominate the trenches. There's just a LOT more talent disparity at the college level than there is the NFL level. The worst teams in the NFL are still full of guys who were all conference or all American at the college level. The gap between the best team in the NFL and the tenth best team in the NFL is pretty small. A couple of plays might be the difference. The #1 team in the country is probably going to be a 10 point favorite over the #10 team at the college level. The gap on talent between the #1 team and the #32 team is a massive gulf. The #1 team's backups would be competitive against the #32 team. I just don't know if Belichick after a career in the NFL was prepared for the level of talent disparity he was going to face.
    • I wouldn't drop David Moore, honestly. Moore, while long in the tooth and light in production, is about the only veteran presence in the WR room now and the only one with extensive experience with what Canales wants and needs. And that's probably why he made the roster. Still, aging safeties who might make a decent gunner just aren't where you want to spend your money and roster spots. Even at vet minimum, he's not going to be as cheap or maybe as trainable as some UDFA who would run through a brick wall for a roster spot for rookie league minimum and a chance.
×
×
  • Create New...