Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your Carolina Panther 8 player Big Board

MHS831

By MHS831,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 hours ago, jamos14 said:

1. Lawrence

2. Wilson

3. Sewell

4. Pitts

5. Fields

6. Chase

I'm trading down if none of these guys are available.

 

Interesting--was waiting to see one that did not reach the top--in my book, there are 4qbs and 3 elite-generational talents---but my emotions put an eighth one in there.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
16 minutes ago, Basbear said:

After Darnold

 

1. Sunshine

2. Sewell

3. Pitts

4. Chase

5. Wilson

6. Waddle

7. Kwity Paye

8. Lance

9. Slater

10. Darrisaw

 

Missed the cut- Sustain, Smith, AVT, JOK

2-4 all are .01% difference

 

 Yes--2-4 are elite. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

If he fell to 8 there would be something seriously wrong with him.

Sshh. On April 28, I am going to Redit and tell everyone that he was once a woman then had surgery to come back for the prom because he already had a date and purchased a dress then started to have another surgery to revert back but forgot what gender he is so he is conflicted.drop stock GIF

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
Just now, MHS831 said:

Sshh. On April 28, I am going to Redit and tell everyone that he was once a woman then had surgery to come back for the prom because he already had a date and purchased a dress then started to have another surgery to revert back but forgot what gender he is so he is conflicted.drop stock GIF

That might scare off a couple of the older owners.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
section543 Enthusiast

section543

Posted
Posted

Waddle has had an amazing college career and would be fun to watch here- but I can’t help being reminded of Ted Ginn having a similar college career and being drafted in the top 10 by Miami...... Very talented but limited impact as a pro.

This is where positional value affects my thinking.

We always assume these top guys are “can’t miss” yet many of them do. I think Jimmy Johnson liked to have extra picks to increase his chances of hitting on players, plus, we need a lot more players.

I would be ok with trading back to increase our number of top 50 picks or even get a 1st in 22.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, section543 said:

Waddle has had an amazing college career and would be fun to watch here- but I can’t help being reminded of Ted Ginn having a similar college career and being drafted in the top 10 by Miami...... Very talented but limited impact as a pro.

This is where positional value affects my thinking.

We always assume these top guys are “can’t miss” yet many of them do. I think Jimmy Johnson liked to have extra picks to increase his chances of hitting on players, plus, we need a lot more players.

I would be ok with trading back to increase our number of top 50 picks or even get a 1st in 22.

There is always that one player that you remember that shows us how stupid we are about the transition from college to pros.  Not just us---the GMs and scouts.  I mean, they weigh them, interview them, watch hours of film, and they make them run drills, jump high and far, lift weights, take tests, and the success rate for first rounders is about 55%?

Why go through that much trouble?  Flip a damn coin.

Waddle was the slot WR with 2 pretty good WRs on the outside.  He can scat, for sure.  Here, the situation will be pretty similar.  So maybe there is something there.

I look at positional value, and a LT is worth far more than a slot WR.   So for me, it is a no brainer--I hope he is gone before we pick.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanicPete Contributor

PanicPete

Posted
Posted

If we are taking a pass catcher and Pitts is there that is a no brainer to me. You can say he's just a TE all day long but some of the best weapons(ESPECIALLY in the red zone) in the league play that position and we have nothing there. I doubt he is there though

 

Otherwise go o-line/ secondary rest of draft lol

1. Lawrence

2. Wilson

3. Fields

4. Pitts

5. Sewell

6. Slater

7. Lance

8. Parsons

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • cranky
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By cranky · Posted

      Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • bythenbrs
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By bythenbrs · Posted

      With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Daeavorn
      The Carolina Huddle

      By Daeavorn · Posted

      Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...