Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chris “Troll” Simms- First round mock


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Seems pretty dead on

His list had Brady (with the best weapons of his career) ranked 15th.  A broken Cam with no weapons top 10.     Simms is basically a huddler looking to get a thread some action selectively putting in some stuff to get it going...

again, Fields at 32 is just trolling.   He puts that in to get people talking before the draft and to come back to him after the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

His list had Brady (with the best weapons of his career) ranked 15th.  A broken Cam with no weapons top 10.     Simms is basically a huddler looking to get a thread some action selectively putting in some stuff to get it going...

again, Fields at 32 is just trolling.   He puts that in to get people talking before the draft and to come back to him after the draft. 

I was referring to Teddy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I mean I kindof respect him for it.  He doesnt just give his hot take and leave.  He actually breaks down why he feels like that. 

He scapegoated last year though or the year before. When he got picks wrong instead of just owning it he claims he let outside interference influence the choices he made. When he’s wrong again will he use that again or own his decisions? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, CRA said:

His list had Brady (with the best weapons of his career) ranked 15th.  A broken Cam with no weapons top 10.     Simms is basically a huddler looking to get a thread some action selectively putting in some stuff to get it going...

again, Fields at 32 is just trolling.   He puts that in to get people talking before the draft and to come back to him after the draft. 

If we trade down and Fields is still there and we still pass on him I’d be very confused about the franchise. There’s no way he drops to 32. This guy, genuinely dislikes Justin Fields for some reason. Maybe he never returned his calls or something. 

Edited by Varking
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Varking said:

He scapegoated last year though or the year before. When he got picks wrong instead of just owning it he claims he let outside interference influence the choices he made. When he’s wrong again will he use that again or own his decisions? 

The idea of a mock draft is it's supposed to be predicated on what teams think about certain players, not what the guy doing the mock thinks.

That, to me, is where Simms fails.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...