Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So which LT do you want us to draft tomorrow in round 2?


Agent Blue
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Agent Blue said:

i went and looked at all our OL pff grades.

most were like 40ish

only Moton had a good grade.

everyone else was mostly below average

you're looking at players. It was 18th overall at the end of the season.

18. CAROLINA PANTHERS

The Panthers haven’t had any disastrous efforts along the offensive line this season, but they also don’t have all that many players to highlight. The clear choice for the best player along their line this season is right tackle Taylor Moton, who enters the offseason as an unrestricted free agent along with the majority of the Panthers’ starters on the line.

Moton has delivered three straight seasons of quality play as the starting right tackle for Carolina, but his career-high PFF grade of 81.2 this season — third among qualifying right tackles — came thanks to his run-blocking grade catching up to what he’s been able to do in pass protection throughout his career. Moton’s 76.3 run-blocking grade in 2020 was nearly 10 points higher than his previous career-high mark of 67.4 in 2019.

Edited by Panthercougar68
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Agent Blue said:

i went and looked at all our OL pff grades.

most were like 40ish

only Moton had a good grade.

everyone else was mostly below average

 You are correct.

Just now, Panthercougar68 said:

you're looking at players. It was 18th overall at the end of the season.

You're assuming out offensive line is the same as last season.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthercougar68 said:

you're looking at players. It was 18th overall at the end of the season.

i don't care about overall.

all i know is most our OL sucks.

only Moton is worth a darn.

don't care if 18 other teams suck worse than us.

we suck at OL and we need a massive injection of talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, saX man said:

But Richie Grant may happen and then full board freakout will commence.

It’s pretty funny watching half of this group jump of a bridge about decisions made by the new regime and they haven’t the slightest clue what they are talking about. Bunch of miserable fugs on here that think they are GM of the year. More like BM of the year 💩

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

none we would be reaching, there will be better players available at WR, FS, D-line

Radunz is not a reach at all. Everyone has him in that 30ish range.

Cosmi is projected in the 1st by many.

Edited by Agent Blue
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ATLpanther said:

It’s pretty funny watching half of this group jump of a bridge about decisions made by the new regime and they haven’t the slightest clue what they are talking about. Bunch of miserable fugs on here that think they are GM of the year. More like BM of the year 💩

Sometimes people have opinions, and there are places to discuss them called open forums.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...