Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Opinions..franchise taking Oline in later rounds


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'd be OK with spending some coin on a free agent LT (ie Villanueva ... Or however it's spelled) and let's draft BPA.  We may be able to nicely fill some holes at other need positions with BPA (ie. IOL, S, WR).  Our guard play last year was terrible.  There are NFL starters available in rds 2 & 3 at these positions.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rounds 1,2,3 picks each year for 20 years.

That is 60 picks.  There are 22 starters between offense and defense.

We have taken 11 offensive linemen.  That is 18.33 percent of the time.

Eight of them, Gross, Wharton, Mathis, Kalil, Otah, Silatolu, Turner and Moton we average to elite starters.  Granted one can argue Silatolu and Mathis ended up being a late bloomer with the Eagles.

Nelson, Butler, Little were busts.  Little could still turn into something but I doubt it. 

That is a pretty good draft record and proof that we have not really neglected the position.

Throw in luck of the draft, average playing career, and needing 22 starters we've done far better than average.

 

Edited by Fan01
spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fan01 said:

Rounds 1,2,3 picks each year for 20 years.

That is 60 picks.  There are 22 starters between offense and defense.

We have taken 11 offensive linemen.  That is 18.33 percent of the time.

Eight of them, Gross, Wharton, Mathis, Kalil, Otah, Silatolu, Turner and Moton we average to elite starters.  Granted one can argue Silatolu and Mathis ended up being a late bloomer with the Eagles.

Nelson, Butler, Little were busts.  Little could still turn into something but I doubt it. 

That is a pretty good draft record and proof that we have not really neglected the position.

Throw in luck of the draft, average playing career, and need 22 starters we've done far better than average.

 

We havent drafted a left tackle in the first round in over a decade.  This includes when we had an all world franchise qb.  A generational talent.  There are less than 10% of tackles drafted outside of the first that make All Pro as a first round pick.   So in closing its laughable to even suggest we have a good draft record in drafting offensive line help.  Its insanity that we havent even tried given its the one constant on every good playoff team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

We havent drafted a left tackle in the first round in over a decade.  This includes when we had an all world franchise qb.  A generational talent.  There are less than 10% of tackles drafted outside of the first that make All Pro as a first round pick.   So in closing its laughable to even suggest we have a good draft record in drafting offensive line help.  Its insanity that we havent even tried given its the one constant on every good playoff team.

You don't need an All-Pro OT to have a good Oline.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

We havent drafted a left tackle in the first round in over a decade.  This includes when we had an all world franchise qb.  A generational talent.  There are less than 10% of tackles drafted outside of the first that make All Pro as a first round pick.   So in closing its laughable to even suggest we have a good draft record in drafting offensive line help.  Its insanity that we havent even tried given its the one constant on every good playoff team.

 

So your whole argument lately is you cannot get All Pro talent for the LT position outside the 1st. We can't draft a LT if he isn't graded out to be an All Pro?

 

Why do we need All Pros? Is not solid consistent play good enough? There is still a chance we can address the LT position tonight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

So your whole argument lately is you cannot get All Pro talent for the LT position outside the 1st. We can't draft a LT if he isn't graded out to be an All Pro?

 

Why do we need All Pros? Is not solid consistent play good enough? There is still a chance we can address the LT position tonight. 

We havent even had solid consistent play.  Dont kid yourself.  Pointing out the correlation between All pro and first round is just to show that you have to draft high to get a talented LT.  Something we havent done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

We havent even had solid consistent play.  Dont kid yourself.  Pointing out the correlation between All pro and first round is just to show that you have to draft high to get a talented LT.  Something we havent done. 

 

You say "Something we haven't done" like this FO team has been here for years. This is Rhules' 2nd draft, and his 1st with Fritts. Way to early in their tenure to see trends.

 

You are harping on past deficiencies that really have nothing to do with the present regime

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

We havent drafted a left tackle in the first round in over a decade.  This includes when we had an all world franchise qb.  A generational talent.  There are less than 10% of tackles drafted outside of the first that make All Pro as a first round pick.   So in closing its laughable to even suggest we have a good draft record in drafting offensive line help.  Its insanity that we havent even tried given its the one constant on every good playoff team.

I don't really disagree but you can't go chasing a franchise LT in the first round of every draft.  That's the definition of reaching.  If Sewell had fallen one more spot we'd have taken him.  And having Cam allowed them a luxury, right or wrong, to look at other positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fan01 said:

I don't really disagree but you can't go chasing a franchise LT in the first round of every draft.  That's the definition of reaching.  If Sewell had fallen one more spot we'd have taken him.  And having Cam allowed them a luxury, right or wrong, to look at other positions.

Would it have been reaching last year to get Beckton or Wirfs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Umm, you realize they just passed up the second best LT prospect in the draft right?

 

Um...you do realise that there are still LTs on the board. Right?

 

Slater had questions, and many have him penciled in as a G. 

 

Ah screw it. Flame away. Maybe someday we will get that All Pro LT you so covet.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Um...you do realise that there are still LTs on the board. Right?

 

Slater had questions, and many have him penciled in as a G. 

 

Ah screw it. Flame away. Maybe someday we will get that All Pro LT you so covet.  

Maybe someday, but its not going to happen throwing darts in the 2nd and 3rd round.  Oh and San Diego isnt moving Slater to guard they immediately announced he was their starting LT.  Imagine that, having a franchise qb and immediately drafting a LT to protect him.  Damn that must be nice. 

So tell me again, what are Slaters questions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...