Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Fitterer: We want Sam Darnold to just flush what's happened


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Oh me. Ginn wasn’t a part of the team until 2013. Cams 3rd. And had started 3 games in 3 years for a 49er team desperately needing WR. Hixon caught 7 passes. As a Panther. Total. Olsen just got traded for a 3rd. Far from his prime. 
 

    
 

  

2013 roster, not Cam’s rookie year. Lol yeah my bad on that one. Which brings Greg to his prime and gives the Panthers Ginn and Smith. Regardless it’s not hard to look better than Perriman, 2nd round rookie Mims, and Crowder????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

2013 roster, not Cam’s rookie year. Lol yeah my bad on that one. Which brings Greg to his prime and gives the Panthers Ginn and Smith. Regardless it’s not hard to look better than Perriman, 2nd round rookie Mims, and Crowder????

 It is the only team that will put you on the field is the Panthers. Ginn not only didn’t play before getting here, he chased the money to ARI, and produced less than a catch a game. Then 2015, a QB won MVP with that same player as his WR1. Add in a rookie Funchess, the slowest WR in the NFL, and an UDFA. I’ll take that Jets group over most of Cams groups. The Panthers played in a playoff game with a 60% Funchess and 4 PS WRs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Toomers said:

 It is the only team that will put you on the field is the Panthers. Ginn not only didn’t play before getting here, he chased the money to ARI, and produced less than a catch a game. Then 2015, a QB won MVP with that same player as his WR1. Add in a rookie Funchess, the slowest WR in the NFL, and an UDFA. I’ll take that Jets group over most of Cams groups. The Panthers played in a playoff game with a 60% Funchess and 4 PS WRs. 

I already did the 2018 with Moore, Samuel, Olsen, Funchess, Byrd, CMC...  I get we didn’t give Cam weapons that often but this Jets team he is high on had Mims as his 3rd. Mims had 350 yards and 0 TDs, Crowder 699 yards 6 TDs, and Perriman 505 yards and 3 TDs. Olsen alone makes most groups better....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I already did the 2018 with Moore, Samuel, Olsen, Funchess, Byrd, CMC...  I get we didn’t give Cam weapons that often but this Jets team he is high on had Mims as his 3rd. Mims had 350 yards and 0 TDs, Crowder 699 yards 6 TDs, and Perriman 505 yards and 3 TDs. Olsen alone makes most groups better....

Good for you. What does the 2018 WR group have anything to do with a playoff appearance? Olsen had 291 yds that year. Does that mean he wasn’t as good as Mims? Is it stats? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Good for you. What does the 2018 WR group have anything to do with a playoff appearance? Olsen had 291 yds that year. Does that mean he wasn’t as good as Mims? Is it stats? 

Yeah he got hurt but was on the team to be a weapon for Cam.  Care to read off the other receivers stats or does that not go well with your cherry picking? Mims has never had a NFL TD and that’s the 3rd option lol. What a stupid debate this is.

Playoff appearances? What are you talking about? You jumped in the middle of a debate where the other person stated the Jets had better talent around Darnold than we ever ever gave Cam. I gave examples of Cam having better options. The Jets were a joke and didn’t give Darnold a line or legit weapons. It’s why the Kiper, McAfee, Schein, McShay and any other analyst is at least curious to see what Darnold can do with an actual coach and weapons around him. I’m not sitting here and saying Darnold will be good, but I’m also not going to say that situation he was in was any decent indication of how good of a player he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah he got hurt but was on the team to be a weapon for Cam.  Care to read off the other receivers stats or does that not go well with your cherry picking? Mims has never had a NFL TD and that’s the 3rd option lol. What a stupid debate this is.

Playoff appearances? What are you talking about? You jumped in the middle of a debate where the other person stated the Jets had better talent around Darnold than we ever ever gave Cam. I gave examples of Cam having better options. The Jets were a joke and didn’t give Darnold a line or legit weapons. It’s why the Kiper, McAfee, Schein, McShay and any other analyst is at least curious to see what Darnold can do with an actual coach and weapons around him. I’m not sitting here and saying Darnold will be good, but I’m also not going to say that situation he was in was any decent indication of how good of a player he is.

 That’s why I asked. But it seems to have changed now. And why no mention of Smith, Funchess being a colossal failure. And starting many of these games. Samuel played 4-5 games with Cam. Perriman had a better year with Jamies. Crowder was the same player he always has been. Mims has a half an injury filled season. But we can’t afford him the same luxury of squinting into focus how he will be something he’s never been. And the 2017 was a playoff team with Funchess(hurt) and 4 PS WRs. Yet you brought up 2018 and specifically said you already covered it and why do that if you weren’t confused on years. Or did you forget that already. 
 

   And you have been shown there were years that they didn’t. All while you’re making up rosters for the wrong years and leaving out anything that does further the fantasy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its like comparing Apples to Oranges no matter what. (Darnolds Jets v Cam's Panthers). We will get to see the only comparison of the two that matters this Year when the Panthers face the Jets (If they both are still healthy and starting by that point). For the record I hope Cam wins every game he plays this year but that one (and maybe the second meeting if both clubs make the Super Bowl).

Long Shot GIFs | Tenor

Edited by Michael G
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Toomers said:

 That’s why I asked. But it seems to have changed now. And why no mention of Smith, Funchess being a colossal failure. And starting many of these games. Samuel played 4-5 games with Cam. Perriman had a better year with Jamies. Crowder was the same player he always has been. Mims has a half an injury filled season. But we can’t afford him the same luxury of squinting into focus how he will be something he’s never been. And the 2017 was a playoff team with Funchess(hurt) and 4 PS WRs. Yet you brought up 2018 and specifically said you already covered it and why do that if you weren’t confused on years. Or did you forget that already. 
 

   And you have been shown there were years that they didn’t. All while you’re making up rosters for the wrong years and leaving out anything that does further the fantasy. 

I’m so confused about what you are arguing? So you think the Jets surround Darnold with better players and coaches/staff than Cam had any year? That was my debate. He stated that and I gave two years 2013 and 2018 where the talent was far greater than Mims, Crowder, and Perriman. Hell even in the 2015 year Ginn had more yards/TDs than any Jets WR, Olsen had over 1000 yards and Cotchery, Brown, and Funchess each had more yards than Mims. Anyway go find an analyst/writer/anyone who thinks Darnold had good talent and coaches around him. My whole point before you barged in was he never had a fair chance with those coaches and that team around him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Michael G said:

Its like comparing Apples to Oranges no matter what. (Darnolds Jets v Cam's Panthers). We will get to see the only comparison of the two that matters this Year when the Panthers face the Jets (If they both are still healthy and starting by that point). For the record I hope Cam wins every game he plays this year but that one (and maybe the second meeting if both clubs make the Super Bowl).

Very much so.

Newton would be a poor fit to the kind of offense we're running now. Likewise, I wouldn't ask Sam Darnold to run the kind of plays we had for Newton before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I’m so confused about what you are arguing? So you think the Jets surround Darnold with better players and coaches/staff than Cam had any year? That was my debate. He stated that and I gave two years 2013 and 2018 where the talent was far greater than Mims, Crowder, and Perriman. Hell even in the 2015 year Ginn had more yards/TDs than any Jets WR, Olsen had over 1000 yards and Cotchery, Brown, and Funchess each had more yards than Mims. Anyway go find an analyst/writer/anyone who thinks Darnold had good talent and coaches around him. My whole point before you barged in was he never had a fair chance with those coaches and that team around him.

No. And since I’ve cited specific seasons that should be obvious. You brought up Ginn(wrong by a couple) so I corrected it. Plus showed Ginn couldn’t play for another team. Yet he is a talent? A true WR1 who dropped 6 40+ yd TD passes in 2015 alone. And showed that just because a WR or TE puts up better stats doesn’t mean they are. Or Olsen would be considered worse than Mims? Right? 
 

   Please explain how the 2014-15 WR group was better than the Jets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Toomers said:

No. And since I’ve cited specific seasons that should be obvious. You brought up Ginn(wrong by a couple) so I corrected it. Plus showed Ginn couldn’t play for another team. Yet he is a talent? A true WR1 who dropped 6 40+ yd TD passes in 2015 alone. And showed that just because a WR or TE puts up better stats doesn’t mean they are. Or Olsen would be considered worse than Mims? Right? 
 

   Please explain how the 2014-15 WR group was better than the Jets. 

The argument was ANY year we had Cam which is now proven to be wrong. However in 2014 Benjamin had over 1000 yards and 9 TDs (he was solid until his mom passed sadly) Olsen had over 1000 yards and 6 TDs, and Cotchery had over 500 yards beating out Mims and his 350.... That’s 2 more 1000 yard receivers than the Jets had. It’s not that we gave Cam a ton of weapons (we didn’t and his career got cut short before of his shitty offensive line), it’s that the Jets had no weapons AND a terrible coach for a young QB. I know it’s a matter of opinion, but it can easily be argued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Toomers said:


 

   Please explain how the 2014-15 WR group was better than the Jets. 

Are you trolling?

Because this is a real zinger of a take here.   

ANY WR group is better than the Jets. 

Hell...a High-School JV team was better than the Jets.

Edited by glenwo2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/b8cb7513-e010-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/bcc6351f-df10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/215f1c32-e010-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/2aaa4f45-e010-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/85678457-e010-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/8c5d066f-e010-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/5539b830-e610-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/31f3682d-e710-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/11879601-f510-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/52b987cf-f410-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/f835b92e-f510-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/607903a0-f510-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864   https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/13340fd4-e910-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/eedf98e8-ea10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/b1cd1a2c-eb10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/dc7add4b-eb10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/1173afac-eb10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/9b3ce3ba-eb10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/bb15b0f3-eb10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/34a73dfb-eb10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/e04553c9-ec10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/e47ca0d2-ec10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/03535913-ed10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/6084ce4e-ed10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864   https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/07346d42-df10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/3f8a8ade-e010-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/53c6c8b4-e110-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/062e9c45-e310-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/e2b6d707-e510-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/d263566a-e610-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/d0b9b26b-e710-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/8826a310-ec10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/a879baac-ed10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864 https://mstep.powerappsportals.us/forums/general-discussion/ee5135e0-ef10-ef11-a73c-001dd804f864
    • Fitspresso has taken the weight loss world by storm, claiming to be a revolutionary "coffee hack" that melts fat away effortlessly. But before you dive into a purchase, understanding the hype and the facts behind Fitspresso is crucial. This review will delve into Fitspresso's claims, ingredients, potential benefits and drawbacks, user experiences, and ultimately, help you decide if it's the right fit for your weight loss journey. Burning Promises: What Does Fitspresso Claim to Do? Fitspresso positions itself as a natural weight loss supplement that utilizes the power of a unique blend of ingredients to supercharge your metabolism and burn fat faster. Their claims are bold: Effortless fat burning: Fitspresso promises to keep your "fat burning window" open for longer, leading to accelerated fat loss without drastic lifestyle changes. Increased energy levels: The supplement boasts a boost in energy levels, allowing you to tackle your day with more vigor. Craving control: Fitspresso claims to curb sugar cravings and keep you feeling fuller for longer, reducing unhealthy snacking habits. Overall well-being: Improved digestion, stress reduction, and a general sense of well-being are all touted benefits of incorporating Fitspresso into your routine. Unveiling the Ingredients: What's Inside Fitspresso? Fitspresso prides itself on its all-natural formula. While the exact ingredient list might be proprietary, reviews and the manufacturer's information point to some key components: Green Tea Extract: A well-known metabolism booster, green tea extract is packed with antioxidants and may help increase calorie burning. Probiotics: These gut-friendly bacteria can contribute to digestive health, which can indirectly impact weight management. Guarana Seed: A natural source of caffeine, guarana can provide an energy boost but may also cause jitters in some users. Scientific Scrutiny: Does the Science Back Up Fitspresso's Claims? While some of the ingredients in Fitspresso have shown promise in weight management research, the evidence for Fitspresso itself is limited. Here's a closer look: Metabolism Boost: Green tea extract does have some thermogenic properties, meaning it can increase body heat production and slightly elevate metabolism. However, the effect is likely to be modest. Fat Burning: There's no magic bullet for effortless fat burning. Significant weight loss requires a combination of healthy eating, regular exercise, and a sustainable calorie deficit. Craving Control: While some ingredients may influence satiety hormones, their effectiveness in completely eliminating cravings can be variable. User Experiences: What Do People Say About Fitspresso? Fitspresso reviews paint a mixed picture. Many users report positive experiences, feeling more energized, noticing a slight improvement in weight management, and appreciating the convenience of the supplement. However, critical reviews also exist. Some users mention minimal results, while others highlight side effects like jitters or digestive discomfort potentially linked to the caffeine content. It's important to remember that individual experiences can vary significantly. The Money-Back Guarantee: A Safety Net or a Marketing Tactic? Fitspresso offers a 180-day money-back guarantee, which can be appealing. However, be sure to understand the fine print. Many money-back guarantees have specific requirements for returns, and shipping costs might not be refundable. Considering the Alternatives: What Else is Out There? Before committing to Fitspresso, explore other avenues for sustainable weight loss. Here are some alternatives: Diet and Exercise: The cornerstone of healthy weight management is a balanced diet combined with regular physical activity. Behavioral Changes: Small, sustainable changes in your daily routine, like portion control or mindful eating, can lead to significant results over time. Consulting a Doctor or Nutritionist: A healthcare professional can create a personalized plan that addresses your specific needs and goals. The Verdict: Is Fitspresso the Right Choice for You? The decision ultimately depends on your individual needs and expectations. Here's a breakdown to help you decide: Pros: All-natural formula (assuming full ingredient list transparency) Potential for a slight metabolism boost and energy increase (for some) Convenience of a supplement Money-back guarantee (read the fine print) Cons: Lack of strong scientific evidence for significant weight loss Potential side effects May not be a sustainable solution for long-term weight management Cost, which could be better invested in healthy food options   https://jobs.firerescue1.com/job/2rcp3c/in-depth-fitspresso-reviews-honest-customer-experiences-and-feedback-fits-39/fitspresso-reviews/florida
    • It's GAMEDAY AGAIN win this one boys it's one game! 
×
×
  • Create New...