Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

 

They have actually had 11 winning seasons since 1995(last in 2015 at 10-6) and 7 playoff appearances. 

Sooooooo........that statement kind of applies to us too, right?

We've won the NFC and been to the Superbowl.  We've had several playoff appearances and wins....

They are the team with the longest playoff drought at the moment...so we are the better team...at this moment.  I don't care that they were 10-6 in 2015.  We were 15-1.

They just went through an overhaul so they are not the same jets as last year.  We just went through an upgrade, so neither are we.  When is week 1?

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SBBlue said:

sorry I missed the QB my bad....

Wow, way to narrow it down.  

I hope you're around here come fall.  I really really do.

No worries. 

Only 1 QB amongst the 22 positions on the field and only 32 starters in the league...by definition it's a narrow discussion. 

What are you expecting this Fall?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

No worries. 

Only 1 QB amongst the 22 positions on the field and only 32 starters in the league...by definition it's a narrow discussion. 

What are you expecting this Fall?

Well, I looked it up...you're right the jets are real good at ruining Qbs.  

I think Darnold is going to play better than he did with Jets...since there will actually be olinemen, and receivers without the dropsies, and a running back who wasn't pulled off his couch...and an OC who can spell OC, and we can snap the ball.

Edited by SBBlue
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Well, I looked it up...you're right the jets are real good at ruining Qbs.  

I think Darnold is going to play better than he did with Jets...since there will actually be olinemen, and receivers without the dropsies, and a running back who wasn't pulled off his couch...and an OC who can spell OC, and we can snap the ball.

Well there's always a 1st for everything...

...let's hope you are right.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Well the extra 2 wins are predicated on a combination of a healthy/available CMC + generally upgraded personnel due to the passing of a new year...

...so, not much.  

I like this thinking....working with the public and crisis management all my life, my expectations are always moderate, that way I’m never disappointed by our humanness.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah. I actually was watching NFL football at that time. I didn't start when Sam Darnold got drafted.

Carr rushed for considerably more yardage and and same amount of TD's in his first three years than Darnold. 

Had you watched the NFL at that time, you would have seen the historically bad protection he saw. It had nothing to do with him not being able to make plays on the run. That's ridiculous.

I started watching NFL Football in 1997 but I don't think that matters much to you as you just like to insult me when I'm trying to have a civil conversation with you.

So how about you try responding like an adult instead of an a-hole, huh?   Jesus christ....

Edited by glenwo2
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

I started watching NFL Football in 1997 but I don't think that matters much to you as you just like to insult me when I'm trying to have a civil conversation with you.

So how about you try responding like an adult instead of an a-hole, huh?   Jesus christ....

I never claimed not to be an asshole.

Anyway, I did make an assumption that you were simply a USC fan that followed your player into the league based on your single player post history here. 

If I simply do a post history search you literally only discuss him. That doesn't strike me as much of a Jets fan or a Panthers fan.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I never claimed not to be an asshole.

Anyway, I did make an assumption that you were simply a USC fan that followed your player into the league based on your single player post history here. 

If I simply do a post history search you literally only discuss him. That doesn't strike me as much of a Jets fan or a Panthers fan.

He’s not a USC fan.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know it's only been training camp and one preseason game, but I think T-Mac has already shown his floor to be exactly what I said about him in the pre-draft process. That his floor if he never improves his game, is as one of the best #2 WRs in the NFL, if not even still a low end #1 (i.e. a 25th-ish best WR in the league). I think it's safe to say he's already established himself as our #1, and there are only a small handful of teams in the league where I don't think he'd be their starting #2 WR in Week 1. Bengals (Higgins), Dolphins (Waddle), Eagles (Smith), Bucs (Godwin if healthy), Rams (Adams) are really the only teams where I think he'd be the #3 as a rookie in Week 1.  A few others like the Lions (Williams), Bears (Odunze), Seahawks (Kupp), Commanders (Deebo), where he'd be the 2b to start the season, just because they're vets and/or already have a year or two of experience with their team/QB. And even having said that, I think by year 2, he's better than every one of those players (And no, I'm not saying he's already going to be better than a prime version of Adams, just whatever he'll be at 33 next year), and same goes for Kupp, but that's more because it seems like his body might be quitting on him in a way that hasn't happened to Adams (yet).
    • Well to be fair, Horn not practicing right now to let his stitches heal up from a car accident isn't something that should be concerning.  Sure, you don't want him missing practice leading into the season, but it's one that once healed, won't have lingering affects or fear of re-injuring it, it was just bad luck.
    • Quality backups are absolutely important. This franchise has been plagued with depth problems. That said, there is a little bit of dismay that Mays can't beat out a 1-legged man, and all the talk going into the off-season was how BC would certainly be gone since he had position versatility.  In the end, it doesn't matter too awfully much, as I would be shocked to no end if Corbett makes it through the season. We know what we have in reserve, and that should surely be better than trying to sign random fat guys mid season to try and take over.
×
×
  • Create New...