Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

 

They have actually had 11 winning seasons since 1995(last in 2015 at 10-6) and 7 playoff appearances. 

Sooooooo........that statement kind of applies to us too, right?

We've won the NFC and been to the Superbowl.  We've had several playoff appearances and wins....

They are the team with the longest playoff drought at the moment...so we are the better team...at this moment.  I don't care that they were 10-6 in 2015.  We were 15-1.

They just went through an overhaul so they are not the same jets as last year.  We just went through an upgrade, so neither are we.  When is week 1?

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SBBlue said:

sorry I missed the QB my bad....

Wow, way to narrow it down.  

I hope you're around here come fall.  I really really do.

No worries. 

Only 1 QB amongst the 22 positions on the field and only 32 starters in the league...by definition it's a narrow discussion. 

What are you expecting this Fall?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

No worries. 

Only 1 QB amongst the 22 positions on the field and only 32 starters in the league...by definition it's a narrow discussion. 

What are you expecting this Fall?

Well, I looked it up...you're right the jets are real good at ruining Qbs.  

I think Darnold is going to play better than he did with Jets...since there will actually be olinemen, and receivers without the dropsies, and a running back who wasn't pulled off his couch...and an OC who can spell OC, and we can snap the ball.

Edited by SBBlue
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Well, I looked it up...you're right the jets are real good at ruining Qbs.  

I think Darnold is going to play better than he did with Jets...since there will actually be olinemen, and receivers without the dropsies, and a running back who wasn't pulled off his couch...and an OC who can spell OC, and we can snap the ball.

Well there's always a 1st for everything...

...let's hope you are right.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Well the extra 2 wins are predicated on a combination of a healthy/available CMC + generally upgraded personnel due to the passing of a new year...

...so, not much.  

I like this thinking....working with the public and crisis management all my life, my expectations are always moderate, that way I’m never disappointed by our humanness.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah. I actually was watching NFL football at that time. I didn't start when Sam Darnold got drafted.

Carr rushed for considerably more yardage and and same amount of TD's in his first three years than Darnold. 

Had you watched the NFL at that time, you would have seen the historically bad protection he saw. It had nothing to do with him not being able to make plays on the run. That's ridiculous.

I started watching NFL Football in 1997 but I don't think that matters much to you as you just like to insult me when I'm trying to have a civil conversation with you.

So how about you try responding like an adult instead of an a-hole, huh?   Jesus christ....

Edited by glenwo2
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

I started watching NFL Football in 1997 but I don't think that matters much to you as you just like to insult me when I'm trying to have a civil conversation with you.

So how about you try responding like an adult instead of an a-hole, huh?   Jesus christ....

I never claimed not to be an asshole.

Anyway, I did make an assumption that you were simply a USC fan that followed your player into the league based on your single player post history here. 

If I simply do a post history search you literally only discuss him. That doesn't strike me as much of a Jets fan or a Panthers fan.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I never claimed not to be an asshole.

Anyway, I did make an assumption that you were simply a USC fan that followed your player into the league based on your single player post history here. 

If I simply do a post history search you literally only discuss him. That doesn't strike me as much of a Jets fan or a Panthers fan.

He’s not a USC fan.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After listening to Morgan's presser twice, I came away with some key beliefs. First of all, I don't think he's a bullshitter. What you see is what you get. When he says something, he means it.  The Teppers really have evolved as owners. Morgan has mentioned how they're easy to work with--a pleasure to work with a few times now. There seems to be a good relationship between all of them (and include Dave Canales on that). We'll see if it lasts. Yes, no one wanted to come to Carolina with the previous management, but that seems to have changed. The team signed arguably the top Edge, LB and OT on the market, two of them on pretty good deals and one on what I'll say is "not a bad one." And, credit Sunshine Dave "Flowers and Cotton Candy" Canales for helping to change the culture. Morgan mentioned getting guys--and I'm paraphrasing--that are not only great football players but great people. Don't look for us to be acquiring any James Pearce types anytime soon, just saying. We'll see if that holds true in the future. Dan Morgan really has set up the Panthers to take the BPA/BAP. He mentioned it at least a couple of times, and he doesn't seem pressured to pinpoint a particular position. He just wants quality players that will help the team. This is how it's going to be (to your joy or dismay, probably for as long as he's here), and personally I love it. Many of us know how Morgan was when he played: aggressive! That's what he's going to be when making acquisitions. He explicitly said it, and emphasized it. All avenues are open (think FA, waivers...the draft)! Personally, as long as it's controlled aggression and not reckless aggression, I love it.  On KP: "Mobility is big in this league."  He basically says if another QB is the BPA while drafting--we're going by our board, people--we're going to add them.        ...  
    • Canes are so fascinating. Despite inconsistent defense and poor goalie play they keep winning. 
    • I like Morgan's approach but I'll wait for a few winning seasons before giving too much praise.
×
×
  • Create New...