Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kawann Short cleared for football activities


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, AU-panther said:

People are fine with us paying 3-5 million a year for players that have never been good but not ok with a cheap one year deal for a player that was actually good at one time.

I’m not saying we should, but Short on a cheap one year deal isn’t that huge of a gamble.

 

It kind of is though. That's a roster spot for a guy who has been injured a lot and when he had played, he hasn't been more than average. I'd rather use that roster spot for a guy with more upside than KK right now. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

It kind of is though. That's a roster spot for a guy who has been injured a lot and when he had played, he hasn't been more than average. I'd rather use that roster spot for a guy with more upside than KK right now. 

I get that, but is a 1yr/$2m deal for Short any worse than a 2yr/10m deal for Erving?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AU-panther said:

I get that, but is a 1yr/$2m deal for Short any worse than a 2yr/10m deal for Erving?

Does KK wanna switch positions or something?  Because that is the only way to compare those deals.

I get nobody is thrilled with Erving or his pay, but the 2 positions demand different pay.  

Be free KK.  Go in peace big fella.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have spent two years getting younger, and lowering our Cap. Let's not return to spending on aging Vets, hoping they can rekindle the flames. I usually doesn't happen. Usually anywho.

 

It doesn't matter if KK will pay us to play. He old. He gone. Fare thee well KK, fare thee well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have said if you out even an average QB into the offense we are averaging 25+ points a game. But that will never happen with Bryce under center. 
    • The defense is 28 out of 32 in salary cap allocation for 2025. We have a ton of resources tied up in the offense including the highest paid OL in the league multiple 1st round WR's and multiple recent draft picks across the offense at TE and RB and we have two 1000 yard backs. Bryce and company couldn't get past Tyler Shough and his crew in 2 games. That's all there is to it. You can spin it and put the entire onus on the defense to your heart's desire it doesn't change the fact that this is an OFFENSIVE team now. If you want to argue that we should revert back to a defensive identity as we have been in the past which has brought us success then I will agree with you on that. But as it stands the onus is on the offense because that is where we have invested through the nose. Dave Canales and Bryce Young need to do a hell of a lot better than they have against the rebuilding Saints who without us should only have 2 wins this season.
    • Bryce is not trending up. He is the same QB he has always been. Bottom of the league in most categories.  If Canales thinks he can build a contender with Bryce then he is a bigger idiot then I thought.  Offense next year will have the same issues and be just as inconsistent as it was this year.  We have seen Bryce’a ceiling and it is 175 yards a game and that is not a QB you keep around as your starter. That is barely a backup.   
×
×
  • Create New...