Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Be a happier you - Learn to ignore others


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

You should protest this travesty by self imposing a life time ban  

But then I won’t be able to interact with people like you?

I agree with what they posted about the Rona. Misinformation kills. I just didn’t like the tone. 
People should get vaccinated. But I will not EVER look down on people who choose not to.
This is coming from a person who has lost people to Rona. Heck I lost a good older friend (77y/o) just this week to Rona.

I refused to be bitter and angry. Even though I sure as hell want to. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zod said:
2 hours ago, WarHeel said:

“Ignore everyone and be happy”

Unless you post what I disagree with in regards to the Rona and you get the ban hammer.

I’m all for the facts but this place is trying really hard to be Facebook. 

Horrible take. 

 

Misinformation that causes death and shutdowns isn't protected. 

This sure appears to be a case of do as I say -- not as I do.

How many people did your unvaccinated teenagers spread the Delta variant to?

I noticed your narrative here and on twitter has changed from "get vaccinated" to "hey you adults better get vaccinated "...

You had a responsibility to get your teenagers vaccinated and failed to do so.  

As such, assuming your logic has merit and should be applied evenly across the board -- you are in no position to point fingers and lay blame at the feet of others as it goes to cancellation of the Garth Brooks concert -- take a look in the mirror, you are the problem (as defined by you).

NOTE: I was fully vaccinated as soon as my group was allowed   

 

 

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

This sure appears to be a case of do as I say -- not as I do.

How many people did your unvaccinated teenagers spread the Delta variant to?

I noticed your narrative here and on twitter has changed from "get vaccinated" to "hey you adults better get vaccinated "...

You had a responsibility to get your teenagers vaccinated and failed to do so.  

As such, assuming your logic has merit and should be applied evenly across the board -- you are in no position to point fingers and lay blame at the feet of others as it goes to cancellation of the Garth Brooks concert -- take a look in the mirror, you are the problem (as defined by you).

NOTE: I was fully vaccinated as soon as my group was allowed   

 

 

 

Hey dumb shit, they aren't my kids that got sick. I have a mixed family household. Their dad is antivax. So take that, wad it up in a ball, and shove it up your ass.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Zod said:

Hey dumb poo, they aren't my kids that got sick. I have a mixed family household. Their dad is antivax. So take that, wad it up in a ball, and shove it up your ass.

So once you learned 12 & up were eligible why did you all of a sudden add "adults" to followup directives?

Surely there was more you could have done to protect others as well as yourself?  

Like maybe starting with knowing the rules as it goes to kids who will be in your household?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

why did you all of a sudden add "adults" to followup directives?

Because it is the adults filling up the ICU units and causing cancellations and us to shut down again.. If all adults were vaccinated, it would cut the COVID ICU down by 90% and we would not be having this discussion. No cancellations, not masks, nada. Has nothing to to with kids or teenagers. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Zod said:

I apologize for the language. This is a stressful time. 

Mine are two 18 year olds (vaxxed) and one 8 year old (unvaxxed). 

I want to apologize for pooing your posts and the posts in the PSA. I removed them. Like I said I agree with everything you guys said in it. Just the tone kinda irked me. Also I really shouldn’t be on forums till I have woken up and had my coffee. I removed the poo’s after I calmed down and realized pooing them was stupid. 
I hope your family stays safe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, YourLastThought said:

I think you and I have bickered back and forth a time or two but wow that's a good statement and totally true. Much wisdom in your post and my apologies for any dumb back and forths we have had.

I don't keep score with 99% of people in here. I come here to debate and I don't care if disagreements happen. The entire point of this place is to have healthy debates and discussions. It doesn't need to be an echo chamber of my own opinions. 

The only real animosity I probably have is the occasional trolling I will do of some of the dumber posters in here. Which, they are mostly now on my ignore list(which needed to be expanded anyway). No reason to derail threads just because I might get entertained insulting some nitwits. That's being part of the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Zod said:

Horrible take. 

 

Misinformation that causes death and shutdowns isn't protected. 

Depends on what you define as misinformation. Truth be told not a damn person on here knows anything other than what the experts are telling you. Some experts have conflicting opinions. So then it’s up to each person to determine how they’re going to protect themselves. 
 

This is a football forum so I only come here to see Panther related material but as someone who is fairly neutral in the political warfare it’s overwhelmingly obvious how one-sided the lean is in the place. Particularly with moderation. But it’s your brand and you have control so good on you. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

This sure appears to be a case of do as I say -- not as I do.

How many people did your unvaccinated teenagers spread the Delta variant to?

I noticed your narrative here and on twitter has changed from "get vaccinated" to "hey you adults better get vaccinated "...

You had a responsibility to get your teenagers vaccinated and failed to do so.  

As such, assuming your logic has merit and should be applied evenly across the board -- you are in no position to point fingers and lay blame at the feet of others as it goes to cancellation of the Garth Brooks concert -- take a look in the mirror, you are the problem (as defined by you).

NOTE: I was fully vaccinated as soon as my group was allowed   

 

 

 

The fact that you think I have teenagers or listen to Garth Brooks is exactly what is wrong with most of this site. 
 

You just can’t help yourselves when you see a good generalization. 
 

For what it’s worth I’m in the 99% of VO2max for my age at 30 y.o. Haven’t been sick in 3 years. And I’m still getting my vaccine next week. But only due to the fact that the military owns my body. Guess my body my choice only applies to killing babies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

The fact that you think I have teenagers or listen to Garth Brooks is exactly what is wrong with most of this site. 
 

You just can’t help yourselves when you see a good generalization. 
 

For what it’s worth I’m in the 99% of VO2max for my age at 30 y.o. Haven’t been sick in 3 years. And I’m still getting my vaccine next week. But only due to the fact that the military owns my body. Guess my body my choice only applies to bodily autonomy that does not infringe on the health and safety of others.

FTFY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30 Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
    • He isn't a good HC. I think he has proved that conclusively.
    • The missed tackle percentage is on that screen cap.
×
×
  • Create New...