Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deshaun maybe to the PANTHERS?!?! What?!!

Vader704

By Vader704,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

FearThe4 Contributor

FearThe4

Posted
Posted
Just now, Varking said:

Yeah... this is called an opinion. I don't believe you understand what facts are. Nor do you know how to control your emotions. 

how many more women that has to come out before you see what a POS this guy is?

Watson is a POS and if Tepper gives the green light to get him then the Panthers are going to take a huge PR HIt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FearThe4 Contributor

FearThe4

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

So, why the fug do you hang around if it's such "a dump?"

To think that one little sperm sacrificed everything he had to create you, and look at the results. I'll bet if he had to do it all over again, he would swim downstream just to keep your miserable ass from existing.

looks like I hit a nerve hahaha lmao keep them coming dude.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
FearThe4 Contributor

FearThe4

Posted
Posted
Just now, top dawg said:

I never understood using an alt. It's the fuging Internet, on a message board. No one knows you unless you want them to. Be a man, bitch!

well igo turn this place into a joke by making dumbasses like Linville a Mod so blame him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted

I have no problem trading for Watson if its a second round pick or a conditional 1st. Other than that he's toxic to me. I'm almost 99% sure he will not play this year because of criminal trials coming up and if he does get suspended then its probably going to be well into next year before he plays.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
FearThe4 Contributor

FearThe4

Posted
Posted
Just now, Snake said:

I have no problem trading for Watson if its a second round pick or a conditional 1st. Other than that he's toxic to me. I'm almost 99% sure he will not play this year because of criminal trials coming up and if he does get suspended then its probably going to be well into next year before he plays.

Watson is never playing again he is done the NFL would take a huge PR Hit if they let him play after all the poo he has done.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...