Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers Inactives

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted
Just now, MasterAwesome said:

Yeah that’s correct, 8 active. Some people don’t know our roster very well apparently.

They are too busy complaining to actually take the time to count.

So 8 is pretty standard for NFL teams.

of the three backups you have:

Tecklenburg for backup center, which Brown can not do.

BC for backup OT, which Brown can not do.

So basically the staff is taking Daley over Brown, a 6th rounder in his second game?

...... this is our biggest coaching problem???

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

 

 

We aren't carrying 4 TE's for the offense, its special teams probably.  I'm pretty sure all 4 got ST snaps last week.

A lot of teams carry more TEs than just the ones you think about being part of the offense.

 

 

Daryll Johnson was our STs ace we picked up from the Bills, no?

Edited by OldhamA
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, BlackPanther21_ said:

Yeah lets activate 4 TEs that we won't use, and have our only 2 backup lineman a 3rd round rookie and a former 6th rounder with injury issues. All while our starters consist of 2 injury prone journeymen, a center who is just not good, and a guy who just came off the covid list. Good idea.

If you have 3 injuries to the same position group during a game you're fuged either way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
    • TD alt
      Monroe Freeling’s lovely GF

      By TD alt · Posted

      He was also apparently.
×
×
  • Create New...