Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's 2005 again


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

With CMC in the game we have two legit weapons. We are missing the Olsen/Walls equivalent as we had Smitty and a RB back then too. Walls more for redzone dominance but Olsen to beat S/LB. Maybe Tremble can do that at some point but not now.

Arnold wasn't Olsen, but he was good (maybe better than we gave him credit for).

I agree that Tremble has loads of potential, but it's possible the braintrust overestimated how quickly he was going to develop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Anderson should keep the S so even if he is only threatening the deep shots its like Ginn where it can/is important. OL will give more time, deep threat guys will suffer as much as anyone with a trash line.

Marshall will be fine IMO and Shi Smith I really like too his quickness may be just what we need for more quick hitters. He hasn't done anything yet obviously but he has good potential.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fox007 said:

Well Anderson should keep the S so even if he is only threatening the deep shots its like Ginn where it can/is important. OL will give more time, deep threat guys will suffer as much as anyone with a trash line.

Marshall will be fine IMO and Shi Smith I really like too his quickness may be just what we need for more quick hitters. He hasn't done anything yet obviously but he has good potential.

I'd love to see Shi Smith in there but I get the impression that Alex Erickson is keeping him on the bench.

And it's not that Erickson is doing bad or anything, but I question whether he has the potential to be as good as Smith might be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

And for the record, I know some have said this but I'm not ready to say that extending Anderson was a bad decision yet.

I don't know if extending Anderson was a bad decision, but it could be a poor one. They have Moore, drafted two receivers, and had a few others that weren't terrible. Anderson's cap space could have been used elsewhere. It could have went to Moore, Burns, Oline free agents, or others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

I don't know if extending Anderson was a bad decision, but it could be a poor one. They have Moore, drafted two receivers, and had a few others that weren't terrible. Anderson's cap space could have been used elsewhere. It could have went to Moore, Burns, Oline free agents, or others.

I think most of the disagreement with the Anderson extension comes from people who were of the belief that Terrace Marshall was drafted to replace him.

I've seen that said. And to be fair, that was probably a reasonable theory at the time.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I think most of the disagreement with the Anderson extension comes from people who were of the belief that Terrace Marshall was drafted to replace him.

I've seen that said. And to be fair, that was probably a reasonable theory at the time.

Yep. Imagine the outrage if the team lets Moore walk since they resigned Anderson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are right, looking at the field, the receivers are not getting open.  Sam apparently likes DJ for contested catches and our opponents know that.  

The time to throw has moved from  2.6  average last year to  2.9 partially because receivers aren't getting open.

Frisman Jackson, and Joe Brady better figure this out quick or they are in for a very long season.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd love to see Shi Smith in there but I get the impression that Alex Erickson is keeping him on the bench.

And it's not that Erickson is doing bad or anything, but I question whether he has the potential to be as good as Smith might be.

Erickson is one of those guys that is fine for what he is he seems to have clutch hands which is also something we need but we drafted Smith you have to imagine for the quickness and he also has hands and strength for his size.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

Yep. Imagine the outrage if the team lets Moore walk since they resigned Anderson.

That cannot happen, for real. Not in the least...that really would be a move that'd make Hurney blush

1 minute ago, SBBlue said:

You are right, looking at the field, the receivers are not getting open.  Sam apparently likes DJ for contested catches and our opponents know that.  

Yea this is something that isn't really being talked about but it's true. Why is that? well I think a lot of it has to do with the running of the same routes like the Eagles DB said and they are sitting at certain spots flattened up and ready to drive on our routes like you say...put the game on and watch their secondary a lot of the times of our opponents. When the DB has his back level and hardly backing up and then going forward upon the pass that poo is not on the QB or WR it's the calls.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...