Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's 2005 again


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 10/11/2021 at 2:37 PM, Mr. Scot said:

Now, I know some are gonna clap back at this and say the real problems just boil down to Sam Darnold.

I love the post.  You are telling like it is.  Sam has his issues and they are fixable.  But he's not the main blame.  I love what you said about coaching to take the main threat away.  Game calling is a major problem.  Hopefully it will improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2021 at 2:57 PM, Fox007 said:

Well Anderson should keep the S so even if he is only threatening the deep shots its like Ginn where it can/is important. OL will give more time, deep threat guys will suffer as much as anyone with a trash line.

Marshall will be fine IMO and Shi Smith I really like too his quickness may be just what we need for more quick hitters. He hasn't done anything yet obviously but he has good potential.

There is a future, isn't there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ThPantherFan said:

Sam has his issues and they are fixable.  But he's not the main blame.

 

1 hour ago, ThPantherFan said:

but it sure looks like the 'got paid' syndrome.

Robby has been bad and if that continues he won't be here. But it's weird you have daggers out for him and not the leader of the offense who has been turning the ball over the same ugly ways he always has with the Jets and got bested last sunday by Daniel jones. Be consistent.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just as a reminder, we were not that good early. Those 3 games were ugly with solid D, CMC being our O and the same bad football the NFL rolls out every year for the first couple of games. Then Dallas gave out the definitive game plan to beat this team and its now on video for even the less than good coaches to emulate.

Those first 3 games were not good but a warning of what was to come.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2021 at 2:37 PM, Mr. Scot said:

Add in that as much as I like DJ Moore, he's not Steve Smith in his prime. Unless you had an absolute lockdown corner, trying to cover Smith one on one was insane. To be clear, I think Moore is a great receiver and one of the better pass catchers in the league, but he's not that guy. He can be covered one on one and it doesn't necessarily take an elite corner to do it (at least not yet).

Basically, if you have the resources to cover DJ Moore, you can tee off on Sam Darnold and dare the Panthers offense to beat you with everybody else.

 

Question - are all the dropped balls by DJ and Robbie the result of poor concentration on their part or a lack of trust in their QB? Marshall is on IR because he caught a ball that resulted in a big hit. Are DJ and Robbie worried that Sam is throwing concussion balls?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Raleigh PF said:

Question - are all the dropped balls by DJ and Robbie the result of poor concentration on their part or a lack of trust in their QB? Marshall is on IR because he caught a ball that resulted in a big hit. Are DJ and Robbie worried that Sam is throwing concussion balls?

Why risk injury or a career ending hit when you know you will never win sh*t with Darnold as qb.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...