Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants' Loss to Rams Defined by These 3 Stats


CarolinaLivin
 Share

Recommended Posts

Number 1: 4 Sacks, 7 QB hits

This offensive line is flat out terrible.

It all started out when on the first play of the game Nate Solder got obliterated by Leonard Floyd. This led to Daniel Jones getting hit mid throw which then led to a fumble. Thankfully the fumble was recovered but it was an embarrassing play by Solder nonetheless.

Things got worse after left tackle Andrew Thomas left the game with a leg injury after having it rolled up on a run play. After that it all went downhill.

It seemed as if the entire game the NY Giants offensive line was lost. None of them could block in the open field on screens or runs, they couldn’t hold their own on pass blocks, it seemed as if they just couldn’t do anything.

This resulted in four sacks and seven QB hits on Daniel Jones, and several quarterback pressures.

OL issues... hmmm... sound familiar?

Number 2: 50 pass attempts for Daniel Jones/4 turnovers for Jones

This is an embarrassing stat for the coaching staff.

With the NY Giants only having three active receivers — after Kadarius Toney got knocked out with an ankle injury — and an offensive line that mostly consisted of backups for most of the game, surely they’d at least try to mix things up and not put your QB in a worse situation than he already was in.

Lets just say they didn’t do that.

Number 3: 365 yards and 5 TD’s allowed

This was another awful game for the NY Giants’ defense.

The pass coverage looked absolutely awful for the majority of the game with the Giants seemingly sticking with the same zone that has not worked all year.

https://gmenhq.com/2021/10/18/ny-giants-blowout-loss-rams-key-stats/3/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

And some people are worried about this game…

The Giants offense is a mirror image of the Panthers offense. Only difference is the Panthers starting WRs are going to play in this game. 

Panthers defense has more talent and should be the difference in the game. But who knows, it'll probably be a shitty game where both teams try to find new and creative ways to lose.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hepcat said:

The Giants offense is a mirror image of the Panthers offense. Only difference is the Panthers starting WRs are going to play in this game. 

Panthers defense has more talent and should be the difference in the game. But who knows, it'll probably be a shitty game where both teams try to find new and creative ways to lose.

I expect they will be rather generous with their attempts to hand us a victory. I predict 3 TO's for the Giants. I am sure we will cough up at least one(most likely Darnold again).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It goes deeper than that for me. When I started watching the Panthers as a kid I fell in love with Mark Fields’ story during that SB run. He wore #58. Then TD wore it and kept the tradition of the being the soul of the Panthers. The next time someone wears #58 I hope brings that same spirit 
    • T-Mac is a nickname, Tet is a shortening of Tetairoa. Like you said below... your name is Jonathan, I could see "Jonny" being considered a nickname, but Jon isn't a nickname, it's a shortening of Johnathan, see the difference? And if your mom named you Jonathan for it's biblical significance/meaning, because she was very religious, I think it would be different. T-Mac is Polynesian, so much in their culture has deeper meaning for them, particularly names.  So for his mom to feel this way, I highly doubt it's just because she likes the name Tetairoa and not Tet, it's much more likely than not to be because the name itself has a deeper meaning in their culture.   Particularly as T-Mac himself has often talked about how much his Polynesian heritage means to himself and his family. And no, I'm not saying all this because of how much he's my guy, if he was just "normal american" and his name was Jonathan and he didn't like fans calling him Jon, I'd probably just say tough poo.  It's that he's Polynesian and I know things like names have a much deeper meaning in their culture than they do in ours for the most part. For whatever it's worth, a quick google search.......
    • All that mess for a solid 6. Come on Bill do better
×
×
  • Create New...