Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

When did you give up on Matt Rhule?


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

You lost already... You tried to compare situation.. Proven wrong..

I'm editing adding more info.. Clap your hands and jump for joy on that..lol

You're just machine gun blasting excuses. Most of which were decisions made by Rhule himself. There were five new head coaches for the 2020 season. The only one with a worse record than Rhule blew us out today. He only has one less win than Rhule now. 

You want to make excuses and accept a loser. That's fine. Based on your ability to argue a point and formulate a coherent thought, you've become quite accustomed to embracing the L.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You're just machine gun blasting excuses. Most of which were decisions made by Rhule himself. There were five new head coaches for the 2020 season. The only one with a worse record than Rhule blew us out today. He only has one less win than Rhule now. 

You want to make excuses and accept a loser. That's fine. Based on your ability to argue a point and formulate a coherent thought, you've become quite accustomed to embracing the L.

Excuses whatever.. Who gives up on a coach after a year and a half?? Especially when his 1st season was one of the most difficult seasons in sports history??

Give me and example when this was done and considered smart??

Im waiting 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

"MUH PANDEMIC" doesn't explain why this team is looking worse than last year. We were losing by very close games last year except the buc games. now we're getting dominated by the giants.

No, no, no. He moved on from that excuse. Now it's that we're such a young team with a college coaching staff. Guess who made those decisions?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WOW!! said:

Excuses whatever.. Who gives up on a coach after a year and a half?? Especially when his 1st season was one of the most difficult seasons in sports history??

Give me and example when this was done and considered smart??

Im waiting 

He fuging sucks. Anyone with two eyes and a brain could see that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Excuses whatever.. Who gives up on a coach after a year and a half?? Especially when his 1st season was one of the most difficult seasons in sports history??

Give me and example when this was done and considered smart??

Im waiting 

Firing an NFL coach after one season usually ends up working out

https://ftw.usatoday.com/2013/12/nfl-one-and-done-chudzinski-carroll-mora-schottenheimer

You didn't expect that one coming. Walked right into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

"MUH PANDEMIC" doesn't explain why this team is looking worse than last year. We were losing by very close games last year except the buc games. now we're getting dominated by the giants.

The season hasn't played out yet... We won't know its worst until the end of the season..

Maybe you should check your expectations 1st.. 

Reality check .. If Sam Darnold was good and CMC got hurt this wasn't going to be a good team???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

@WOW!!

how long are you giving rhule before its time to sink or swim?????

3 years.. Like most teams normally do... 

Again if we would have fired ROn in the middle of year 2.. How would that have worked out.. 2 coach of the year season not here..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WOW!! said:

Excuses whatever.. Who gives up on a coach after a year and a half?? Especially when his 1st season was one of the most difficult seasons in sports history??

Give me and example when this was done and considered smart??

Im waiting 

Plenty of teams have moved on from coaches after two years….

you could start with looking at the list of college HCs that for NFL jobs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...