Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold will be Jimmy Clausen 2.0


PanthersGOATFan336
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Sam is more disappointing than Pickles, even if Clausen was worse under center. 

 

I’d cast my vote for Jimmy Jam. 

Sam is just doing what he has done for now 4 straight years 

I didn’t like Jimmy from the jump but his level of suck was more surprising just because we hadn’t witnessed it in the NFL yet IMO.  Jimmy didn’t even look like he had played a Notre Dame.  Looked like he pulled a Kobe or Lebron and just came out of HS.   So bad.  Man he was bad.    Mel Kiper still showing up to work after his mouth wrote that check too

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I’d cast my vote for Jimmy Jam. 

Sam is just doing what he has done for now 4 straight years 

I didn’t like Jimmy from the jump but his level of suck was more surprising just because we hadn’t witnessed it in the NFL yet IMO. 

Wait so sam isnt as bad because he has been doing it for 4 years? NYJ didnt like sam from jump either..look at his highlights i promise you its only 30 seconds long

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

Was he tho?

 

Darnold was a top 3 pick that, in conjunction with the Jets, hoodwinked us and others into thinking that he was somehow better than what he put on tape--so much so that we gave up not only a second but a fourth round draft pick for him. And, we gave him an extension because our HC AND our GM, the scouting gurus, had everyone thinking that Darnold had some untapped potential to be a franchise QB.

Clausen was just another failed rookie QB who was in over his head. And he wasn't even a first rounder. He had way less expectations than Darnold.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...