Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold will be Jimmy Clausen 2.0


PanthersGOATFan336
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Sam is more disappointing than Pickles, even if Clausen was worse under center. 

 

I’d cast my vote for Jimmy Jam. 

Sam is just doing what he has done for now 4 straight years 

I didn’t like Jimmy from the jump but his level of suck was more surprising just because we hadn’t witnessed it in the NFL yet IMO.  Jimmy didn’t even look like he had played a Notre Dame.  Looked like he pulled a Kobe or Lebron and just came out of HS.   So bad.  Man he was bad.    Mel Kiper still showing up to work after his mouth wrote that check too

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I’d cast my vote for Jimmy Jam. 

Sam is just doing what he has done for now 4 straight years 

I didn’t like Jimmy from the jump but his level of suck was more surprising just because we hadn’t witnessed it in the NFL yet IMO. 

Wait so sam isnt as bad because he has been doing it for 4 years? NYJ didnt like sam from jump either..look at his highlights i promise you its only 30 seconds long

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

Was he tho?

 

Darnold was a top 3 pick that, in conjunction with the Jets, hoodwinked us and others into thinking that he was somehow better than what he put on tape--so much so that we gave up not only a second but a fourth round draft pick for him. And, we gave him an extension because our HC AND our GM, the scouting gurus, had everyone thinking that Darnold had some untapped potential to be a franchise QB.

Clausen was just another failed rookie QB who was in over his head. And he wasn't even a first rounder. He had way less expectations than Darnold.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So you can explain how he was top 10....but won't.  We need to look it up ourselves?  I googled it.  Can't find the argument based on stats and facts. 
    • Well, I think Nike has it all down to a sweet mathematical science to max revenue of what they average person will buy in terms of price....and what the average person will do with a dirty jersey.   Then they construct them accordingly.   and yeah, it's not about being tackled in them but I'm sure Nike knows exactly how each tier will react to washings...and then sunlight, heat, fading and on and on.    Just asking google about it there are tons of tiktoks, you tubes, reddit posts, etc with folks complaining about what a simple wash can do to a new one.    Your washing machine gets cooler tech....so you pay more now and it doesn't last as long .  My son's football cleats that help max speed got a hole in them before they even made it into the season this past year.     Now our football jersey's are lightweight with new mesh because it's totally better.....the end game is always because the big corporations have found the synergy between new and improved and not lasting as long.  That's my take.  I think everything is made to wear out sooner under the guise of but it's better today. 
    • I know Svech is hot but I still like Jarvy with Aho's line
×
×
  • Create New...