Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College to NFL coaching success


Eazy-E
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Eazy-E said:

Exactly hiring Rhule and giving him that massive contract was a huge dumb mistake. Oh yeah and to top it off, allow him to hire a coaching staff of even more college coaches with no NFL experience. Recipe for disaster.

I agree with the college coaches are rarely ever successful in the NFL.  I’m never opposed to a retread depending on who it is AND I’d prefer that over a college coach.  Maybe Rhule will pan out, I’ll stay hopeful …. BUT like you said , I think then having an entire staff of college coaches and one, Brady, I don’t think was even a coordinator in college was a mistake.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

posted in another thread: 

I have also learned my lesson on college coaches making the jump to the NFL.  It just doesn't work (outside of maybe Pete Carroll).  College football and the NFL are just entirely different environments which require skill sets tailored to them in order to succeed:

College Head Coach - be a good salesman / politician to recruit the top talent & then coast on that talent for most of the season.  Only have to really game plan for 2 or 3 games a year.  Mostly just play golf with big Uni donors in the offseason and simply enjoy life.  Prime example:  Nick Saban

NFL Head Coach - be an insane film junkie.  Work 18 hours a day every day to find the smallest flaw in your opponent to exploit.  With the salary cap & draft, talent levels across the league are fairly equal.  So the team that prepares the best will usually win games.  Have zero personality or life outside of football and be 100% committed to outworking your rivals.   Prime example:  Bill Belichick

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BlitzMonster said:

posted in another thread: 

I have also learned my lesson on college coaches making the jump to the NFL.  It just doesn't work (outside of maybe Pete Carroll).  College football and the NFL are just entirely different environments which require skill sets tailored to them in order to succeed:

College Head Coach - be a good salesman / politician to recruit the top talent & then coast on that talent for most of the season.  Only have to really game plan for 2 or 3 games a year.  Mostly just play golf with big Uni donors in the offseason and simply enjoy life.  Prime example:  Nick Saban

NFL Head Coach - be an insane film junkie.  Work 18 hours a day every day to find the smallest flaw in your opponent to exploit.  With the salary cap & draft, talent levels across the league are fairly equal.  So the team that prepares the best will usually win games.  Have zero personality or life outside of football and be 100% committed to outworking your rivals.   Prime example:  Bill Belichick

Remember Phil Snow saying Dallas ran some thing they didn't see on film? fuging Duh that's what happens and if you can't adjust you shouldn't be in the NFL. I like Snow overall but he has the same issue as Rhule and Brady not having any answers for halftime adjustments if your initial game plan isn't working. You'd think that Dallas game 6-7 weeks ago would have had him come up with a scheme to combat that style of play but nope

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Remember Phil Snow saying Dallas ran some thing they didn't see on film? fuging Duh that's what happens and if you can't adjust you shouldn't be in the NFL. I like Snow overall but he has the same issue as Rhule and Brady not having any answers for halftime adjustments if your initial game plan isn't working. You'd think that Dallas game 6-7 weeks ago would have had him come up with a scheme to combat that style of play but nope

Very good point.  The ability to make quick, effective adjustments in-game & at half time separates the men from the boys in the NFL.  

But I'd say that a lot of that skill at adjustments comes from the coach's encyclopedic knowledge of the game.  And much of that is knowledge is from all those hours and hours and years of film study.  Luck Is What Happens When Preparation Meets Opportunity"

Edited by BlitzMonster
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, BlitzMonster said:

Seattle coach Pete Carrol 

USC (2001–2009)

Seattle Seahawks (2010–present)

2014 Super Bowl winner

Pete the Cheat broke every rule in the book at USC and only went on the NFL because his team was getting hammered by the NCAA. They still haven’t recovered from Pete the Cheat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Pete the Cheat broke every rule in the book at USC and only went on the NFL because his team was getting hammered by the NCAA. They still haven’t recovered from Pete the Cheat. 

Not sure you can say he was ‘straight from college’ either. He had decent NFL experience unlike Rhule and Johnson.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Eazy-E said:

The Seahawks were Pete Carrols 3rd head coaching gig in the NFL.

Try again.

The answer for your question was correct.  Pete Carroll came directly from USC and won a Super Bowl. 

I think this is the question you wanted to have answered:

"Tell me, who was the last NFL coach that only had NCAA experience to win a Super Bowl? I’ll give you a hint, it wasn’t even in this century."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BlitzMonster said:

The answer for your question was correct.  Pete Carroll came directly from USC and won a Super Bowl. 

I think this is the question you wanted to have answered:

"Tell me, who was the last NFL coach that only had NCAA experience to win a Super Bowl? I’ll give you a hint, it wasn’t even in this century."

That question was directed at another poster as it was pertaining to the entire point of the original thread.

The way you rewrote it was how it was intended to be asked.

Sorry for the confusion 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I definitely agree with Easy-E that guys with little to no NFL experience turn out to be bad NFL coaches.  I just think the game is surprisingly different between the two leagues.  

Strangely enough Rhule actually had a year as an offensive line coach for the Giants in 2012.  And even with that time he still is making a lot of rookie mistakes.  

I think the much better plan is for team owners to hire one of the accomplished, long term assistant NFL coaches as a new head coach.  A top OC or DC has a much better idea of what it takes to win at the professional level.  They still have a lot to learn about the additional coaching duties that a head coach performs.  But they are much closer to a finished product than hiring a college head coach.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...