Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Comparing resumés


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, thennek said:

Nixon is OC for 5-games and that is it. This move looks like desperation. Firing Brady needed to be done but it did not fix the multiple problems this team has. 
Rhule should be fired just on how poorly the QB situation was handled. A rebuilding team giving away valuable draft picks with little value in return is another fireable offense. 

Then alot of coaches would be fired for how bad their QB decision were at their 1st pro job..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, micnificent28 said:

I Think Brady was the scape goat for a head coach in a bad position with plenty of flaws and a situation not totally his fault. Your asking him to make magic with line that is giving no Qb time to go through reads. a rookie RB half the time because the star all world Hb is always injuired with Sam Darnold.

His inexperience was also at fault..

Rhule big mistake just like Ron's 1st few years was not having Atleast 1 of his coordinators with NFL experience on the staff.. Maybe even a former head coach to help him... 

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

His inexperience was also at fault..

Rhule big mistake just like Ron's 1st few years was not having Atleast 1 of his coordinators with NFL experience on the staff.. Maybe even a former head coach to help him... 

I mean its hard to know if he was in over his head or not given what he was working with. Teddy was productive enough to win some game offense was miles better than this darnold era crap without CMC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm honestly more struck by just how little experience Joe Brady actually had before he was handed the Panthers OC job.

Yea made this point so many times when you were out. The con man got conned...or did the same man get conned lol. Too much dumb around here

Edited by Fox007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good post.  Definitely appeared to me as it was based on past performance and I was ok with that. His tone seemed to be bullish as well but the team ended up at 28 as a starting point. I personally don’t think they finish here but in my mind this is the right realm for preseason rankings.  I think the team has a lot to prove.  How fast can the rookies get up to speed, can the 2nd year players make the jump (coaching, player development), can DB come back to form from the injury, etc…    
    • If you are an athlete or former athlete (myself?  Cornhole 2021-present; Disc Golf 2013-got a mega blister and had to retire; speed walking--every black Friday at Walmart 2003-2009) you know what it is to lose confidence.  Self-inflicted or not (in my view, a lot of 2023 was coaching and a lot of 2024 was confidence), he has confidence now. How fragile is it?  I think the light is on, the game slowed down, and he is ready to do his thing.  He seems to be "mobile in the pocket" instead of "running scared."   Last year, there were times when AT was out, Johnson gone, and all he really had was XL and Coker--a raw rookie with upside and an UDFA rookie.  TE was rarely a viable option. It reminded me of Benjamin and Funchess.   Moore had to step up.  This season, Bryce has weapons.  I expect XL to improve.  I expect TMac to help tremendously, and I think Coker will be solid.  Renfrow?  Horn?  bonuses.    
    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
×
×
  • Create New...