Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nobody talking about Minshew?


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

I agree.. Still don't want to act like Tribusky, Minshew or whatever backup QB you ppl come up with are good..

I don't think anyone is trying to argue that they're "good". They were simply far more palatable options than the options we ultimately chose, primarily due to the reality that we would've had way loess resources invested in them.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Teddy is the same pedestrian player he was with us, just on a bit better of a team. He's always going to be one of those marginal starter/good backup types. Kinda like Minshew.

Teddy can actually work the Game manager thing to a winning season.. That's the difference between him Darnold, Trubisky and Minshew.. All who proven they can't even be consistent at that..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think anyone is trying to argue that they're "good". They were simply far more palatable options than the options we ultimately chose, primarily due to the reality that we would've had way loess resources invested in them.

Yes palatable "being" your still a losing team with no future at QB but you keep the compensations from sorry Darnold deal.. I agree.. But they still suck they aren't franchise QB so stop lusting for them to be our QB.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Yes palatable "being" your still a losing team with no future at QB but you keep the compensations from sorry Darnold deal.. I agree.. But they still suck they aren't franchise QB so stop lusting for them to be our QB.. 

You gotta stop overstating things. No one is "lusting" after these guys. We just didn't want to spend all those resources pursuing trash. Myself and many others said this all along. Why Panthers brass thought Teddy and Darnold would prove to be something other than what they'd always proven to be I have no clue, especially when guys who have played better were available for way less.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You gotta stop overstating things. No one is "lusting" after these guys. We just didn't want to spend all those resources pursuing trash. Myself and many others said this all along. Why Panthers brass thought Teddy and Darnold would prove to be something other than what they'd always proven to be I have no clue, especially when guys who have played better were available for way less.

You're making threads about them why??

Why even have a discussion about other trash QBs???

This thread was a attempt to be "I told you so" Bs about a garbage QB winning a game.. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

12 INTs, 6 fumbles. Teddy last year? 11 INTs and 6 fumbles, but 9 fewer TDs.

Teddy last year 1st year on a new team (new coaches,)  with no offseason (pandemic) season with the youngest defense in the league during a rebuild..

Context..

Trubisky 2018 had a year in the system with a top 5 defense..

Difference..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...