Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nobody talking about Minshew?


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, ChibCU said:

I'm confused. Are there people in this thread saying Minshew is not good enough to be rostered by the Carolina Panthers? The Carolina Panthers - biggest joke of a franchise atm when it comes to QB decisions. We're paying our replacement, replacement's replacement, and the QB originally replaced. All while having one of the worst offenses in the NFL.

But nah... let's act like a solid QB on his rookie contract for the price of a third-day draft pick would have made this franchise worse than it is.

For real. Minshew is better than any QB we have under contract next year and that's not debatable. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

I posted above you, by two posts and discussed some of this "garbage" time stuff. He's basically the same QB across the board in terms of how he performs relative to the score. 

 

I don't care about garbage time or not garbage time numbers..

I don't want a QB barley putting up 20 tds a season in the 1st place.. 

16 tds and 5 ints is a crappy season to me..

Cam 1st 4 years avg. 30 tds a season.. That's what I fuging want..

I've grown up I'm tired of watching Jake Delhome type QBS who need everything around them to be perfect to have success..

I'd rather swing for top talented athletes or wait to draft it then to stay in mediocre for years with a career Backup squeezing out wins and keeping us irrelevant..

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Difference.. No matter what you think Darnold has physical talent that any coach worth his pedigree thinks he can work with... Big Arm, Athletic,  and Good size.. 

Minshew ..short, Below avg arm, not a great athlete.. 

So you swing for the talent that you hope can develop into the top 5 pick all scouts thought he was... It didn't work.. But that is the way things usually happen for highly drafted players..

Minshew is just a fever dream where some of you are always trying to find a diamond in the ruff.. But it ends up to be the same coal that got a bunch of stats in garbage time..

I agree with this. At the time I really thought we got a steal for Darnold. A top 5 QB for a few picks. If he would have shown anything this year it would have been a steal. 

I didnt like how quick they were at picking up his 5th year option but I can understand it. They clearly thought 'he was the guy' and that 19M would have been 30+ IF he played good. So the finances made sense. 

That said, he didnt play good. However, I think we need to keep him on the team, let him watch from the sidelines and see what he is in training camp. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

For real. Minshew is better than any QB we have under contract next year and that's not debatable. 

And that's how bad the situation is.. 

Fitzpatrick is better then any QB on the roster.. That still doesn't make him a good QB to go into the season with..

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthera onca said:

Minshew would have been a much better option than Sam. Less draft capital, less money against the cap, and likely better play. Minshew is like Heineke, he has that will to win and is a baller.

This is Kyle Allen all over again..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I really fuging hate analytics.. It constantly makes sub par player look good to ppl.. 

Instead of watching the games and seeing the guy wasn't that good and talent is mostly lucky poo!  

What was the offensive ranked the years he was QB?? 

Were they a pass happy team or a running team that didn't trust the QB to do alot??

Compensation is the only reason your yelling Minshew.. But reality is if Minshew was brought here he wouldn't look any better and it would have been a clear sign to the fan base we are tanking..

They threw the ball 12th most in the NFL and only had 3 more rushes than us. 17th in rushing yards and 16th in passing yards. Despite all those throws they were tied for 5th least intercepted team in the NFL. The Jaguars hurt themselves via penalties that year. Second most penalties for the most yards in the NFL. 

Compensation absolutely is not the only reason I am "yelling" for Minshew. Weird to tell others why they are doing X Y or Z and be inaccurate. I wanted Minshew before he got traded to the Eagles. And again... both of Minshews scores yesterday came with the team down, in the first half. Not garbage time at all. I watched the game though and the analytics backed that up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CanadianCat said:

I agree with this. At the time I really thought we got a steal for Darnold. A top 5 QB for a few picks. If he would have shown anything this year it would have been a steal. 

I didnt like how quick they were at picking up his 5th year option but I can understand it. They clearly thought 'he was the guy' and that 19M would have been 30+ IF he played good. So the finances made sense. 

That said, he didnt play good. However, I think we need to keep him on the team, let him watch from the sidelines and see what he is in training camp. 

I understand the thought process other then giving him the 5th year option... But reality is he can't read defenses and is broken mentally.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

They threw the ball 12th most in the NFL and only had 3 more rushes than us. 17th in rushing yards and 16th in passing yards. Despite all those throws they were tied for 5th least intercepted team in the NFL. The Jaguars hurt themselves via penalties that year. Second most penalties for the most yards in the NFL. 

Compensation absolutely is not the only reason I am "yelling" for Minshew. Weird to tell others why they are doing X Y or Z and be inaccurate. I wanted Minshew before he got traded to the Eagles. And again... both of Minshews scores yesterday came with the team down, in the first half. Not garbage time at all. I watched the game though and the analytics backed that up. 

I got 100 dollars that say Minshew will never be a fulltime starter of a winning team because.. He is nothing but a intangibles guy with no physical talent and pretty much a career backup good for 4 or 5 games until teams figure him out again and again and again..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthera onca said:

I would rather we stuck with him as well over Sam or Teddy. We would have likely had the number one pick last year without losing the draft capital and throwing so much money at Teddy and Sam. It really is front office malpractice. 

We should have stuck with Cam and if he got hurt still be in close to a top 5 pick..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I don't care about garbage time or not garbage time numbers..

I don't want a QB barley putting up 20 tds a season in the 1st place.. 

16 tds and 5 ints is a crappy season to me..

Cam 1st 4 years avg. 30 tds a season.. That's what I fuging want..

I've grown up I'm tired of watching Jake Delhome type QBS who need everything around them to be perfect to have success..

I'd rather swing for top talented athletes or wait to draft it then to stay in mediocre for years with a career Backup squeezing out wins and keeping us irrelevant..

Again, you just complained about analytics and then misused them to disparage Minshew with the "barley putting up 20 TDs a season". In his first year he put up 20 in rookie campaign and in year 2 his 16 touchdowns were in 8 starts. On pace for 32. Not bad for a second year player on a franchise that was tanking. Minshew would be the best QB we have had on this roster since prime Cam. And Minshew doesn't need everything around him to be perfect to have success. He has had success for two years and in his only start this year he had success. And the Jaguars and Eagles have far from perfect rosters. We would be a playoff team with him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I got 100 dollars that say Minshew will never be a fulltime starter of a winning team because.. He is nothing but a intangibles guy with no physical talent and pretty much a career backup good for 4 or 5 games until teams figure him out again and again and again..

Again, if that were true his numbers would reflect that. The only quarter of the schedule he has ever struggled is the weeks 9-12. 

15:5 in weeks 1-4.

11:2 in weeks 5-8.

1:3 in weeks 9-12.

12:1 in weeks 13+.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Varking said:

Again, you just complained about analytics and then misused them to disparage Minshew with the "barley putting up 20 TDs a season". In his first year he put up 20 in rookie campaign and in year 2 his 16 touchdowns were in 8 starts. On pace for 32. Not bad for a second year player on a franchise that was tanking. Minshew would be the best QB we have had on this roster since prime Cam. And Minshew doesn't need everything around him to be perfect to have success. He has had success for two years and in his only start this year he had success. And the Jaguars and Eagles have far from perfect rosters. We would be a playoff team with him. 

He will always be injured or always need things to be great around him to barely put up those numbers is the point.. Maybe 1 or twice in 5 years will he make a full season.. He college years was just like this at Washington state... He isn't physically good nor does he have arm talent.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • i find this to be alarming on so many levels  im going to change the order of the portions i copied from Joe’s article i  really have serious doubts   about Canales’ common sense  1. A running team forgetting to run  2. Making this game plan about Young’s passing game momentum .  Total idiot.  It is about winning games not about young’s momentum. That is what practice is for , not live games  god help us all.    Article below  Confused by the Panthers’ pass-heavy play calls vs. 49ers? Rico Dowdle probably was, too   CHARLOTTE, N.C. — In two seasons here, Canales has juggled offensive play calling with his head coach responsibilities. Sometimes the balls end up on the floor. In two critical moments Monday night, Canales chose to go with a pass in situations where a handoff would have been the more direct approach. The first was the disastrous, first-and-goal play from the 1 where Bryce Young opted against running in for the score and instead lobbed the ball toward rookie Mitchell Evans, only to see safety Ji’Ayir Brown come down with it. The second one was just as perplexing. When the 49ers were whistled for roughing long snapper J.J. Jansen on Ryan Fitzgerald’s successful PAT pulled the Panthers to 17-10, Canales took the point off the board and went for a 2-pointer from the 1. But Canales ran a play that didn’t take advantage of the spot, with Young missing Jalen Coker in the back of the end zone. (Rookie wideout Jimmy Horn Jr. appeared to be the first read in the flat.) Canales said after the game he wanted to build on Young’s record-breaking passing performance in Atlanta, and thought the line was protecting well. But that lack of rhythm Canales mentioned was the result of never giving Dowdle the opportunity to get into it. When Dowdle ripped off a 17-yard gain on the first offensive play of the second half, Canales came back to him two plays later. It was his final carry.   After an overnight, cross-country flight, Rico Dowdle began his Tuesday — at least on social media — with an emoji. Dowdle’s post on Xcontained no words accompanying the face with spiral eyes emoji, which EmojiTerra tells us symbolizes “confusion, dizziness, overwhelm or being utterly shocked.” Per the website, it’s often used to convey “feeling dazed, hypnotized, or caught off-guard in troubling or surprising situations.” It’s not hard to figure out why the Carolina Panthers running back would be feeling some or all of those emotions. Dowdle has been one of the Panthers’ fun, feel-good stories this season, an Asheville native who signed a prove-it deal with his home-state team and then got right to the business of proving it. Before the Panthers hosted the Dallas Cowboys in Week 6, Dowdle warned his former team to “buckle up,” then backed up his words by running for 183 yards and racking up 239 yards from scrimmage. But in a 20-9 loss to the San Francisco 49ers on Monday night, it was Dowdle who was buckled up. And the guy who strapped Dowdle into a safety harness and threw on the child-safety locks was none other than Panthers coach Dave Canales. Dowdle led all backs Monday — including Christian McCaffrey — by averaging 6.3 yards per carry. But while 49ers coach Kyle Shanahan was feeding McCaffrey a cornucopia of 24 carries and 31 touches, Dowdle finished with a meager six rushing attempts. That matched his season low from a loss at Arizona in Week 2, when Chuba Hubbard was still RB1 and the Panthers were throwing nearly every down in the second half trying to catch up. Dowdle wasn’t the only back Canales dissed. Hubbard had just three carries and the Panthers finished with 13 as a team, tied for the fifth fewest in franchise history. Some of it was about opportunity, or lack of it. With the 49ers’ two touchdown drives consuming more than 16 minutes, the Panthers ran just 43 offensive plays, which matched their low under Canales and tied for the second fewest in team history. But Canales, who arrived in Charlotte last year preaching the balanced offense gospel, conceded Tuesday that he didn’t emphasize the running plays on his call sheet nearly enough. “Offensively, just could not get our rhythm going. And really it just started off with the run game. I have to make sure that that comes alive,” he said during an opening statement to reporters. “That’s a part of who we are. It’s a part of what we believe in. We have two great backs that contribute to this team. The offensive line was blocking well and that was a missed opportunity by me. And I’ll do better in that regard.”        
    • IMO 2027 is the year we draft a QB. But for 2026 we should bring in a vet or 2 AND Bryce.  Canales says he wants to promote competition.. let them duke it out. Top 2 make the team.  I honestly done care who wins, but whoever does is on a short leash.   
    • The charge of a head coach is to win games. The rest of it is just horseshit. So, ultimately, he is to blame for the perplexing losses when he willingly sets us up to fail. I have zero use for a head coach that is some stooge worried about front office or ownership decisions above the goal of success and winning. That's Dave Canales. He is the one that seemingly cares more about every aspect that doesn't have to do with winning. 
×
×
  • Create New...