Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Tepper a bottom 5 owner?


Is Tepper Bottom 5  

96 members have voted

  1. 1. Well, is he?

    • Yes
      66
    • No
      30


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Cary Kollins said:


the jaguars have been terrible for two decades. Their current owner has been in place over ten years. 

If Tepper is still flailing to find a coach in year eleven, fair enough. 

I don't think most people have the patience to devote their time to / spend their hard earned money on a team that might be good seven years from now.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't think most people have the patience to devote their time to / spend their hard earned money on a team that might be good seven years from now.


Who’s saying that lol, nice straw man. My response was in regards to you comparing the panthers to the Jags, which is ridiculous at face value. All I’m saying is people claiming Tepper is one of the worst owners in the league 3.5 years into the gig is a childish overreaction, which is not uncommon on sports message boards. 

Edited by Cary Kollins
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Cary Kollins said:

Who’s saying that lol, nice straw man. My response was in regards to you comparing the panthers to the Jags, which is ridiculous at face value. All I’m saying is people claiming Tepper is one of the worst owners in the league 3.5 years into the gig is a childish overreaction, which is not uncommon on sports message boards. 

It's not a comparison of the Panthers and Jags. It's an example showing the silliness of suggesting that better facilities equals good ownership.

Do you have any evidence to offer on the football side of the equation that would support the notion of David Tepper being a good owner?

Not facilities, not investments, not anything besides the actual on the field product...

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/8/2022 at 5:12 PM, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

Depends on the metric.  In terms of actual results on the field yeah, Carolina is one of the true shitcan teams.  For actual football Tepper is bottom five.

For other aspects, Dan Snyder is the worst person to own an NFL franchise and it's not close.  Kroenke and Spanos basically told their original host cities and fans to go fug themselves.  The McNairs are documented assholes.  Up until very recently Bucs fans didn't have anything good to say about the Glazers.  Of course the Lions are perennial garbage.

e: Tom Benson was a scumbag too.  He was actively working toward moving the Saints out of New Orleans after Katrina until Paul Tagliabue basically talked him out of it.

Your post took a weird turn with the Ford's.  The Ford's are bad owners...for results on the football field.  For much of everything else they are actually pretty good owner's.  

I would swap out the Lions for the Bengals.  That guy is a trip if you start digging deep into the details.  Before Marvin Lewis got to the Bengals, players were not allowed to take Gatorade home.  That's a small example of how cheap and far behind they were...and they haven't caught all the way up yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LaMelo to Brooklyn for Nic Claxton, Drake Powell, and a pick.  Who says no? 
    • Appreciate you, brother!  I know it was lengthy, but I felt whoever actually read it would appreciate it.
    • Damn good take, brother.  I think I take that poo personally because (sidebar: I don’t like to use narcissist often because social media has made it a buzzword and diluted the meaning, so when I use it, I don’t take it lightly) I grew up in a home with a raging narcissist, then married a narcissist and just came out of a divorce after a 20 year marriage with her, where afterwards she met and married another narcissist.🤣  And in my dealings with them, over my 41 years on this earth, at times I took great delight in breaking down their arguments point by point and forcing them to either acknowledge their wrongs and take ownership of them or watch them yammer and stammer away when they ran out of lies and excuses.  At various points, that was extremely satisfying, but ultimately, which I’ve realized especially after the last 3 years and going through the divorce and everything, it does NOTHING to them.  It doesn’t affect them one way or another.  For a logical, reasonable, grounded person, you would think calling them in their poo will bring it to their attention when they’re face when nothing but facts and truth and force them to change, but nope.  Not in the slightest.  They just disassociate from the ones who do that and find more people who will validate their behaviors and thinking.  poo pisses me off because they’re so destructive and couldn’t care less so long as their needs are met.
×
×
  • Create New...