Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2022 Charlotte FC Game Thread


MillionDollarCam
 Share

Recommended Posts

IMG_1062.thumb.JPG.885a62e4ab23a16e52afe0e3d10747ff.JPG

Here is my view in my season ticket seats at Austin FC's stadium. We beat Miami 5-1 yesterday. Scored 10 goals in the first two games, an MLS record.

Austin FC is going to beat the sh*t out of Charlotte FC on June 30. 

So glad I don't have to support another team owned by David Tepper. Austin FC is owned by a previously successful MLS owner and Matthew McConaughey. I'll probably get to see them win a championship in my lifetime. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, hepcat said:

IMG_1062.thumb.JPG.885a62e4ab23a16e52afe0e3d10747ff.JPG

Here is my view in my season ticket seats at Austin FC's stadium. We beat Miami 5-1 yesterday. Scored 10 goals in the first two games, an MLS record.

Austin FC is going to beat the sh*t out of Charlotte FC on June 30. 

So glad I don't have to support another team owned by David Tepper. Austin FC is owned by a previously successful MLS owner and Matthew McConaughey. I'll probably get to see them win a championship in my lifetime. 

Good for you. Now go post this in an Austin FC forum and GTFO unless you have something relevant to say about Charlotte FC. Bye-Bye. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say that between hard-working, accomplished guys like Premier League champion/resident ambassador Christian Fuchs (in many ways, the Greg Olsen or Thomas Davis of Charlotte FC) as well as promising youngsters like No. 1 overall pick Ben Bender and hometown hero Jaylin Lindsey, this team is pretty likable.

Now, score a damn goal this weekend!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, hepcat said:

IMG_1062.thumb.JPG.885a62e4ab23a16e52afe0e3d10747ff.JPG

Here is my view in my season ticket seats at Austin FC's stadium. We beat Miami 5-1 yesterday. Scored 10 goals in the first two games, an MLS record.

Austin FC is going to beat the sh*t out of Charlotte FC on June 30. 

So glad I don't have to support another team owned by David Tepper. Austin FC is owned by a previously successful MLS owner and Matthew McConaughey. I'll probably get to see them win a championship in my lifetime. 

Only seven more wins and you match last seasons total!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...