Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pro bowl guard cut

Pazhoosier89

By Pazhoosier89,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Smittymoose Experienced

Smittymoose

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

There are some players who won't, but believe it or not every NFL player is not necessarily Rod Tidwell.

Believe it or not, the bulk of players do not make it very far into even multi-year deals.

Here's a good study: https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2019/3/15/18266458/free-agent-contracts-guaranteed-money-how-long-do-deals-last

You are really overrating how much perceived stability matters other than to potentially the very upper-crust of free agency. Of guys who sign two-year deals, more than 54% never even see that second year. NFL Free Agency is primarily about identifying opportunity to make a roster. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricky Spanish Grand Master

Ricky Spanish

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Smittymoose said:

They will have positive feelings about getting paid millions of dollars. This isn't the NBA. Vets, especially average vets unlikely to get more than a 1/2 year deal, are taking the best combination of money/opportunity they can get on the market more often than not. And there is plenty of opportunity on the Carolina OL to come in and win a starting job. 

Again, why would they come here then?

Both Miami and Cincy have more money, they can outbid us. Cincy just went to the super bowl in spite of their terrible line and Miami has the benefit of being a really nice place near the beach as well as no state income tax so that's even MORE money they get to keep.

"We have opportunity to start!"

Yeah, that's about all we have to offer. We don't have the money, the location, or the prestige to offer that many other franchises do at the moment. 

I anticipate us scraping the bottom of the barrel in terms of quality linemen in FA this offseason, unless we overpay, which will do nothing but hurt us long term. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Smittymoose said:

Believe it or not, the bulk of players do not make it very far into even multi-year deals.

Here's a good study: https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2019/3/15/18266458/free-agent-contracts-guaranteed-money-how-long-do-deals-last

You are really overrating how much perceived stability matters other than to potentially the very upper-crust of free agency. Of guys who sign two-year deals, more than 54% never even see that second year. NFL Free Agency is primarily about identifying opportunity to make a roster. 

That's also because the "bulk" of NFL free agents aren't really that good.

You've got a few top guys who make a lot of money and can afford to be picky. The rest are second tier or role players at best, camp fodder at worst.

That second group is who will be picking from. But again we'll probably have to pay more for them than other teams right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted (edited)

If we are so damn attractive then why did Stafford stiff-arm us out of a trade? 

Yes players do care about destination, at least the ones that have a choice. I don't know how much the 'lame duck HC' thing factors into it or even if how many of the players have the personal skills to manage their career that way (some of these guys are not the brightest), some not all is reasonable. I would imagine that the top shelf players that have better options wouldn't. We can overpay the guys who don't have better options or find guys who buy into what is being sold by the people in charge...like Sam who was both lol.

This crap has been a thing way before Rhule was here, it's just worse now because we haven't won much in the last couple of years and the failure is growing. For a long time we built a niche image where it was a good place to play and live with a family but that is all dead now and not that all players wanted that when we had it. 

Edited by Waldo
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smittymoose Experienced

Smittymoose

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Again, why would they come here then?

Both Miami and Cincy have more money, they can outbid us. Cincy just went to the super bowl in spite of their terrible line and Miami has the benefit of being a really nice place near the beach as well as no state income tax so that's even MORE money they get to keep.

"We have opportunity to start!"

Yeah, that's about all we have to offer. We don't have the money, the location, or the prestige to offer that many other franchises do at the moment. 

Because even if those teams are better options, they're not signing more than two vets in free agency. That's four guys total. There will be more than four decent OLs. And that presupposes we're on the same type of players. Even at the top of the market, Carolina would surely be interested in someone like Armstead, but would Cincinnati? Their needs are really more on the interior. They'd have to bump a good young LT to LG or RT to sign him, which works in Madden, but doesn't always work in real life. 

This fantasy that Carolina is some utterly unattractive destination that no veteran is going to touch with a ten-foot pole in free agency is not grounded in any sort of reality. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Smittymoose said:

Because even if those teams are better options, they're not signing more than two vets in free agency. That's four guys total. There will be more than four decent OLs.. 

There are only two other NFL teams looking to sign offensive linemen?

Well then, that changes everything 😐

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smittymoose Experienced

Smittymoose

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That's also because the "bulk" of NFL free agents aren't really that good.

You've got a few top guys who make a lot of money and can afford to be picky. The rest are second tier or role players at best, camp fodder at worst.

That second group is who will be picking from. But again we'll probably have to pay more for them than other teams right.

This is not reality. According to Spotrac data, 618 guys signed free agent contract last off-season. 524 of those deals were of the one-year variety. Another 55 were two year deals. So 93% of contracts were what I would consider "short-term." 

So really only about 7% of guys fit in our "make a lot of money camp." I do not think the remaining 93% are "second tier or role players at best, camp fodder at worst." Actually, there are a lot of reasonable deals to be had for starters in this range. Using the Bengals as an example, they signed 4 starters (and a number of other contributors) to one-year deals for a team that was coming off of a bad year and went to the Super Bowl

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smittymoose Experienced

Smittymoose

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

There are only two other NFL teams looking to sign offensive linemen?

Well then, that changes everything 😐

Don't be intentionally dull. I was using the examples he gave. Your point, to the extent you have one, is bad, not thoughtful, and lazy. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Smittymoose said:

This is not reality. According to Spotrac data, 618 guys signed free agent contract last off-season. 524 of those deals were of the one-year variety. Another 55 were two year deals. So 93% of contracts were what I would consider "short-term." 

So really only about 7% of guys fit in our "make a lot of money camp." I do not think the remaining 93% are "second tier or role players at best, camp fodder at worst." Actually, there are a lot of reasonable deals to be had for starters in this range. Using the Bengals as an example, they signed 4 starters (and a number of other contributors) to one-year deals for a team that was coming off of a bad year and went to the Super Bowl

You're actually helping make my argument for me.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricky Spanish Grand Master

Ricky Spanish

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Smittymoose said:

Because even if those teams are better options, they're not signing more than two vets in free agency. That's four guys total. There will be more than four decent OLs. And that presupposes we're on the same type of players. Even at the top of the market, Carolina would surely be interested in someone like Armstead, but would Cincinnati? Their needs are really more on the interior. They'd have to bump a good young LT to LG or RT to sign him, which works in Madden, but doesn't always work in real life. 

This fantasy that Carolina is some utterly unattractive destination that no veteran is going to touch with a ten-foot pole in free agency is not grounded in any sort of reality. 

There are other teams besides those two who need OL help. All are more attractive destinations than us on Paper. 

Even if we do attract a guy to come play for us, do you really anticipate he'll be any good? This is the coaching staff that brought in Elflein and Erving day one of FA last offseason (because versatile!) then passed on Slater because he has short arms, then didn't play Christensen at LT until the last two games of the season due to, again, short arms, and then he played the best of any LT on the roster all season...

I don't have faith they even know what a decent OL looks like. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smittymoose Experienced

Smittymoose

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

You're actually helping make my argument for me.

Your argument was that no one good would want to come here, so no I'm not. I'm showing you that there are a lot of quality players that sign short-term, low guarantee deals that have to be primarily motivated to make a roster. You just have a very surface-level understanding of how free agency and contracts work, apparently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smittymoose Experienced

Smittymoose

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

There are other teams besides those two who need OL help. All are more attractive destinations than us on Paper. 

Even if we do attract a guy to come play for us, do you really anticipate he'll be any good? This is the coaching staff that brought in Elflein and Erving day one of FA last offseason (because versatile!) then passed on Slater because he has short arms, then didn't play Christensen at LT until the last two games of the season due to, again, short arms, and then he played the best of any LT on the roster all season...

I don't have faith they even know what a decent OL looks like. 

If the argument is that you don't trust this staff to evaluate the correct targets, that's a different question. And the track record is bad. But there will be numerous quality starters available to Carolina on 1-2 year deals for an affordable price if they pick the right guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smittymoose Experienced

Smittymoose

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

I hope not. He's 30 and has never played a full season. There has also been talk of him needing knee surgery this offseason. If the Panthers want someone else at LT, they need to draft one at 6.

It was just one example. No clue if they're interested. I would not be inclined to give him a mega deal, but they might do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Panthers Fan 69
      Off-season Thread

      By Panthers Fan 69 · Posted

      Necas is going to be stud with a team like leafs that lets their stars shine. I’m going to miss that guy. 
    • Smith
      Sugar Defender Reviews (Thriving in Accomplished Aims) Official Website Alert!

      By Smith · Posted

      ast updated today 19th May 2024 Some people are unsure if Sugar Defender  is real, so here's the truth: there's no evidence that it's a scam. The company clearly lists all the ingredients and doesn't make wild promises. Instead, they support their claims with scientific studies. They have research backing up what they say about Sugar Defender's benefits. Even if some people are skeptical, there's no proof that Sugar Defender is fake. It's important to look at the facts and see that the company is being honest and open about their product.         Order Now Sugar Defender and Get 85% Off   The best part about this supplement is that it's really easy to use, and you don't need to do anything extra to keep your blood sugar levels steady. Plus, it's all-natural and made safely to address the main cause of blood sugar problems.   How long does it take for Sugar Defender to work? How fast Sugar Defender works can be different for each person. It depends on things like how fast your body works, any health issues you already have, and how often you use it. But since they give you 60 days to try it out and get your money back if it doesn't work for you, it's likely that most people see some changes within that time if they use it like they're supposed to. For the best results, use it for at least 90 days.   What Is Sugar Defender? Sugar Defender is a special formula that helps your body respond better to insulin. It's made with the purest ingredients. Every ingredient has been tested many times to make sure they're the best, and the company says there are no stimulants, chemicals, or things that could cause allergies in it. They make it in a super clean lab that follows strict rules. The goal of Sugar Defender is to naturally lower your blood sugar levels and keep them steady and healthy. It's a supplement that won't get you hooked and doesn't have any stimulants or GMOs. And guess what? It's easy to use! Each bottle has enough for a whole month. Just take the right amount every day, and you're all set!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
    • MillionDollarCam
      Off-season Thread

      By MillionDollarCam · Posted

      Agree on Necas, he’s gone. Guentzel seems 50-50 to me, Canes would have to pony up. Still not sure Skjei will be back. From exit interviews he seemed less optimistic than Pesce and I definitely don’t think Pesce is back. Jarvis and Noesen have to be back. I think if Kuzy shoots more he could be a great asset. Put him with a passer like Turbo and a net front like Noesen.
×
×
  • Create New...