Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

There should be no issue with Watson waiving his trade clause per ESPN.


NCTHFL0567
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, PandaMan said:

We’ve pretty much been his last choice all along.  No idea why now he might waive it for us, there are a lot of better teams that are interested 

Per report. He will waive it. So yeah. Better teams? Maybe. But not better for Houston's sake. Trading him to the AFC is a huge L for Houston. Pitt already said they were out. Tampa doesn't have the cap. Seattle doesn't have the players that Houston would covet. So yeah..............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As of this very moment, there are only 9 teams that can afford a Watson trade, one of those teams on this list is actively restructuring contracts daily.....  🤔

1    Indianapolis Colts  
2    Miami Dolphins   
3    Seattle Seahawks    
4    New York Jets  
5    Chicago Bears    
6    Jacksonville Jaguars    
7    Cincinnati Bengals    
8    Las Vegas Raiders    
9    Carolina Panthers

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, La Pantera said:

Sooo, 50 mill for Watson & Armstead? And this seems doable?

Yes. The team acquiring can restructure DW once the ink dries on the trade.

"A simple restructure would allow Watson’s 2022 cap hit to be as low as $9.53 million following a trade." (source: https://overthecap.com/the-cost-of-trading-for-deshaun-watson/)

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

As of this very moment, there are only 9 teams that can afford a Watson trade, one of those teams on this list is actively restructuring contracts daily.....  🤔

1    Indianapolis Colts  
2    Miami Dolphins   
3    Seattle Seahawks    
4    New York Jets  
5    Chicago Bears    
6    Jacksonville Jaguars    
7    Cincinnati Bengals    
8    Las Vegas Raiders    
9    Carolina Panthers

It clearly is Seattle or us at this point.  Please let it be Seattle.  And technically Watson puts us over the cap so we can’t exactly afford him

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, La Pantera said:

Sooo, 50 mill for Watson & Armstead? And this seems doable?

Its plausible, because if we are trading players in return on this deal and not just draft picks, that creates space as well. No telling who it will be, and there isnt mant options that would give us a shitload of money back, but with one or two more restructures and traded player(s)... D Watson and Armstead could happen. It will take some fancy money moves by Samir

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Maybe I am confused but how does that help us in regards to the salary cap? 

Didnt mean to confuse you, I was just stating that the weighted portion of the contract is paid for. So we could extend his deal and spread the numbers out if we end up landing him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Evil Hurney said:

Yes. The team acquiring can restructure DW once the ink dries on the trade.

"A simple restructure would allow Watson’s 2022 cap hit to be as low as $9.53 million following a trade." (source: https://overthecap.com/the-cost-of-trading-for-deshaun-watson/)

This doesnt give me the warm and fuzzies about the situation. 

 

For a team to acquire Watson this year they would need to have $35 million to acquire the contract. Right now the only teams who would be capable of doing that are the Colts, Seahawks, Jets, Dolphins, and Jaguars. Plenty of teams can get there including the Lions, Steelers, Raiders, Bucs, Eagles, and possibly the Panthers. A team can restructure Watson’s contract for cap relief after the fact but would need the room, unless Houston picked up some of the cost, to execute the trade.

 

As it stands right now Watson’s contract has salaries of $35 million in 2022, $37 million in 2023, and $32 million in 2024 and 2025. Those would also be the salary cap charges associated with a team who trades for him. A simple restructure would allow Watson’s 2022 cap hit to be as low as $9.53 million following a trade. Watson’s 2022 and 2023 salaries are more or less guaranteed already, but a guarantee shouldn’t be of any concern for a team making this type of trade commitment as the expectation is to have a relationship well beyond the term of this contract.

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Shocker said:

It clearly is Seattle or us at this point.  Please let it be Seattle.  And technically Watson puts us over the cap so we can’t exactly afford him

you have to consider the players we are giving to the texans in the trade too. According to that article, we are in financial shape to make this happen. We still have about 4-5 options on the roster to restructure as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Its plausible, because if we are trading players in return on this deal and not just draft picks, that creates space as well. No telling who it will be, and there isnt mant options that would give us a shitload of money back, but with one or two more restructures and traded player(s

For the prices being suggested, the Texans would hopefully be willing to take Darnold.

Edited by Evil Hurney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

you have to consider the players we are giving to the texans in the trade too. According to that article, we are in financial shape to make this happen. We still have about 4-5 options on the roster to restructure as well

Agreed, just in a “be a dick” kinda mood.  😉

Edited by Shocker
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good, our ST is almost as bad as our ILB depth!
    • With two starters on expiring contracts (Moton + Corbett) as well as a few back-ups (Christensen, Mays, and Nijman), the Panthers are likely going to have to reinvest in the OL after this coming season. Icky's fifth-year option was picked up by the team this offseason while Lewis and Hunt both remain under contract then (though Lewis' deal is set-up in a way that would let Carolina move on from him then as well). I think that the team is going to be looking at investing a premium pick at RT should Bryce's development continue, and might even look to double dip at the position in order to have a swing tackle that can also kick inside when needed. There's also the question of starting center... Prospects I'm watching this upcoming college season... Centers Jake Slaughter (Florida) Iapani Laloulu (Oregon) Connor Lew (Auburn) Logan Jones (Iowa) Parker Brailsford (Alabama) Connor Tollison (Missouri) Bryce Foster (Kentucky) Pat Coogan Notre Dame) Raheem Anderson (Michigan) Carson Hinzman (Ohio State) RTs Francis Mauigoa (Miami) Kadyn Proctor (Alabama) Spencer Fano (Utah) Gennings Dunker (Iowa) Blake Miller (Clemson) Isaiah World (Oregon) Caleb Tiernan (Northwestern) Monroe Feeling (Georgia) Earnest Greene III (Georgia) Monroe Mills (Louisville) Charles Jagusah (Notre Dame) Tree Babalade (South Carolina) Trey Zuhn III (Texas A&M) Nolan Rucci (Penn State) Tristan Leigh (Clemson) Fernando Carmona (Arkansas) JC Davis (Illinois) Riley Mahlman (Wisconsin) PJ Williams (SMU) Tosh Baker (Notre Dame) Aki Ogunbiyi (Texas A&M) Courtland Ford (Kentucky) Ethan Onianwa (Rice)
    • I watched documentary on the 2010 Auburn season and Cam wasn’t included in that either. I think he just doesn’t care for these things
×
×
  • Create New...