Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper will let Watson name next head coach?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

I mean, if he does pick the Saints. You do realize most of us won't be happy, right? This team will be basement dwellers for years because the Saints will be the top of the Division regardless. While we're wasting draft pick after draft pick on QB's. Sigh. 

The Saint’s are currently over the cap by 6 million plus. So taking on a $45 million contract would cripple them more than anyone. I think people are overestimating the long term impact such a deal would have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, weyco2000 said:

The Saint’s are currently over the cap by 6 million plus. So taking on a $45 million contract would cripple them more than anyone. I think people are overestimating the long term impact such a deal would have. 

Yeah, but they would still have a top 5 QB. While we have Darnold, and possibly Malik Willis that would start next year at some point. We're just so much better (sarcasm). And everyone talking about cap room. 

They've been in cap "hell" for how long? And what's happened? Nothing. That thought is dumb at this point. Utterly stupid. 

Edited by NCTHFL0567
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, weyco2000 said:

The Saint’s are currently over the cap by 6 million plus. So taking on a $45 million contract would cripple them more than anyone. I think people are overestimating the long term impact such a deal would have. 

The saints haven't been out of cap hell since y2k. They'll be fine 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

The saints haven't been out of cap hell since y2k. They'll be fine 

Brees was much like Brady in regards to salary, willing to restructure and take less pay for the sake of winning. I don’t see that happening with Watson, so they’ll have to include some of their pricey talent to clear 50 plus million. But I hope they do…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

Yeah, but they would still have a top 5 QB. While we have Darnold, and possibly Malik Willis that would start next year at some point. We're just so much better (sarcasm). And everyone talking about cap room. 

They've been in cap "hell" for how long? And what's happened? Nothing. That thought is dumb at this point. Utterly stupid. 

Top 5 QB, now that’s stupid 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, weyco2000 said:

Won 4 games, all those stats are fuging garbage 

I see you haven't paid attention to his actual stats. I see you're completely one sided on this.

You probably think building through the draft is the best route, no?

Let me break this down for you, since you're older and still think that's the best route to winning a Championship.

The current SB winners have traded or signed. Their QB1, RB2, CB1, WR2, DE1, and OLB1. Sure. They drafted some capital. But none of them were as important as QB1. But I digress. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah we had multiple chances to tie up the game or take the lead. We have made some significant strides as a team shooting threes but this group absolutely needs to get more aggressive in the paint in crunch time if they want to be a playoff team. For all the praise of the group and Charles Lee being talked up as coach of the year that's just pitiful and unacceptable. Also adding even more insult to the loss. Apparently Embid is 21-1 against the Hornets.
    • I read that they don't like arms under 34", but I do not know.  I can say that I have followed OTs who were drafted and many get kicked inside.  Brady Christensen is one example. RTs seem to be more tolerant of shorter arms.  As much as it seems silly, there is a reason the short-armed prospects can't hack the outside.   For the 2026 NFL Draft, arm length is a critical talking point for offensive tackles, with 33 inches usually being the minimum threshold for teams. Notable top prospects include Monroe Freeling (34 3/4"), Blake Miller (34 1/4"), and Dametrious Crownover (35 3/8") having elite length, while Spencer Fano (32 1/8") is facing potential positional moves.  Top 2026 NFL Draft Tackle Arm Lengths (Combine Measurements) Monroe Freeling: 34 3/4" Blake Miller: 34 1/4" Dametrious Crownover: 35 3/8" Max Iheanachor: 33 7/8" Caleb Lomu: 33 3/8" Kadyn Proctor: 33 3/8" Francis Mauigoa: 33 1/4" Spencer Fano: 32 1/8" Markeel Bell: 36 3/8" Garrett DiGiorgio: 32 5/8" Trey Zuhn III: 32 1/2"  Key 2026 Measurements & Context The 33-inch Cutoff: Many teams consider 33 inches the minimum for NFL tackles, with sub-33 inch arms often leading to a move to guard. Spencer Fano's Case: Despite top-15 draft projections, Fano's 32 1/8" arms at the combine sparked debate about his long-term position, though he measured 32 7/8" at his pro day. High-Length Options: Markel Bell (36 3/8") is a standout for his length, while Dametrious Crownover (35 3/8") also boasts high-end measurements. Proctor's Perspective: Prospects like Kadyn Proctor acknowledge the talk but emphasize that elite film can overcome shorter measurements.  Olinemen I like late:  KY OT Farmer--has the arms but lacks the feet. will be a solid G imo. Parker II (Duke OT with sub 33 inch arms.  Smart with good feet--projects to center.  A smart, agile center is a nice thing. Zuhn III (Tex AM) is another T to C candidate. Of course, I think the Panthers will like traditional center Logan Jones (Iowa) because he is an experienced (50 starts) fit in a zone scheme.      
    • He's apparently told the school that he was interested, hence why they are waiting. 
×
×
  • Create New...