Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Howell, UNC pro day Monday


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

The reason I think this needs to be discussed is because Howell is a local product that was once considered a top QB prospect (after 2020) and is now looking like a second rounder--if you go by the media.  Some say that he is a poor Man's Baker Mayfield, others think that he is a sleeper who will become a starting NFL QB.  The reason this is significant:  If he is that sleeper pick, we could trade back and grab him.

However, there may not be a more important Pro Day to date for any player.  I personally think Howell will do very well and increase his stock value--creeping into the end of the first round (I think he could go anywhere from the Steelers at #20 to Detroit at #32 or #34.) Of course, a bad pro day could cause his stock to drop into the late second/early third round. 

Forget about which college you pull for--nobody gives a sh!t.  Base this on the player.  Don't focus solely on 2021 film--take a look at 2020 as well.  After his pro day, it will be interesting to see where you think he will go.  Could the Panthers take him if they trade back?  How much worse is Howell than Pickett?  Corral?  etc.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At one point many moons ago, I thought Howell was in the discussion at 6th. One weekend I dove in and he was the one player I truly soured on badly....I dont even have him in the top 6 QBs(of a class i hate) and the 6th QB I never researched....... Avoid til late 4th-5th at best. He needs to land at the perfect 3rd QB deal and pray. Plus dont spend any of the NFL bucks...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm down if we get him.  

 

in a trade back scenario.  Hes my QB4 as far as wish list

 

can I evaluate talent? no and neither can you couch GM that is reading this

 

 

 

I think theres a lot of QBs who would develop into a good player if they are aupported appropriatly.. you know.. good coaching/coordinators, good OL, weapons etc

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With high talent players around them, Howell and Corral are the two best QBs in this draft - playmakers who make the guys around them better and put them in position to succeed. With low-talent players, Willis is the best; he can make incredible plays out of nothing. Pickett is middle of the pack in either case, but he and Corral are the best at executing to a scheme. All 4 of these dudes are above average-to-good scramblers and they all have good enough arms to make the necessary throws to start in the NFL. None of them are sure things so let’s maximize value for the team and not reach on one at 6. 
 

Will definitely be interesting to see what Howell’s pro day does in terms of his media profile leading up to the draft. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we weren't a bunch of idiots that traded away all our picks, I'd consider him in the 3rd. We need an actual upgrade over PJ Walker at some point. 

But, we also have a weak enough roster that we can't easily afford a luxury like upgrading our backup QB. Especially when our starter is trash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Howell is getting overlooked. He still had a solid year missing his weapons, with his shitty OL. Scouts are just down on him because he wasn’t as good as the year before. We saw what he can do with a couple weapons and decent OL protection and it was projecting him to be the top pick this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I think he could be the sleeper of the draft.  I am not a big UNC fan (was born in Columbia while my Dad played for Gamecocks--hint) but in the right situation, Howell could be good.  Or he could stink it up in the wrong situation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, The Huddler said:

I'm down if we get him.  

 

in a trade back scenario.  Hes my QB4 as far as wish list

 

can I evaluate talent? no and neither can you couch GM that is reading this

 

 

 

I think theres a lot of QBs who would develop into a good player if they are aupported appropriatly.. you know.. good coaching/coordinators, good OL, weapons etc

He is my QB 4 as well.  I think he is better than Ridder.  I think the top 3 are Bs, and I think Howell is a B-/C+.  Ridder is a C. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This might not be related, but I am starting to think the public fussing over Pickett's hands was all for show, making everyone think we are targeting him.  Fitterer likes to trade back and needs to---so maybe they are targeting Howell.  Who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I watched Howell's pro day and I was impressed.  EJ Manual (Florida State around 2010-Buffalo Bills QB) seemed impressed with a lot of Howell's throws.  There was a meeting that caused head coaches to miss this pro day, so Howell is going to do another one.

The thing I like about Howell is his cool.  He does not get rattled.  He looked good under the simulated center---he can pass from the pocket, on the run, against his body, etc. and he is accurate with good velocity.  I was impressed with his footwork from under center. 

He does not have the quick release you see with Pickett or Corral, but he throws it 30 yards on a rope with no effort.  Looked like he flicked it 30 yards.

Comparisons:  The panel of ACC commentators compared Howell to Drew Brees, Russell Wilson, and Steve Young.  (I know).

Coach Mack Brown compared him to other players he has coached--and he came up with Colt McCoy.

I would rank the QBs this way:

1. Willis

2. Corral

3. Pickett

4. Howell

5. Ridder

I did not see a Panther rep in the crowd, but there was a conflict for coaches.  I can say that all 32 teams were present, but I saw multiple Steelers (pick 20) and Lions (pick 32) coaches standing behind him.  There was a comment about how Tomlin wanted to be there--

Frankly:  I cannot see much difference between my top 4 QBs (I have not seen Ridder yet).  If we like Howell, it could be a trade back to about 12-18 and grab Howell.

Measurables:  Hand--9 1/8,  height: 6 ft.  weight: 224

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...