Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How dangerous is Willis as a runner? What makes him special?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

10-6 and got them in the playoffs in his first full season.  Keep in mind he was out of the league from his dog fighting crimes for a couple years.  Imagine Vick with Reid throughout his career.  Now you are switching it up though.  You said he couldn't pass so I showed you how he could with the right coach, then you bring it to winning (10-6 isn't terrible), but I assume you mean playoffs wins?  So no he didn't get a playoff win immediately with Reid after being out of the league for several years.  I'm not sure how that proves he couldn't pass the ball?

Let me put it this way: Would you want to go into a season with Kevin Kolb, AJ Feeley or Koy Detmer as your quarterback?

Every one of those guys produced good stats and even won games in an Andy Reid system.

Is that evidence that they were good quarterbacks?

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Two things...

Yes, lots of quarterbacks are capable of occasionally running for a first down if something opens up. Considering them "dual threat" quarterbacks or even mobile quarterbacks strictly based on that criteria is a huge stretch. By that definition, you could put Jake Delhomme in one of those categories.

Second, and probably more important, you're arguing against a viewpoint that doesn't exist (at least not with me, but I can only speak for myself).

It's not that you have to be a pocket passer to win. It's that you have to be a capable passer to win, regardless of what you can or can't do as a runner.

The notion that you have to be able to run just isn't true, never has been. If you're capable of running, great. That adds value to your quarterback skill set.

But it's the best that you can do is run for an occasional first down when something breaks open, that's okay too.

Also to be clear, very little of what I've been talking about is any direct discussion of Malik Willis. I'm not a big Willis fan, but for most of the topic here I've been talking about general concepts more so than Willis himself.

But focusing on him directly, this is how I'd summarize it.

If he can develop into a solid passer, then yes he will succeed in the NFL.

If he can't, it doesn't matter if he's more athletic than Vick, Newton and Jackson combined. He's going to wash out as a quarterback.

There is really nothing more to be said about willis at this point past this post.  Everyone and their brother acknowledge he needs a ton of work on the passing side, mechanics, reading defenses etc.  And everyone acknowledges he is going to need a redshirt year (or 2).  So that alone crosses him off of our board.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Let me put it this way: Would you want to go into a season with Kevin Kolb, AJ Feeley or Koy Detmer as your quarterback?

Every one of those guys produced good stats and even won games in an Andy Reid system.

Is that evidence that they were good quarterbacks?

So I can go to the Super Bowl winners (you know the ones that aren't "running qbs") and ask you a similar question.  Would you rather have Nick Foles, Joe Flaco, or 38 year old Manning as your QB?  If you are just using playoff wins these guys won it all.  I'll raise you a Trent Dilfer and a Brad Johnson.  My point is TEAMS win in the playoffs.  Joe Burrow's defense shut down Mahomes for half a game, but guess who gets the credit for that win?  Stafford throws 2 INTs in the Super Bowl, but guess who gets the win?   Manning was under 60% completion with 9 TDs and 17 INTs with 2200 passing yards but he beat MVP Cam in the big game...  I believe Manning's rating was 8.6 for the Super Bowl.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

So I can go to the Super Bowl winners (you know the ones that aren't "running qbs") and ask you a similar question.  Would you rather have Nick Foles, Joe Flaco, or 38 year old Manning as your QB?  If you are just using playoff wins these guys won it all.  I'll raise you a Trent Dilfer and a Brad Johnson.  My point is TEAMS win in the playoffs.  Joe Burrow's defense shut down Mahomes for half a game, but guess who gets the credit for that win?  Stafford throws 2 INTs in the Super Bowl, but guess who gets the win?   Manning was under 60% completion with 9 TDs and 17 INTs with 2200 passing yards but he beat MVP Cam in the big game...  I believe Manning's rating was 8.6 for the Super Bowl.

Where have I ever said that winning and losing aren't team things?

But if that's the route that you want to go, then answer this:

Can we win with Sam Darnold?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

There is really nothing more to be said about willis at this point past this post.  Everyone and their brother acknowledge he needs a ton of work on the passing side, mechanics, reading defenses etc.  And everyone acknowledges he is going to need a redshirt year (or 2).  So that alone crosses him off of our board.

Not everyone

Screenshot_20220406-111704_Plume.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

There is really nothing more to be said about willis at this point past this post.  Everyone and their brother acknowledge he needs a ton of work on the passing side, mechanics, reading defenses etc.  And everyone acknowledges he is going to need a redshirt year (or 2).  So that alone crosses him off of our board.

I agree.  This alone should remove him from our board.  If we are going to draft a QB it is going to be someone who can beat out Darnold.  Willis isn't it. 

If I am going to gamble on a QB with #6 I'd rather have Pickett or Howell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

There is really nothing more to be said about willis at this point past this post.  Everyone and their brother acknowledge he needs a ton of work on the passing side, mechanics, reading defenses etc.  And everyone acknowledges he is going to need a redshirt year (or 2).  So that alone crosses him off of our board.

Matter of fact PFF just mocked him to us a hour or so ago

Screenshot_20220411-173746_Plume.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I agree.  This alone should remove him from our board.  If we are going to draft a QB it is going to be someone who can beat out Darnold.  Willis isn't it. 

If I am going to gamble on a QB with #6 I'd rather have Pickett or Howell. 

You would be wrong for spending the number 6 pick on a limited upside Pickett and Howell who is projected second rounder. I like Howell but nobody has him going in the top 20 maybe not the first round. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

So I can go to the Super Bowl winners (you know the ones that aren't "running qbs") and ask you a similar question.  Would you rather have Nick Foles, Joe Flaco, or 38 year old Manning as your QB?  If you are just using playoff wins these guys won it all.  I'll raise you a Trent Dilfer and a Brad Johnson.  My point is TEAMS win in the playoffs.  Joe Burrow's defense shut down Mahomes for half a game, but guess who gets the credit for that win?  Stafford throws 2 INTs in the Super Bowl, but guess who gets the win?   Manning was under 60% completion with 9 TDs and 17 INTs with 2200 passing yards but he beat MVP Cam in the big game...  I believe Manning's rating was 8.6 for the Super Bowl.

This should kill that whole argument. The whole idea that the quarterback wins and decides playoff victories is ridiculous. There are 21 other guys who have a large say so and looking at the score at the end of the game doesn't mean the better qb won the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...