Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper is full of it regarding Darnold


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hopefully this works for you 2 since you are clearly not getting this...

Example..

If we are trying to get a Jimmy G or Baker..

The best way to keep our leverage and not give up assets..

Is     for  them  to believe we still have faith in Sam..

It's not that hard to understand..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Comparing trade leverage and managing the media to lying to customers about an employee is like comparing magnets to seaweed. There is nothing there to compare.

Sam Darnold has been the worst QB in the league for four years.

We have said THIS week we will be adding another QB and Sam darnold isn't guaranteed to start here.

We have said we won't make a QB trade until after the draft.

In what world of idiots on the internet does Tepper calling Sam Darnold a good QB going to change the opinions of any HC,OC, or GM? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Wasn't this before they had even fired Adam Gase? He said he's their best QB on the roster that's it. Sam has had back to back seasons as the worst starting QB in the NFL. There is data that shows there's really no other QB that has been as bad as he was in that timespan within the last ten years. There is no reason to speak positively other than to say he is currently the best QB on the roster because only he and PJ Walker are currently under contract. There is not an NFL team out there team stupid enough as we were to buy this foolishness. There is no purpose to say these things other than to further embarrass ourselves. If we can't trade him cut his ass loose we are NOT fooling anyone with this nonsense.

Dude stop..

Reality is they were praising Sam, taking all the blame for Sam faults and even talking about keeping Sam and Wilson on the roster all the way until they traded him..

This is what happened..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Hopefully this works for you 2 since you are clearly not getting this...

Example..

If we are trying to get a Jimmy G or Baker..

The best way to keep our leverage and not give up assets..

Is     for  them  to believe we still have faith in Sam..

It's not that hard to understand..

Just like everyone knows the 49ers and the Browns are moving on from Jimmy G and Baker everyone knows we are moving on from Sam.

Any team desperate for a QB would always take Baker (same cap hit/salary) over Sam or Jimmy G (He's going to cost even less).

What team is looking to add Sam Darnold to their Roster right now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Call Me James said:

Sam Darnold has been the worst QB in the league for four years.

We have said THIS week we will be adding another QB and Sam darnold isn't guaranteed to start here.

We have said we won't make a QB trade until after the draft.

In what world of idiots on the internet does Tepper calling Sam Darnold a good QB going to change the opinions of any HC,OC, or GM? 

He isn’t changing the minds of Gms about Darnold, he is not sharing our hand for what we do at 6. I dont I know how you don’t see this.

Feel free to be worked up about it. I know I’m not gonna lose any sleep over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Call Me James said:

Sam Darnold has been the worst QB in the league for four years.

We have said THIS week we will be adding another QB and Sam darnold isn't guaranteed to start here.

We have said we won't make a QB trade until after the draft.

In what world of idiots on the internet does Tepper calling Sam Darnold a good QB going to change the opinions of any HC,OC, or GM? 

This is an amazingly shallow viewpoint.  So Tepper should come into this interview and say Sam Darnold totally sucks.  That is so damn stupid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

He isn’t changing the minds of Gms about Darnold, he is not sharing our hand for what we do at 6. I dont I know how you don’t see this.

Feel free to be worked up about it. I know I’m not gonna lose any sleep over it.

I'm worked up by the idiocy on display by you and wow. 

Tepper should have just said, I'll let the football guys answer this. Or we would obviously like to see more from Sam. Or I'd love to see the Sam from weeks 1-3 for an entire season. Or hopefully our off season moves help to improve our QB play. Or we're trying to win. Sam's on our roster and he wants to win too.

 

Anything, almost anything is better than, " Sam's a very good QB." Especially at a time where the fans don't think you have a clue about running a football team. If there was ever a time to read the room...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WOW!! said:

Ppl get upset about the wrong poo..

What was he supposed to say about a player he is still financially committe to and don't  have a viable replacement on the roster for??

My stance has been that nothing Tepper could say would appease people.

“Our QB sucks and the head coach is a disaster.  If he doesn’t win  at least 8 games I’m changing the locks at BOA.” This is what folks want him to say but probably not the best approach.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Call Me James said:

I'm worked up by the idiocy on display by you and wow. 

 

Then you should take a break from the internet or just get used to the fact that in life people are going to disagree with you, and you have to learn that not everyone has the same opinion as you.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

Then you should take a break from the internet or just get used to the fact that in life people are going to disagree with you, and you have to learn that not everyone has the same opinion as you.

You quoted me. Now you're trying to convince yourselves why such a stupid comment is 4d chess.Cabin Fever Reaction GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...