Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don't Forget Cornbread


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

Not sure how he or BC fit into the equation now, but we've discussed BC quite a bit this offseason...  I, and many, project BC will kick into LG as the starter now with the addition of Ickey.  And I know we also just drafted Mays, and have Corbett starting on the right, but it seems Brown has gotten lost or forgotten in the shuffle.  I think a lot of where he falls is dependent on whether Campen thinks he's a mean enough SOB, but I was impressed in what little we saw of him last season.  So, at the very least, even if he ends up latching on as a backup with a year of experience and development under his belt, our weakest position group for years may have just flipped to one of the NFL's best units in one offseason.  It'll be interesting to see what his role ends up being this coming season with all of the moves we have made...  I think it's possible he could push BC for snaps at LG too.

Great job, Fitt.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think it depends on if Brady can play LG, up to this point it hasn’t been a great experiment as he performed better at LT. Worst case scenario is Ickey gets kicked inside for a year and mauls the poo out of people while they see if Brady can be a good LT.

If Brady doesn’t pan out then of course you have Ickey ready at LT and Deonte Brown and Cade Mays ready to fight for for that LG position.

If neither one of them fixes the problem then you address the guard position in next years draft with a second round pick or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I really think it depends on if Brady can play LG, up to this point it hasn’t been a great experiment as he performed better at LT. Worst case scenario is Ickey gets kicked inside for a year and mauls the poo out of people while they see if Brady can be a good LT.

If Brady doesn’t pan out then of course you have Ickey ready at LT and Deonte Brown and Cade Mays ready to fight for for that LG position.

If neither one of them fixes the problem then you address the guard position in next years draft with a second round pick or so.

No, Ickey was the 6th pick in the draft, you don't take an OL with the 6th pick and play him at Guard while starting your 3rd rounder the previous year at LT just because you're not sure if the 3rd rounder is good enough to play Guard.

You play the stud at LT and if the 3rd rounder can't cut it at Guard, you put someone else in there.

Easy decision here unless Ickey comes in and just looks horrible at LT, which seems rather unlikely to happen.

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

No, Ickey was the 6th pick in the draft, you don't take an OL with the 6th pick and play him at Guard while starting your 3rd rounder the previous year at LT just because you're not sure if the 3rd rounder is good enough to play Guard.

You play the stud at LT and if the 3rd rounder can't cut it at Guard, you put someone else in there.

Easy decision here unless Ickey comes in and just looks horrible at LT, which seems rather unlikely to happen.

You do if it puts the best five players out on the field.

You don’t play Ickey at LT and then play Erving next to him because at that point you’ve negated Ickey’s impact because he’s covering for Erving.

Best five guys play and if Ickey has to slide inside for 1 YEAR then so be it.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

You do if it puts the best five players out on the field.

You don’t play Ickey at LT and then play Erving next to him because at that point you’ve negated Ickey’s impact because he’s covering for Erving.

Best five guys play and if Ickey has to slide inside for 1 YEAR then so be it.

Ickey might already be our best OL, and we've started 16 players at LT in the last 8 seasons since Gross retired.  Unless he significantly struggles at LT in camp and just can't be trusted out there, he's our starting LT week 1 without question.  

if Brady can't play at LG next to someone like Ickey, then he's not going to succeed at LT either.  And if he does succeed at LT, you say Ickey is only meant to play Guard for 1 year, then what happens next year?

Do you then swap them?  and if so, then what was the point in playing Brady at LT this year?

Ickey is our starting LT, Brady is option A at LG, but if he can't cut it, you do anything other than move Ickey inside unless he's also struggling at LT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Ickey might already be our best OL, and we've started 16 players at LT in the last 8 seasons since Gross retired.  Unless he significantly struggles at LT in camp and just can't be trusted out there, he's our starting LT week 1 without question.  

if Brady can't play at LG next to someone like Ickey, then he's not going to succeed at LT either.  And if he does succeed at LT, you say Ickey is only meant to play Guard for 1 year, then what happens next year?

Do you then swap them?  and if so, then what was the point in playing Brady at LT this year?

Ickey is our starting LT, Brady is option A at LG, but if he can't cut it, you do anything other than move Ickey inside unless he's also struggling at LT.

I think we are getting ahead of ourself if we think Ickey is going to be better than Moton on day one.

And the point is you nor I don’t know what we have in Brady.

It goes back to the fact that the players already on the roster deserve a chance to prove their worth.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I really think it depends on if Brady can play LG, up to this point it hasn’t been a great experiment as he performed better at LT. Worst case scenario is Ickey gets kicked inside for a year and mauls the poo out of people while they see if Brady can be a good LT.

If Brady doesn’t pan out then of course you have Ickey ready at LT and Deonte Brown and Cade Mays ready to fight for for that LG position.

If neither one of them fixes the problem then you address the guard position in next years draft with a second round pick or so.

Offensively, I think BC at LT and Icky inside would be a pretty nasty left side.  

However, if they move BC inside and Icky at LT I think Campen will get BC up to speed and make him a  good guard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Offensively, I think BC at LT and Icky inside would be a pretty nasty left side.  

However, if they move BC inside and Icky at LT I think Campen will get BC up to speed and make him a  good guard. 

I just can't think of any reason that starting our 2022 1st rounder and 6th overall pick at LG and starting our 2021 3rd round pick at LT makes any sense at all.

Now if Brady played all year at LT last year and was good, it's a different story, and in that scenario, we probably don't even take Ickey.  But that's not at all the scenario, even if Brady is better at LT than LG, you don't draft an OL at #6 and start him at Guard over a Tackle/Guard combo taken in the 3rd round the previous year and had minimal game action as a rookie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Offensively, I think BC at LT and Icky inside would be a pretty nasty left side.  

However, if they move BC inside and Icky at LT I think Campen will get BC up to speed and make him a  good guard. 

That’s what I’m hoping for but if for some reason BC simply continues to struggle at LG I’d much rather have the best five on the field then see Erving out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

That’s what I’m hoping for but if for some reason BC simply continues to struggle at LG I’d much rather have the best five on the field then see Erving out there.

At DB, DL, LB, sure, you play someone out of position if it means getting the best players on the field for that position, even if it means one player not at their ideal position.

But LT is the second most important position on the team after QB, I don't care how much the LG struggles, you don't move a franchise LT inside to Guard, period.  

If Brady was that much better of an LT than LG, then he'd have been playing out there before the final couple weeks of the season last year.  Short of Ickey being a complete turnstile at LT, there is absolutely no scenario I can think of to where he plays any position other than LT.

There is a reason you'll see undrafted players come in and start at Guard as rookies and can quickly become pro bowlers.  You don't see undrafted players do that at LT, it just doesn't happen, there is a reason for it.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...