Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don't Forget Cornbread


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Not sure how he or BC fit into the equation now, but we've discussed BC quite a bit this offseason...  I, and many, project BC will kick into LG as the starter now with the addition of Ickey.  And I know we also just drafted Mays, and have Corbett starting on the right, but it seems Brown has gotten lost or forgotten in the shuffle.  I think a lot of where he falls is dependent on whether Campen thinks he's a mean enough SOB, but I was impressed in what little we saw of him last season.  So, at the very least, even if he ends up latching on as a backup with a year of experience and development under his belt, our weakest position group for years may have just flipped to one of the NFL's best units in one offseason.  It'll be interesting to see what his role ends up being this coming season with all of the moves we have made...  I think it's possible he could push BC for snaps at LG too.

Great job, Fitt.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think it depends on if Brady can play LG, up to this point it hasn’t been a great experiment as he performed better at LT. Worst case scenario is Ickey gets kicked inside for a year and mauls the poo out of people while they see if Brady can be a good LT.

If Brady doesn’t pan out then of course you have Ickey ready at LT and Deonte Brown and Cade Mays ready to fight for for that LG position.

If neither one of them fixes the problem then you address the guard position in next years draft with a second round pick or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I really think it depends on if Brady can play LG, up to this point it hasn’t been a great experiment as he performed better at LT. Worst case scenario is Ickey gets kicked inside for a year and mauls the poo out of people while they see if Brady can be a good LT.

If Brady doesn’t pan out then of course you have Ickey ready at LT and Deonte Brown and Cade Mays ready to fight for for that LG position.

If neither one of them fixes the problem then you address the guard position in next years draft with a second round pick or so.

No, Ickey was the 6th pick in the draft, you don't take an OL with the 6th pick and play him at Guard while starting your 3rd rounder the previous year at LT just because you're not sure if the 3rd rounder is good enough to play Guard.

You play the stud at LT and if the 3rd rounder can't cut it at Guard, you put someone else in there.

Easy decision here unless Ickey comes in and just looks horrible at LT, which seems rather unlikely to happen.

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

No, Ickey was the 6th pick in the draft, you don't take an OL with the 6th pick and play him at Guard while starting your 3rd rounder the previous year at LT just because you're not sure if the 3rd rounder is good enough to play Guard.

You play the stud at LT and if the 3rd rounder can't cut it at Guard, you put someone else in there.

Easy decision here unless Ickey comes in and just looks horrible at LT, which seems rather unlikely to happen.

You do if it puts the best five players out on the field.

You don’t play Ickey at LT and then play Erving next to him because at that point you’ve negated Ickey’s impact because he’s covering for Erving.

Best five guys play and if Ickey has to slide inside for 1 YEAR then so be it.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

You do if it puts the best five players out on the field.

You don’t play Ickey at LT and then play Erving next to him because at that point you’ve negated Ickey’s impact because he’s covering for Erving.

Best five guys play and if Ickey has to slide inside for 1 YEAR then so be it.

Ickey might already be our best OL, and we've started 16 players at LT in the last 8 seasons since Gross retired.  Unless he significantly struggles at LT in camp and just can't be trusted out there, he's our starting LT week 1 without question.  

if Brady can't play at LG next to someone like Ickey, then he's not going to succeed at LT either.  And if he does succeed at LT, you say Ickey is only meant to play Guard for 1 year, then what happens next year?

Do you then swap them?  and if so, then what was the point in playing Brady at LT this year?

Ickey is our starting LT, Brady is option A at LG, but if he can't cut it, you do anything other than move Ickey inside unless he's also struggling at LT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Ickey might already be our best OL, and we've started 16 players at LT in the last 8 seasons since Gross retired.  Unless he significantly struggles at LT in camp and just can't be trusted out there, he's our starting LT week 1 without question.  

if Brady can't play at LG next to someone like Ickey, then he's not going to succeed at LT either.  And if he does succeed at LT, you say Ickey is only meant to play Guard for 1 year, then what happens next year?

Do you then swap them?  and if so, then what was the point in playing Brady at LT this year?

Ickey is our starting LT, Brady is option A at LG, but if he can't cut it, you do anything other than move Ickey inside unless he's also struggling at LT.

I think we are getting ahead of ourself if we think Ickey is going to be better than Moton on day one.

And the point is you nor I don’t know what we have in Brady.

It goes back to the fact that the players already on the roster deserve a chance to prove their worth.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I really think it depends on if Brady can play LG, up to this point it hasn’t been a great experiment as he performed better at LT. Worst case scenario is Ickey gets kicked inside for a year and mauls the poo out of people while they see if Brady can be a good LT.

If Brady doesn’t pan out then of course you have Ickey ready at LT and Deonte Brown and Cade Mays ready to fight for for that LG position.

If neither one of them fixes the problem then you address the guard position in next years draft with a second round pick or so.

Offensively, I think BC at LT and Icky inside would be a pretty nasty left side.  

However, if they move BC inside and Icky at LT I think Campen will get BC up to speed and make him a  good guard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Offensively, I think BC at LT and Icky inside would be a pretty nasty left side.  

However, if they move BC inside and Icky at LT I think Campen will get BC up to speed and make him a  good guard. 

I just can't think of any reason that starting our 2022 1st rounder and 6th overall pick at LG and starting our 2021 3rd round pick at LT makes any sense at all.

Now if Brady played all year at LT last year and was good, it's a different story, and in that scenario, we probably don't even take Ickey.  But that's not at all the scenario, even if Brady is better at LT than LG, you don't draft an OL at #6 and start him at Guard over a Tackle/Guard combo taken in the 3rd round the previous year and had minimal game action as a rookie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Offensively, I think BC at LT and Icky inside would be a pretty nasty left side.  

However, if they move BC inside and Icky at LT I think Campen will get BC up to speed and make him a  good guard. 

That’s what I’m hoping for but if for some reason BC simply continues to struggle at LG I’d much rather have the best five on the field then see Erving out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

That’s what I’m hoping for but if for some reason BC simply continues to struggle at LG I’d much rather have the best five on the field then see Erving out there.

At DB, DL, LB, sure, you play someone out of position if it means getting the best players on the field for that position, even if it means one player not at their ideal position.

But LT is the second most important position on the team after QB, I don't care how much the LG struggles, you don't move a franchise LT inside to Guard, period.  

If Brady was that much better of an LT than LG, then he'd have been playing out there before the final couple weeks of the season last year.  Short of Ickey being a complete turnstile at LT, there is absolutely no scenario I can think of to where he plays any position other than LT.

There is a reason you'll see undrafted players come in and start at Guard as rookies and can quickly become pro bowlers.  You don't see undrafted players do that at LT, it just doesn't happen, there is a reason for it.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's funny how the teams with the great QBs stay at or near the top of the league every season.  Yes it is a team game, but the QB has the biggest impact in most NFL football games. 
    • Look, no one is ever a perfect player.  Since the QB handles the ball on 100% of plays offensively (unless there's a direct snap to a RB or something), I can absolutely see where they get an outsized blame and gain from what happens at any given snap of a football game.   Theoretically, there shouldn't even be a stat or idea to a 4th quarter comeback or game winning drive because you should already have done that during the game.  Losers!  Right?  Just because you win late doesn't take away the fact you tried to lose the game for your team! I'm not a fan of that opinion, but again, I'm just a moron with a keyboard.   Bryce has limited tools.  Bryce has not inspired the same level of confidence in us as Cam Newton did in year 3.  I certainly get that.  We traded a TON of assets to get Bryce, and we still suck.  (I mean, since we've lost games, we're losers right?) I completely understand that some fans are just unhappy with a limited QB and a team that isn't performing well, unless the other teams are worse losers than we are. I will say this:  Bryce will fight until the end.  Sure, he's has some real loser football.   But in close games, he's doing his best to comeback (even against a winner of prevent D). Now is it better or worse if your QB plays their best ball in the first half and sucks 2nd half so long as they finish with 300 yards, 3 TDs for your fantasy points? Who said stats are for winners anyway?  The Panthers and Bryce has a long way to go.  I'm enjoying the winning right now.  Though I do start each game thinking "how will we fug this up today?" Because it's been such a poo show in the Tepper era.  Will he prove to be a legit starting NFL QB?  Maybe not here as evidence by our record with QBs who were high draft picks.  
    • Ive never liked the term game winning drives because they include games where the QB was part of or was the reason the team was behind in the first place. Ive been arguing against this stat since the Delhomme years. It should only count when the QB is out of the equation of reasons why the team fell behind in the first place and is at least half the reason why he led the last drive to give them a lead. It shouldnt count if they just hand it off most of the time and the RB is on fire and they go down and score a TD or FG.
×
×
  • Create New...