Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Corral is here because of Ben McAdoo


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Nahh.  They didn't practice it because Brady didn't know how to.

Sure he did.  He spent a couple years with Teddy in New Orleans.  Payton does it. 

Micromanger Matt Rhule is the HC.  He dictates the practice schedule.  Well, unless he is with another NFL team in a joint practice and Rhule cedes all control to them....because they know what they are doing and he doesn't.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

Sure he did.  He spent a couple years with Teddy in New Orleans.  Payton does it.

Uh huh.  Being part of organization that does something and being able to organize that same function are two different things.  But I can see where a Joe Brady lover couldn't see the difference.

You just can not let Joe Brady go. 

joe-brady-photo.png?w=1200%26h=0%26zc=1%

Sorry for your loss.  It will be ok.  It really will.  He'll be ok.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by poundaway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Nahh.  They didn't practice it because Brady didn't know how to.

Matt Rhule knows Teddy was right about Rhule not running real NFL practices. 

And it is in part is why Rhule let opposing coaches come into Charlotte and completely run our joint practices.  In our house.  Also allowed them to dicatate what he would and wouldn't do in the preseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

Matt Rhule knows Teddy was right about Rhule not running real NFL practices. 

And it is in part is why Rhule let opposing coaches come into Charlotte and completely run our joint practices.  In our house.  Also allowed them to dicatate what he would and wouldn't do in the preseason. 

I'm confused.  I thought he micromanaged everything.  Which is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, rayzor said:

. it takes a lot more than a fishing trip with a retired coach to learn how to do the job at this level.

The retired coach was a college coach that went 1-15 then 7-9 his first two NFL seasons, so maybe not the best example, but I get your point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, poundaway said:

I'm confused.  I thought he micromanaged everything.  Which is it?

He does in his world.  And it's well reported that has long been his approach.

The Ravens aren't part of Matt Rhule's staff.    

and there is nothing wrong w/ a green NFL HC wanting to watch people that have been doing it along time and take it in. 

But the type staff Matt Rhule has today is the one he should of had day 1.  That's on Tepper/Rhule for it not being that.  So was the fact they weren't practicing and gameplanning like real NFL teams.  That's also on Rhule/Tepper. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

But the type staff Matt Rhule has today is the one he should of had day 1.  That's on Tepper/Rhule for it not being that. 

 

 

Yes he should have had this staff day one.  He fncked up, and corrected it.  Brady was part of the fnckup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Yes he should have had this staff day one.  He fncked up, and corrected it.  Brady was part of the fnckup. 

AND....the fact the Carolina Panthers weren't having real NFL practices is on? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

AND....the fact the Carolina Panthers weren't having real NFL practices is on? 

 

We were having fake NFL practices?  Well there's the problem.  Someone should tell Rhule to stop doing the fake ones.  When you take him for the beer you were talking about, be sure to bring it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, poundaway said:

We were having fake NFL practices?  Well there's the problem.  Someone should tell Rhule to stop doing the fake ones.  When you take him for the beer you were talking about, be sure to bring it up.

I know this hard for you....

The fact the Carolina Panthers weren't devoting any time to the 2 minute drill, redzone, etc is on who? 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

I know this hard for you....

The fact the Carolina Panthers weren't devoting any time to the 2 minute drill, redzone, etc is on who? 

In the end dude, its all on Rhule....and there is a LOT of screw-ups that are on Rhule.

Which is why when he makes the right decision, like firing Joe Brady, I defend the decision. 
You bitch about him being a college coach lacking NFL experience, but when he fires the GREENEST of the college coaches on  the staff, you write post after post after post about poor Joe Brady.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, poundaway said:

In the end dude, its all on Rhule....and there is a LOT of screw-ups that are on Rhule.

Which is why when he makes the right decision, like firing Joe Brady, I defend the decision. 
You bitch about him being a college coach lacking NFL experience, but when he fires the GREENEST of the college coaches on  the staff, you write post after post after post about poor Joe Brady.

Matt Rhule is the correct answer.   

and again, I got no problem with him firing Joe Brady.  He shouldn't of hired him to start with.  It was a PR move for hype.   It was never going to work.  Fire him.  I don't care. 

I simply have a problem with using Brady as a scapegoat for all the problems.   He had his.  Fine with him owning his share.   But when people start claiming he was making all the roster decisions, Sam is here because of Joe Brady lol, Joe Brady set and controlled the practice schedule for the team, etc?  That's all belongs to Matt Rhule.  Not Brady. 

 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

and again, I got no problem with him firing Joe Brady.  He shouldn't of hired him to start with.  It was a PR move for hype.   It was never going to work.  Fire him.  I don't care. 

 

You have NO problem firing Brady?  After all that?  Seriously?

giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47jwt9eq3sfyufgd05ny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...