Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Matt Rhule develop players?


poundaway
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Cam's New Arm said:

First of all, friendo, please don't make someone work so hard to reply to you. Quote people, please. Don't @ them. I have no idea what I said an hour ago, let alone however long ago you were.

Secondly, what did I say? lol

Chevy Chase Ellie GIF

it's not what you said.   It's what you did.   Giving me a poo for what?  For saying that Rhule gives out Migraines?

Is he a relative of yours?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CRA said:

Yeah, as I said before the hire I ideally want an offensive HC and one that can basically take over if it isn’t up to par.   Ron was close to a being the polar opposite and did it on the defensive side.  

Rhule’s coaching career leading up to HC was basically to dabble in everything.  Jack of all trades, master of none.  Which in theory I guess is a good one to build a great resume to oversee a team. 

Some of the best coaches have coached both sides but specialize in one. I mean it goes beyond that and being a successful NFL head coach is insanely hard and really depends on your evaluation of coaches around you. Rhule hasn't imo been great at that either. He believes his system is superior and I'm not convinced. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Waldo said:

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2021/opp.htm

Says 21 for 2021. I get your point but we were not a top 10 D by the end of the year. 

Snow is a solid DC for sure. A little DB crazed but solid unit. Plus add in the failed 2019 D switch that basically left our D to be rebuilt from ashes in 2020. 

We were second in total yards allowed, yes, even at the end of the year and without Horn.  It isn't the perfect measurement, but it is an important one.  Field position matters.   The defense was on the field substantially more than the O because the O would have a 3 and out, int or fumble, and still we were second in yards allowed.  We were 4th in 1st downs allowed.    Yes, total points is the only measure that matters but it doesn't tell the full story.  None of them do.

Say what you want, but when you look at the TOTAL DISASTER RR and Hurney left behind, it is a radical improvement to the year before where we were nearly 4 games without forcing a punt and were in the bottom half or 3rd in most categories.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, poundaway said:

We were second in total yards allowed, yes, even at the end of the year and without Horn.  It isn't the perfect measurement, but it is an important one.  Field position matters.   The defense was on the field substantially more than the O because the O would have a 3 and out, int or fumble, and still we were second in yards allowed.  We were 4th in 1st downs allowed.    Yes, total points is the only measure that matters but it doesn't tell the full story.  None of them do.

Say what you want, but when you look at the TOTAL DISASTER RR and Hurney left behind, it is a radical improvement to the year before where we were nearly 4 games without forcing a punt and were in the bottom half or 3rd in most categories.

 

We were the top team in points allowed in the bottom 1/3 of the NFL or last team in the 2/3 of the NFL. We also gave up terrible field position. The top 10 D does not stand, that is fair given what we both said. It could be  soon but the entire point of a defense is to stop the other team from scoring, not to allow less yards at the end of the day even if the stat really does matter in the total evaluation. There are some big positives on the D but saying it was a top 10 D is very misleading. That is fair not BS or hope or hype. 

Nothing I said is an wrong or even really negative unless that naritive this was a top 10 D really matters to you for some reason. Some good, some bad and we saw some improvements and some not improvements (Chinn at FS comes to mind). We are used to having good to great Ds and 2021 wasn't comparable to our top D even with the upside it showed throughout the year.

Lol Hurney helped build an all D draft that is a huge chunk of this D by the way...and I despise Hurney. So my point stands and you are trying to deflect to Hurney about how this crew did last year after drafting D in the 1st and a new GM...So still not Hurney's fault in 2021 and still not a top 10 D unless you are talking in yards allowed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Waldo said:

We were the top team in points allowed in the bottom 1/3 of the NFL or last team in the 2/3 of the NFL. We also gave up terrible field position. The top 10 D does not stand, that is fair given what we both said. It could be  soon but the entire point of a defense is to stop the other team from scoring, not to allow less yards at the end of the day even if the stat really does matter in the total evaluation. There are some big positives on the D but saying it was a top 10 D is very misleading. That is fair not BS or hope or hype. 

Nothing I said is an wrong or even really negative unless that naritive this was a top 10 D really matters to you for some reason. Some good, some bad and we saw some improvements and some not improvements (Chinn at FS comes to mind). We are used to having good to great Ds and 2021 wasn't comparable to our top D even with the upside it showed throughout the year.

Lol Hurney helped build an all D draft that is a huge chunk of this D by the way...and I despise Hurney. So my point stands and you are trying to deflect to Hurney about how this crew did last year after drafting D in the 1st and a new GM...So still not Hurney's fault in 2021 and still not a top 10 D unless you are talking in yards allowed. 

I didn't say you were wrong, I was just filling in the picture.  I'm sure you weren't trying to create the impression that our defense was mediocre.   We weren't just top ten in yards,  we were 2nd in yards allowed, we were 3rd in yards allowed  per play, we were 4th in first downs allowed, we were 4th in passes allowed, 4th in passing yards allowed, and  2nd in passing first downs allowed.  Even in rushing, we were 8th in yards allowed per attempt.  We weren't just top ten in several categories, were top 5, not just yards.   

Hurney did draft a lot of the D.   Hurney also created a situation where we had to fill the D with rookies in 2020.    Rhule drove off Hurney, maybe his only long term contribution to the Panthers. 

That D improved dramatically in 2021 and in many defensive measurements, it wasn't top ten, it was top 5.

If we didn't have  Darnold, an injured CMC , dropsies Chubba/Anderson, a horrible OL made worse by injuries, and Joe "I can't tie my shoes without mouthing about the bunny" Brady, the D wouldn't have had one of the worst average starting field positions in the league and spend the entire game on the field.... and then the D would have been top ten in points as well.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, poundaway said:

I didn't say you were wrong, I was just filling in the picture.  I'm sure you weren't trying to create the impression that our defense was mediocre.   We weren't just top ten in yards,  we were 2nd in yards allowed, we were 3rd in yards allowed  per play, we were 4th in first downs allowed, we were 4th in passes allowed, 4th in passing yards allowed, and  2nd in passing first downs allowed.  Even in rushing, we were 8th in yards allowed per attempt.  We weren't just top ten in several categories, were top 5, not just yards.   

Hurney did draft a lot of the D.   Hurney also created a situation where we had to fill the D with rookies in 2020.    Rhule drove off Hurney, maybe his only long term contribution to the Panthers. 

That D improved dramatically in 2021 and in many defensive measurements, it wasn't top ten, it was top 5.

If we didn't have  Darnold, an injured CMC , dropsies Chubba/Anderson, a horrible OL made worse by injuries, and Joe "I can't tie my shoes without mouthing about the bunny" Brady, the D wouldn't have had one of the worst average starting field positions in the league and spend the entire game on the field.... and then the D would have been top ten in points as well.
 

It was an overall average D with some upside. It also carried the O but that also is a big factor in the yards allowed, we allowed 200 more yards overall on the D than O had. We gave up 21 ints and only had 9 on D. 

I thought the entire idea was to get young and build the culture and foundation? Now it's forced to be young? Hurney did not trade for Sam lol. Yeah, I get we don't agree but your angles I just can't support or really understand on some levels. CMC was a big question mark last year, lots expeced him to get reinjured if we didn't stop Cam'ing him...we didn't and all signs point to it happening again (Rhule's own statment). 

Rhule has been much worse than Brady, Brady was just inexperienced. Rhule is Rhule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Waldo said:

It was an overall average D with some upside.

If that makes you feel better.

Quote

Rhule has been much worse than Brady, Brady was just inexperienced. Rhule is Rhule. 

Not sure how you make that comparison, but whatever. 

My guess, Brady was just lucky to land at LSU with 3 HOFers and he'll never amount to anything.  He hasn't so far. 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/3/2022 at 8:43 PM, poundaway said:

I think Macadoo has.  I think Campen has. 

That’s completely new hires for us. I meant when you look at Rhules hires for his college career and now in the pros I haven’t seen much offensive development out of him or his staff. Their defenses have always been way ahead of their offenses. We shall see how this year plays out but I’m just going off of his last like 9 years. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most Huddlers have contacted me via Twitter, Zoom conference, PM, email, and in one case, a telegram delivered by the Pony Express (Mr. Scot) and asked me, "MHS, what are we going to do about the OL?  We already have the highest payroll and we are about to either pay Ekwonu for a fifth year or a lucrative, long-term contract.  Is this sustainable?"  "Nope." So I done some thinking, I did. I looked at contracts (OTC) and performance (PFF--the best available rating system, albeit flawed--let's move on) and age of the players.   A source called "AI" (yes, TheSpecialJuan, the same people who make the steak sauce) says this: Peak performance by position   Tackles: Peak performance can last longer for tackles, with top-tier players often peaking around age 34.   Centers and Guards: Peak performance for centers and guards generally occurs earlier, with peak years often ending between 29 and 32 years old.  So with that in mind, I offer you something called "Research" (literally, it means "to look for it again.") Enjoy GUARD Robert Hunt.  He is 29 right now and under contract for another 3 seasons. However, paying a G in his 30s $24m per season is crazy.  Something has to give.  We get no cap help by cutting him after this season unless he is a Post June 1 cut, then we throw $15m on the dead cap and save $9m.  Not worth it.  However, after the 2026 season, the post-June 1 savings go up to $19m. It is $13m if he is cut pre-June 1.  Hunt will be 31 (not that old for a G), but we would be smart to use that $$ elsewhere.  I think we need to plan on having Hunt on this team through 2026, unless he restructures, something I do not think serves the best long-term interests of the Panthers. Damien Lewis.  (28) Less money, but nearly the same situation.  If he becomes a post-June 1 cut after the 2026 season, we would save $19m.  One could argue that both Lewis and Hunt could be on the roster through 2027, and a lot depends on the QB situation.  Still, if I am GM, I take a look at the current situation at Guard.  Lewis has 3-4 good years left and has been very solid.  With only half his contract guaranteed, it makes sense to extend Lewis and cut Hunt. Jake Curhan…If you have been paying attention, he has been solid. In the long-term plans, this could be a lot more significant than it seems right now. Over the past few weeks, T Jake Curhan has been solid at RG.  He is 27.  I lock him down with a 4-year deal in the $8m-10m per range and make him my backup in 2026 (at 28) and starter in 2027 (at 29).       Guard Prognosis: Sign Curhan to a long-term deal, based on his performance at RG.  Extend Lewis for 2 years, keeping him as the RG  through 2029.  Trade Hunt now or release him after the 2026 season. Zavala is under contract through 2026 on a very team-friendly deal. He was better in 2024, fwiw, but those 2025 numbers are terrible.  Not sure we need a G in 2026 draft, unless we trade Hunt. (good luck with that).   CENTER Cade Mays. (26) Mays is entering his prime as an OL and he has played several interior OL positions, making his contributions valuable.  He is probably average to slightly below average as a center, but he needs a contract.  An ideal IOL backup, he still has upside and is not a liability at center.  He needs to improve on his run blocking, but for a center, that has a lot to do with his abilities to recognize stunts and call blocking assignments–understandable.  Pass blocking is good, fwiw.  He needs a 4-year deal to keep him on the roster, and signing him now might be wise.  Nick Samac (24).  It is noteworthy that the Panthers pulled up center Nick Samac (24) from the Ravens’ practice squad, who the Ravens were fairly high on, so maybe center is not as big a need as we think. I still think we should draft or sign a C at some point with the mindset of moving Cade Mays to a reserve IOL.   Austin Corbett (30)  meanwhile, the oft-injured G converted to center, is making $10m this season and 2026 is a voidable year.  He is probably gone.  He is having a better year than Mays in spot duty, but last season, Mays actually outperformed Corbett using the PFF data.     Center Prognosis:  Sign Mays to a long-term, reasonable contract (backup rate with starting incentives), allow Samac to compete for the job/backup job (I have no idea how good he is).  Draft a center in 2026.  Say “bye-bye” to IR Corbett.   TACKLE Icky Ekwonu (25) will see his salary double to about $17m in 2026, but I expect him to be re-signed to a long-term deal through the 2030 season.  If I am Morgan and I am not extending Young, I make that deal front-loaded Taylor Moton (31) has been solid, and his salary for 2026 ($21m) means that he will be our RT next season.  He is likely to be in Carolina through 2027, when he turns 33, but the salary will be $28m, with half guaranteed.  He has a low, voidable year in 2028 (age 34) at a reasonable $6m.   Brady Christensen (29).  Listed as a G, he is (to me) the epitome of a swing OT with the ability to backup OG, lowering the need to draft a G. He needs a deal, however, and if I am the Panthers, I give him a 3-year deal because his depth is valuable and he is playing well. Yosh Nijman (29). Nope. A pass pro grade of 46.7 gets your QB blue tented.  His contract expires at the end of the 2025 season.  We need to draft Moton’s future replacement and possible backup.  Let BC play behind Icky and provide G depth.  Time to groom the next RT.   Tackle Prognosis:  Give Ickey the deal he deserves (ouch) and lock him down.  Count on Moton being your RT for 2026 and probably 2027.  Re-sign BC and let him play swing T and provide G depth.  Draft a RT in the 2026 draft.    OVERALL:  The OL needs to manage the cap to sustain future growth, so the priority needs to be re-signing Curhan and planning for the Hunt departure. Re-sign Brady Christensen and Cade Mays to contracts of 3 years or so. Extend Lewis.  Lock Ickey down. Draft or sign a RT and C. Let Corbett and Nijman walk.  Lewis needs to restructure and Hunt needs to be gone before 2027. We lose the $10m Corbett salary and Nijman’s $3m, but Ickey’s salary goes up about $10m (5th year–unless he is signed to a long-term deal that absorbs some of that cost).  Lewis should be extended to save some cap room in 2026, but that $$ would go to the BC and Mays contracts. Curhan needs a deal because we need a proven commodity to replace Hunt down the road.  So the cap might increase for the OL in 2026 a bit, facilitating the Hunt release in 2027, which saves nearly $20m.  Of course, locking down Ickey now could make the 2026 cap more manageable.  With liabilities Corbett and Nijman gone (and the $13m they were paid), we can re-sign BC and Mays.  Lewis’ restructure could cover the first year of the Ickey deal and maybe Curhan will not be too expensive to re-sign.  If we could do this, our OL depth would be better and our future would be cheaper and brighter.   Urgency for 2026:   Tackle:  Low if we re-sign BC and draft a RT to develop behind Moton.   Guard: Low if we still have Hunt, Lewis, Curhan, and Zavala for 2026. Center: Medium urgency in that Mays has been decent and is entering his prime.  What do we have behind him?  Competition and depth needed.  (NOTE:  I think the depth positions need to be filled in the draft because we can't afford free agents in 2026.)
    • Isaiah Simmons is absolutely horrible. His change of direction is poor, but the most disturbing part about him is how physically weak he is for his size. He can get stiff armed by WRs and knocked to the turf.  Simmons will play OLB for us due to his height which can help in pass coverage. Keep in mind that he's terrible. 
    • Has he fumbled on a carry or is it just returns?
×
×
  • Create New...