Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game #4 Canes vs Rangers 7pm Puck Drop


Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I mean the kid did beat New York to clinch the division on the road so I’d give him a go.

I’m still not understanding why He was benched after a loss in Boston.  Maybe it’s the language barrier or I just still don’t understand hockey, but I thought the kid played great on the whole. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, TheCandyMan said:

I’m still not understanding why He was benched after a loss in Boston.  Maybe it’s the language barrier or I just still don’t understand hockey, but I thought the kid played great on the whole. 

You’re guess is good as mine, he definitely seemed to be on a short leash.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Raanta is tired.

I would like Freddie back, but not if it is too soon.  I also worry about shaking off the rust.

TDA hasn't been the same since he got injured.  He isn't posing the offensive threat he did earlier in the year.

All the talk of the Canes can't win on the road has gotten into the player's heads.  They have to rise above all the noise.

I'll say it time and again, the Canes have to beat the team in front of them and the refs.  The NHL wants a TB/NYR ECF.....people can believe what they want, but more viewers from large/rabid fanbase markets makes Bettman and the NHL happy.

#LetsGoCanes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...