Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game 6 Canes @ Rangers 8PM


Harbingers
 Share

Recommended Posts

As much blame as Raanta deserves, let's also give focus to our team scoring 2 goals in 7 periods on the road this series. At some point Aho, svech, and co need to step up and score even with raanta sucking.

Look at the oilers. Mike Smith let's in a goal from the other blue. Did they pack it in like we have every game on the road? No, they said fug it and scored another goal.

We just don't have any players with that mentality unfortunately

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PleaseCutStewart said:

As much blame as Raanta deserves, let's also give focus to our team scoring 2 goals in 7 periods on the road this series. At some point Aho, svech, and co need to step up and score even with raanta sucking.

Look at the oilers. Mike Smith let's in a goal from the other blue. Did they pack it in like we have every game on the road? No, they said fug it and scored another goal.

We just don't have any players with that mentality unfortunately

Also very true 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

Yeah I like rannta the person just not Raanta the goalie. I could have been in net last game and got us a dub that’s how dominant the team in front of him was. 

Can you say the same for games 1 and 2 this series and game 7 against Boston.

 

No, you can't. Raanta has had a bad game. Unfortunately our players have no care in the world to step up their play and look like they give 2 fugs out there.

Putting Freddie or Pyotr out there isn't changing that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Can you say the same for games 1 and 2 this series and game 7 against Boston.

 

No, you can't. Raanta has had a bad game. Unfortunately our players have no care in the world to step up their play and look like they give 2 fugs out there.

Putting Freddie or Pyotr out there isn't changing that

Untrue. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...