Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Canes Off-season Thread


Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

For those that are interested, this account has been calling everything we do.

Burns Trade

Pacioretty Trade

Tkachuk Interest

This tweet followed after by a verified insider…

Then the response…

Whoever this is has a hell of a source.

Interesting. I'll have to keep up with this one. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Very much an all in for a cup approach it would appear this season.... Wouldn't be shocked to see us acquire Kane.

Would take a helluva moved- he's under contract at $10.5M. The Canes would have to give up the farm for a 33-year old winger. Sure, he's a scorer, and he's averaging 70+ points a season over the last 5, but is he really worth it?  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

Would take a helluva moved- he's under contract at $10.5M. The Canes would have to give up the farm for a 33-year old winger. Sure, he's a scorer, and he's averaging 70+ points a season over the last 5, but is he really worth it?  

The Blackhawks are far from contention he is anther with 1 year remaining, I'd say witht them retaining 75% of his contract it wouldn't be as much as you think.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

The Blackhawks are far from contention he is anther with 1 year remaining, I'd say witht them retaining 75% of his contract it wouldn't be as much as you think.

The max retainment a team can do is 50%, the Canes would need to find a third team to eat the additional 25% but obviously they’d have to give assets to do so which is why I don’t think that’s likely.

Kane at 50% for an extended Necas and Gardiner at 50% should get it done. At the end of the day Kane is a free agent next year and is much older than Tkachuk so he shouldn’t pull nearly as much as extend Tkachuk got.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MillionDollarCam said:

The max retainment a team can do is 50%, the Canes would need to find a third team to eat the additional 25% but obviously they’d have to give assets to do so which is why I don’t think that’s likely.

Kane at 50% for an extended Necas and Gardiner at 50% should get it done. At the end of the day Kane is a free agent next year and is much older than Tkachuk so he shouldn’t pull nearly as much as extend Tkachuk got.

If you get a third party involved you can have the OG absorb 50% and the third party absorb another 50% see some of TBs rentals.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything I've seen from the Canes moves and moved they have attempted says they are making a push for the cup this season. 

 

MaxPac has one of the highest conversion rates in the leauge it wouldn't shock me to see him on line one Pac/Aho/Jarvis it also wouldn't shock me to see Jarvis move back to his natural C position and have Svech/Jarvis/Necas produce heavily as line 2.

Our PP should be much better already this season already.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

If you get a third party involved you can have the OG absorb 50% and the third party absorb another 50% see some of TBs rentals.

I mean that’s exactly what I said but you have to give up assets to do that, no one is going to take 25% for free, and if you go up to 50% then you are going to be giving up big time assets. The Canes aren’t going to give up Drury or Morrow for Kane. He’s a UFA after this year and the Canes can easily fit him in if the Hawks retain 50% as long as someone like Necas and Gardiner (50% retained) is going back the other way. There’s no need to give up picks and prospects to a third party for a player whose cap hit comes off the books at the end of the season.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MillionDollarCam said:

So reports are that our package for Tkachuk was built around Necas. Just a guess but I’m thinking it was probably Necas, Morrow, and a first.

With that said, the Canes seem keen on upgrading the forward position… I’d be shocked if Necas wasn’t moved in a package for a top six forward.

Makes me happy they are still working on the roster

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Wolves roster will currently consist of some sort of combination of the below players.

Forwards - Stefan Noesen, Malte StromwallMackenzie MacEachern, Lane Pederson, Jamieson Rees, Stelio Mattheos, Ryan Suzuki, Vasili Ponomarev, Noel Gunler, Blake Murray, Joseph LaBate (Wolves contract), Josh Melnick (Wolves contract)

Defensemen - Dylan Coghlan, William Lagesson, Max Lajoie, Cavan Fitzgerald, Ronan Seeley, Griffin Mendel

Goalies - Pyotr Kochetkov, Zach Sawchenko

Joey Keane, Jesper Sellgren, and Tarmo Reunanen have decided to go overseas.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...