Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Re: Last year's defense


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Mage said:

Panthers allowed the 8th fewest first downs in the NFL and led the league in shortest number of plays per drive allowed.  

The second part of this statement isn't necessarily a good thing. If you take into account that too many times last year it seemed teams had great field position and only needed a few plays to score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, poundaway said:

This stat explains the OP stat.

Expecting a D to stop all scoring, shows a lack of understanding of how football works.

Anyone who came away from watching our games and said we lost because of our D, must have slept through the 2nd and 3rd quarter.

 No one is expecting to stop all scoring, and few would expect a defense to hole a minor lead with no offensive support. However, anyone who came away thinking the defense was anything other than average at best must have only watched the first quarters as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Isn't that what we had?  A minor lead (first score) with no offensive support?

Often enough yes, which is why the stat is what it is but hardly the sole reason the team gave up 24 or more 10 times, 27 or more 8 times. With better offense the defense us still average at best and nowhere near the , which is the whole point. Nothing about it was genuine "#2 defense" and little has changed, so expect more average play this year but with perhaps a few closer scores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, poundaway said:

This stat explains the OP stat.

Expecting a D to stop all scoring, shows a lack of understanding of how football works.

Anyone who came away from watching our games and said we lost because of our D, must have slept through the 2nd and 3rd quarter.

It’s worthless to argue with them. Their logic has been disproven over and over again and they just keep repeating it. The Scot guy has been repeating that our defense started off games bad even though it’s been proven multiple times that we easily had a top 5 first quarter defense in literally every regard. 
 

As with everything now, people would rather be wrong the rest of their lives instead of putting their ego aside to change their mind once and admit they are wrong.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CamTheMan said:

It’s worthless to argue with them. Their logic has been disproven over and over again and they just keep repeating it. The Scot guy has been repeating that our defense started off games bad even though it’s been proven multiple times that we easily had a top 5 first quarter defense in literally every regard. 
 

As with everything now, people would rather be wrong the rest of their lives instead of putting their ego aside to change their mind once and admit they are wrong.

This isn't complicated - while 2021 was better than 2020, the unit was average at best against actual competition and claims that last year's defense was #2 are nonsense. Carolina's 2013 defense was #2. and that team did not have prolific offense, and 2015 was #6; are you and others really arguing that that group last year was comparable? I sincerely hope not.

With better offensive play and net minor additions to the defensive personnel, reasonable expectation is continued average performance with fewer points scored but expecting legit #2 defense is unrealistic. That's all that's being said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, KSpan said:

This isn't complicated - while 2021 was better than 2020, the unit was average at best against actual competition and claims that last year's defense was #2 are nonsense. Carolina's 2013 defense was #2. and that team did not have prolific offense, and 2015 was #6; are you and others really arguing that that group last year was comparable? I sincerely hope not.

With better offensive play and net minor additions to the defensive personnel, reasonable expectation is continued average performance with fewer points scored but expecting legit #2 defense is unrealistic. That's all that's being said.

We aren't claiming its a #2 defense... so  you are arguing with yourself on that one.  Hope you win.

The OP makes the pathetic attempt to blame our 10 lost leads on the D.  Its a laughable statement "at best" as you like you to say.

Edited by poundaway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, KSpan said:

This isn't complicated - while 2021 was better than 2020, the unit was average at best against actual competition and claims that last year's defense was #2 are nonsense. Carolina's 2013 defense was #2. and that team did not have prolific offense, and 2015 was #6; are you and others really arguing that that group last year was comparable? I sincerely hope not.

With better offensive play and net minor additions to the defensive personnel, reasonable expectation is continued average performance with fewer points scored but expecting legit #2 defense is unrealistic. That's all that's being said.

Nobody has said we are the second best defense in the league. Literally nobody has ever said that. What we are saying is that it’s laughable to try and convince anyone this was an “average at best” defense. They were 15th in points allowed per drive, which is their worst ranking in any stat and can easily be explained by the fact we were DEAD LAST in starting field position. Why are you people ignoring that and the fact our defense faced extreme high volume since our offense was so terrible. This isn’t rocket science.

 

Above average defense + Bottom 3 defense = Good efficiency stats and below average total volume stats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, poundaway said:

We aren't claiming its a #2 defense... so  you are arguing with yourself on that one.  Hope you win.

The OP makes the pathetic attempt to blame our 10 lost leads on the D.  Its a laughable statement "at best" as you like you to say.

 

3 minutes ago, CamTheMan said:

Nobody has said we are the second best defense in the league. Literally nobody has ever said that. What we are saying is that it’s laughable to try and convince anyone this was an “average at best” defense. They were 15th in points allowed per drive, which is their worst ranking in any stat and can easily be explained by the fact we were DEAD LAST in starting field position. Why are you people ignoring that and the fact our defense faced extreme high volume since our offense was so terrible. This isn’t rocket science.

 

Above average defense + Bottom 3 defense = Good efficiency stats and below average total volume stats

Plenty of people have thrown out that '#2 defense' nonsense all offseason as evidence of some major leap that will take place of there is better offense, and it's nonsense. Aside from that the stat still supports that Rhule has been an inept strategist and HC and that hasn't changed, so it's rational to expect more of the same until it's proven otherwise. With better offense the defense will clearly appear as average as it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, CamTheMan said:

It’s worthless to argue with them. Their logic has been disproven over and over again and they just keep repeating it. The Scot guy has been repeating that our defense started off games bad even though it’s been proven multiple times that we easily had a top 5 first quarter defense in literally every regard. 

As with everything now, people would rather be wrong the rest of their lives instead of putting their ego aside to change their mind once and admit they are wrong.

Ah yes, the old "declare victory and act like you've proven your point when you actually haven't even come close" tactic, a message board favorite 😆

Quick tip: Might help if you learn the difference between "first quarter" and "early on" (they're not synonymous).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KSpan said:

 

Plenty of people have thrown out that '#2 defense' nonsense all offseason as evidence of some major leap that will take place of there is better offense, and it's nonsense. Aside from that the stat still supports that Rhule has been an inept strategist and HC and that hasn't changed, so it's rational to expect more of the same until it's proven otherwise. With better offense the defense will clearly appear as average as it is.

Yes commentators and huddlers cite the #2 defense because we were 2nd in yards allowed, a commonly used stat to eval a D.  It apparently bothers you, so much that you argue it with people who don't even mention the stat.  Go argue it with them. 

This thread is discussing if the 10 lost leads can be blamed on the D and I call bullshlt.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Plenty of people have thrown out that '#2 defense' nonsense all offseason as evidence of some major leap that will take place of there is better offense, and it's nonsense. Aside from that the stat still supports that Rhule has been an inept strategist and HC and that hasn't changed, so it's rational to expect more of the same until it's proven otherwise. With better offense the defense will clearly appear as average as it is.

Pretty much.

Even the people who haven't thrown that out recently (likely because it actually has been shown to be ridiculous) still like to talk as if the defense last season was something special.

"Average at best" is a pretty good description, though I'm not even sure I'd give them that much credit.

People really need to learn to stop depending so much on stats and rankings. They don't mean jack.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CamTheMan said:

Nobody has said we are the second best defense in the league. Literally nobody has ever said that. What we are saying is that it’s laughable to try and convince anyone this was an “average at best” defense. They were 15th in points allowed per drive, which is their worst ranking in any stat and can easily be explained by the fact we were DEAD LAST in starting field position. Why are you people ignoring that and the fact our defense faced extreme high volume since our offense was so terrible. This isn’t rocket science.

 

Above average defense + Bottom 3 defense = Good efficiency stats and below average total volume stats

 

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is something that has irritated me for a while. I'm going to address his play during these "game winning drives," 8 of them apparently, clear up some nomenclature, and address some points specifically. The games in question.  Also responding to this  What is a Game Winning Drive? This is an undefined term and therefore can be whatever the person using it wants it to be. The term itself removes context from a result which lends itself to be used by people arguing in bad faith. Some people like to attribute every time Bryce is on the field in a situation like this to him "winning the game," or just kind of associating him with a "Game Winning Drive" and leaving it open ended. There's no criteria for what a GWD is. If you had a spectrum of what this could encompass it, on one end you'd have a single player being responsible, and on the other you'd have all 11. Put another way, a QB going 9/9 for 99 yards and rushing the final yard himself is on one end of the spectrum, and on the other is the blocking tight end who was just kinda there. Hey, he was on the field too.  For these purposes, I'm going to hedge and say a GWD is something you know when you see it. I'm not going to claim Bryce hasn't had one, but I'm absolutely not going to give him credit for every one of them. Reasonable people can disagree at the margins, but generally I think we'll be in accord more than not. I also want to look at the context of these, because I think we need to keep in mind how the team got to that position. There's a certain "mystique" about the term game winning drive. Like all of a sudden, when the game is on the line, the QB just turns it on and becomes a better player and blah blah blah. Nothing else matters because he Just Wins Games It neatly ignores the circumstances that led to a team needing a last second drive against some of the worst teams in the league, and this should be taken into consideration. This was an argument made in favor of Delhomme for years...until a certain game that we won't mention.  In reality, defenses are tired by the end of the game, defensive coordinators will generally give up yards in exchange for clock, and offensive playcallers will be more aggressive. That's really it.  But Fiz, why now? Why tonight? People are building this narrative about Bryce Young because it allows them to overlook the rest of his performance, his role in getting the team into whatever hole they're trying to crawl out of, and minimizing the contributions of everyone else (or assigning blame to players other than him) to make him look like he's better than he is/being let down. People in the national media with motivations I can only speculate on are doing this and it's irritating. Also it's very slow at work tonight and it's either this or reruns of ER.  I'll be looking at the final drives here (more or less) when the Panthers were in a position to win or tie. I'll also be adding some context as a I go. So lets just look at these.  2023 Houston at Carolina - 5/10 41 yds, FG  The Panthers drove to the Houston 44, then ran it 6 times in a row for the final 12 yards before the Texans started diving offsides. Panthers weren't just killing clock; Bryce had already taken one sack on the drive (six on the day!), and I don't think any of us feel like Pineiro had a 60 yarder in him in 2023. He did have 5 FG in him though, which is all the scoring the Panthers could muster. It was enough.  Game Winning Drive: eh, Bryce didn't really cover himself in glory here. If you think getting the team into range for a 60 yard attempt before letting the RB finish the job is a GWD, then we're going to have some problems. I'm generally kinda dubious of the whole "wow he set up a long range field goal for the win what a legend." Why yes early career Tom Brady was a fraud carried by Adam Vinatieri why do you ask  Atlanta at Carolina - 5/6 53 yds, GW FG Game Winning Drive: yeah, I think so. It was a miserable 9-6 win against the Desmond Ridder led Atlanta Falcons. Prior to this final drive, Bryce was a whopping 13/18 for 114 yds and the offense had managed 6 whole points. Hard for me to say here they weren't in the position to need a GWD because of how ineffective Bryce was. That said, I think it's fair he did this one on his own. Credit where credit's due little guy, you did it.  2024 New Orleans at Carolina - 1/4, 38 yds Game Winning Drive: not really. Panthers win 23-22. Sanders scored from 16 yards out on the ground, Carolina was only there because of a DPI (a theme with Bryce), Bryce took a sack on the 2 point conversion, and then the defense stopped the Saints afterwards. Prior to this Bryce had a very Bryce esque 15/22 133 1 Td 1 Int performance going so he was just kinda there.  Again, this is where context comes into play. Completing 1/4 passes does not "leading a game winning drive" make. If that's the dividing line, everyone on the field led a GWD, so the term becomes meaningless.  Carolina at Giants - 0/0  Game Winning Drive: no matter what a GWD is, it's certainly not this, and if anyone argues differently you can disregard them. Daniel Jones fumbled on the first play of overtime, Panthers ran a couple times and kicked the game winning FG. Prior to this, Bryce was terrible. Panthers were up 17-7 with 5:31 in the 3rd quarter, on the back of Chuba. From that point on, Bryce went 2/6 for 14 yards. Panthers had two 3 and outs and got just 2 first downs. Panthers overcame him here.  Arizona at Carolina - 0/0 Game Winning Drive: no. On the panthers second possession in overtime, Chuba ran it twice for 49 yards and a TD. On their first possession, Bryce completed a 1 yard checkdown, took a sack, and the Panthers punted after totaling -4 yards. Furthermore, Bryce couldn't convert a 3rd and 3 at the 2 minute warning up 3 points. Arizona got the ball back and tied the game.  Carolina at Atlanta - 5/5, 71 yards  Game Winning Drive: sure whatever have a day. For context, it's generally accepted in Atlanta sports media the defense was trying get the coordinator fired that day, which he was. I was at the game. I'm not saying the players had a conspiracy, but I'm not sure how it would look different if they did. but hey, as long as weird poo keeps happening against the Falcons, let it ride.  Miami at Carolina - 3/5, 45 yards, TD  Game Winning Drive: yes BUT. I don't want to re-litigate this. Briefly, the Dolphins have a historically bad defense, the Panthers were only trailing because of how badly Bryce played, the defense bailed the team out, and Rico was clearly the MVP. Trying to sneak this into a narrative about Bryce and his game winning drives is an attempt to hide how completely dogshit he was for most of the game. On second half drives to start, Bryce went.... 0/1 passing, took a sack, FG 2/3 passing, 18 yards, Delay of Game on Bryce, punt 2/2 passing, 16 yards, took a sack, punt  1/3 passing, 4 yards, punt  1/1 passing, 4 yds, 2 defensive penalties, 43 yd run by Rico, 1 yd TD run Absolutely dismal performance Dallas at Carolina - 3/6, 25 yards, FG  Game Winning Drive: Panthers had 34 yards rushing on this drive, and Rico rushed for more yards on the day than Bryce threw. People will want to point to the 7 yard slant to Renfrow, but that's one moment. Why do you need a 4th down conversion to kick a game winning FG against the worst defense in the league? The Renfrow catch is just as meaningful as the DPI (again) on 3rd and 7. Hard for me to say yeah Bryce gets credit for this and Rico doesn't. or Ryan Fitzgerald. People aren't going to be telling stories about where they were when Bryce got 25 yards passing to set up a 30 yard FG to beat the worst defense in the league.  Conclusion I'd say low end 3, high end 6 for what I'd actually credit Bryce for with having a game winning drive. Absolutely not for the Giants and Cardinals game. Saints game probably not.  As far as questioning which games need a GWD because of Bryce, I'd argue Miami, New York, 2023 Atlanta, and Houston definitely. League average QB play and you don't need the heroics. Bryce had multiple chances to seal the game against the Cardinals in 2024 and couldn't do it. The defense picked off the Cardinals late in the 4th quarter at their 11 yard line after the Panthers went 3 and out, including a classic Bryce check down short of the line to gain on 3rd.  About half of the time, it looks like these GWD, whomever is responsible for them, are happening in part because of what Bryce did or didn't do. I don't think league average QB play is too much to ask for. Panthers usually win these games despite of Bryce; he's an obstacle to be overcome.  Stats Taken in totality, in these situations Bryce's stats are  7 games 17/26 passing for 233, 1 TD  65% completion rating  13 ypc 8.9 ypa I'm not going to compare this to league average, I'm just going to point out you'd expect someone with 8 GWD to have more than 1 TD.  Other side of this  but what about the games in a similar situation where they DIDN'T win? Shouldn't we look at those games too? Maybe find ones where Bryce absolutely lost the game with a pick, or calling an audible into the wrong play, or spiking the ball with zero seconds on the clock after throwing into the middle of the field, or all of the turnover on downs? Maybe also go into some of the games that have been mythologized, like the Eagles game that ended on a turnover on downs where Bryce had 3rd and 4 in Eagles territory and couldn't get a first down? Yeah...someone should do that...
    • Best RB tandem in Panther history (at least for a few weeks)
×
×
  • Create New...