Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hornets Looking At Bringing Back Kemba Walker or Isaiah Thomas


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, MechaZain said:

He was brought in to replace Rozier bro using a lottery pick on LaMelo's backup would have been a waste. 

There's no plan though. We paid both Rozier and Martin. Mitch is going down the same path that got him sent packing from the Lakers.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, frankw said:

There's no plan though. We paid both Rozier and Martin. Mitch is going down the same path that got him sent packing from the Lakers.

Yep, agree with all this. Really have no idea what our plan is with our young guys. We always seem to sign players over them.

Rozier’s new deal starts next year, and it’s a hefty deal to say the least.

The Hornets will probably let Oubre walk next year and slide Martin to SF to be the backup for whoever is manning that position… but once again, this year is another wasted year where the only minutes Bouknight are getting are in Greensboro.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

In this case the Hornets let Bouknight 1.0 walk in FA so Bouknight 2.0 could do the same things.

That’s just being a poor manger of your assets though. At some point you have to get something for these players before letting them walk for nothing. Monk had the best year of his career last year and the Hornets have nothing to show for it. If they do the same with Bouknight then at some point the fans need to question what the plan is with our young guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MillionDollarCam said:

That’s just being a poor manger of your assets though. At some point you have to get something for these players before letting them walk for nothing. Monk had the best year of his career last year and the Hornets have nothing to show for it. If they do the same with Bouknight then at some point the fans need to question what the plan is with our young guys.

I’m hoping the plan is to stop drafting high-volume, undersized 2-guards who won’t play defense, honestly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, frankw said:

There's no plan though. We paid both Rozier and Martin. Mitch is going down the same path that got him sent packing from the Lakers.

They can coexist. Cody's a solid defender who can play 1-3 but he's not a shooter, he's depth. If he spends a significant portion of his time at the 2 we're in trouble. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

They can coexist. Cody's a solid defender who can play 1-3 but he's not a shooter, he's depth. If he spends a significant portion of his time at the 2 we're in trouble. 

 

If Kemba is brought back then Cody isn’t playing the 1. He did that at times last year when guys had injuries or covid but that all but stopped as soon as IT came in.

So you have five guys (Rozier, Martin, Hayward, Oubre, and Bouknight) for four rotational spots… the odd man out is Bouknight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Cam Lawter said:

Why are we always benching our 1st round picks or trading them away. I like Cody but damn, we don't even get to see the potential of Bouk and I highly doubt we'll see much of Williams. Don't even get me started on Duren since we are without Bridges now

It’s the Hornet way. They had rather play veterans to be mediocre verses being complete trash but letting the kids develop. Lottery picks are for suckers....Hornets moto. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Wanderlai said:

It’s the Hornet way. They had rather play veterans to be mediocre verses being complete trash but letting the kids develop. Lottery picks are for suckers....Hornets moto

Trading them for second round picks and then keeping those second round players over the lottery picks that we do have seems to be the game plan.

I just don’t understand the whole Martin contract… give Bouknight a chance to develop and if he doesn’t then draft another defensive two guard next year to replace him and move him out for some sort of compensation.

The Hornets asset managing is astounding.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cody Martin and James Bouknight are polar opposites as players. Martin doesn't have explosiveness, nor the lateral quickness and shot-creating ability Bouknight has, but Bouknight possesses 0% of Martin's defensive intensity, desire and ability to close out on wings. Having one does not preclude a team from having both. 

If Bouknight will ever consider trying on defense, he'll be in a far better spot. Playing players based on draft position is not the smartest thing, unless you want to field a college team in the NBA who'll bite and foul on every pump fake, get beat backdoor like nobody's business, and take 65 stepback threes every game. You do, in fact, need people who play defense, like Martin and Mark Williams.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Cody Martin and James Bouknight are polar opposites as players. Martin doesn't have explosiveness, nor the lateral quickness and shot-creating ability Bouknight has, but Bouknight possesses 0% of Martin's defensive intensity, desire and ability to close out on wings. Having one does not preclude a team from having both. 

If Bouknight will ever consider trying on defense, he'll be in a far better spot. Playing players based on draft position is not the smartest thing, unless you want to field a college team in the NBA who'll bite and foul on every pump fake, get beat backdoor like nobody's business, and take 65 stepback threes every game. You do, in fact, need people who play defense, like Martin and Mark Williams.

That’s fine but don’t waste your assets on the bench and let them walk for nothing when the time comes. Gary Payton is just as good of a player as Martin and probably the closest comparison that there is to Martin in the NBA and Golden State will be replacing him with Moody next year. Moody was selected two spots after Bouknight. Point being you eventually have to let the guys you draft try. If you don’t then it’s a revolving door of young players that you lose for nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

That’s fine but don’t waste your assets on the bench and let them walk for nothing when the time comes. Gary Payton is just as good of a player as Martin and probably the closest comparison that there is to Martin in the NBA and Golden State will be replacing him with Moody next year. Moody was selected two spots after Bouknight. Point being you eventually have to let the guys you draft try. If you don’t then it’s a revolving door of young players that you lose for nothing.

I get that, but I'm not very optimistic that Bouknight will turn out to be someone who'll make you forget Cody Martin. He's probably destined to be an eighth-man microwave to use when you're down 12 and he'll either shoot you back into it, or build the deficit to 25.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the way it should be. the way it has to be.  when you get a rookie (no matter where he is drafted), you don't expect him to play like a vet or even get a grasp on NFL offenses like a vet. if you intend to have him running the offense, you build the offense around what they do and what clicks.  not Young's fault, but he was sold as someone who would be a rookie but has the mind of a seasoned vet. guess what...he wasn't. reich and "his" crew had no idea how to work with a rookie QB or groom one. they thought they knew, but they didn't and it was obvious in the lack of plan they had for him. their plan was to treat him like he was a seasoned vet. even with that, i don't think they had any clear vision not just with Bryce, but with the offense. There was no cohesion between all the various coaches. nothing fit together and reich wasn't a strong enough leader to pull it all together.  i like the approach of starting over with the fundamentals and i think it's good for any new coaching staff or new QB to a system. you don't know what to expect so you start from the beginning to make sure you're on the same page from the beginning. and as you get more used to each other, you learn what works, what could really work well, and what won't work and you form the playbook around that. contrast that with chud who had been working on a playbook for years and just wanted to use it regardless of whether the situation called for it or the personnel he had (on the team or even on the field) fit what he wanted to call.   or last year when we had coaches from completely different backgrounds trying to put something together that was supposed to be a blend of what each brought to the table, but just ended up being a sloppy predictable mess that didn't fit anyone on the team, QB, WRs, and OL.
    • I've always been super pumped up for the upcoming season but I've never been so uninterested in a new season. After six years under Dipper I've been left at end of season drunken and wallowing in my own piss... not invested in the team right now but hope Canales and Morgan make a good team together...
    • There's no discussion anymore, it's just a circle jerk about how bad Bryce is, and it got old a while ago. 
×
×
  • Create New...