Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This is one way to solve the battery issue for some electric vehicles


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

It'll take government regulation to make it feasible or every manufacturer will make their own proprietary battery type that won't work with other makes. Basically like they do in the battery powered tool market and how cell phone charging ports worked back in the day before regulations forced them to be standardized.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It'll take government regulation to make it feasible or every manufacturer will make their own proprietary battery type that won't work with other makes. Basically like they do in the battery powered tool market and how cell phone charging ports worked back in the day before regulations forced them to be standardized.

Yep. We can probably expect that sort of regulation in another 40 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It'll take government regulation to make it feasible or every manufacturer will make their own proprietary battery type that won't work with other makes. Basically like they do in the battery powered tool market and how cell phone charging ports worked back in the day before regulations forced them to be standardized.

Unless government regulate batteries 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a massive housing affordability issue and now we want EV charging stations included in new construction driving up costs even more when EVs are still a very tiny percentage of the vehicles on the road? That's asinine.

If you have an EV and you want to add a charging station, then do it. Seems simple enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PanthersATL said:

2-3 minutes for a car-sized battery to recharge is physically impossible

 

Another article about a Chinese car that charges to 80% in 8 minutes but not going to post them all. Currently not possible and physically impossible are different things

Screenshot_20220826-193214_Chrome.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • or you could call him Bomanicious   I'm going with King Tet
    • T-Mac put up good numbers for 3 consecutive seasons on teams without a good QB situation, and in an environment where T-Mac got game planned against weekly and still performed. Teams threw all kinds of defensive coverages against T-Mac, and he still found ways week in and week out to contribute at a high level. XL was basically a 1-year wonder. Doesn't mean he cant be great (and I think him & T-Mac will compliment each other well), but i think T-Mac is the more polished of the 2 right now. This certainly isn't a perfect comparison, but I hope XL & T-Mac can approximate what we had with Smitty & Moose (Although i think T-Macs ceiling is higher than Moose and XLs ceiling is lower than Smitty). Both those guys were multiple Pro Bowlers and even All-Pro. T-Mac & XL have a long way to go to actually being comparable, but the potential is there. And regardless of how this season turns out, you can actually see a strategic plan being executed. On paper, I think this offensive roster has as much talent as any Panthers team since 2017. Defense is still a question mark, and it's unrealistic to think we will go from being historically bad to great in 1 year, but based on historical and statistical data, we stand a much better chance of turning the defense around in 1 year than the offense. I still want us to potentially add at S, CB, and ILB, but this roster is exponentially better than the roster heading into the 2023 season. Which still begs the question of how & why the team thought they were in a good position to trade all the way up. Regardless, it's in the past, and while the past 2 years have mostly sucked, we are strategically in a much better position than we have been in years. This is easily the best WR group since 2020 IMO (Moore, Anderson, Samuel). I'm super excited about what T-Mac can bring to this offense and team, and I'm really hoping we continue to build off where we ended last year offensively, and hopefully we've made enough improvements on defense to be competitive. I've also been vocal for the most part in supporting BY9. He came into an awful situation and to a team that was in no position to make such a trade.   Still, this is Year 3. And this is a team that IMHO has both the talent & depth on offense to score and score a lot. Most QBs that ever amount to anything are competing by Year 3. There are no excuses for the offense not to perform. I think BY9 knows full well what's riding on this year in terms of his long term future.  And I think T-Mac is a massive piece in helping Bryce and the team get over the hump and back into playoff contention.  
×
×
  • Create New...