Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is this Not Concerning?


Castavar
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Castavar said:

Saw this tweet and thought it was interesting

Shouldn't this raise a red flag? Won't this make us easier to predict when teams start getting tape on us?

You don't need tape to beat us. They are still running basic stuff. Or heaven forbid I hope they are. For whatever reason Rhule or McAdoo or both thought it was...hell I don't know what they were thinking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well we don't really have a FB. We have talent at TE/needed the chip on Garrett. We have the depth at wr to keep fresh legs running 3 wide consistently. We have DJ and CMC who can line up anywhere.

We varied the formations a bunch. People get too hung up on personnel. It's not that big a deal. Only a problem when you fail to execute plays.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its true that McAdoo loved using the same packages in NY.

 A lot of our stumbles early didn't seem to be package related.  The fumbled snaps and holding penalties killed drives.   

On O it looks like we weren't prepared enough.  Rhule's excuse was we only had our QB for month.   Which is true.   But if that's the reason, how many weeks is enough time fix it?


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, lightsout said:

Well we don't really have a FB. We have talent at TE/needed the chip on Garrett. We have the depth at wr to keep fresh legs running 3 wide consistently. We have DJ and CMC who can line up anywhere.

We varied the formations a bunch. People get too hung up on personnel. It's not that big a deal. Only a problem when you fail to execute plays.

True.  Package<> Formation and we varied formation and players on Sunday.

In NY, I think McAdoo even used the same formation though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...