Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Team Stat Rankings through Week 1


Pantha-kun
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

It's one game, so I am not going to draw many conclusions and certainly not many beyond decisions and performances in one game. 

It's just one game, but it's kinda not.

We saw the run defense be garbage through most of last year. That it starts off looking the same is...discouraging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Waldo said:

They had 8 sacks and we had 0. Ugh, Riddick may just indeed be missed.

Looking for droped passes. I remember 2 for the Browns but wanted to see how that played into the passing game and pass D. Couldn't find it tho.

 

Honestly, I started feeling thus way last year, but I feel like Week 1 of this season confirmed it...  YGM seems like a bust.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Honestly, I started feeling thus way last year, but I feel like Week 1 of this season confirmed it...  YGM seems like a bust.

the whole D line besides Burns seems like a bust. And Burns isn't as good as people say he is. Its been years and hes the king of "Almost got it." Ive seen him whiff on so many sacks and that stupid play of him hugging Brisetts leg while Brisset just throws the ball away got me fuming. Burns is a decent DE but he's no super star. And everyone else on the dline is a god damn bum. 

Burns would be a perfect #2 DE if we had a bonifide #1 Peppers type on the other side. 

Edited by Pantha-kun
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's just one game, but it's kinda not.

We saw the run defense be garbage through most of last year. That it starts off looking the same is...discouraging.

Yep, like I said, I am not looking for a huge move toward the middle in that rating, unfortunately.  We entered this game with it as a concern, the results confirmed that concern (or made it a fear), and the results Sunday would have been worse had the Browns committed to the run for the stretch where they seemed to confuse Brissett with Rodgers.  Our opponent Sunday could abuse us again in that area.

If we are walking away with any conclusions from week 1, it is that this specific area of concern in genuine.  Nor do I think Snow has any answers, and there may not be any good ones on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Pantha-kun said:

They were officially credited with 4 sacks. Myles Garret lead the team with 2 sacks with 4 other Cleveland defenders recording a 0.5 sack

Lol my bad. It was their preseason stats. Tuesday and lots of stuff still not updated. Good catch, I was like where the hell did some of those come from. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Darrell Jackson would be a fantastic pickup for us, I think he could replace 80% of what A’Shawn gave us last year. With more passing rush upside going forward in the future, I’m a big proponent of large framed defensive tackles. Pairing Derrick Brown with another 6’5 35inch arm length DT would be so fun to watch. Let’s continue being huge in the middle, allow our linebackers to flow to the ball uninterrupted.
    • Fully agree that the best thing to do is ignore them, which takes a away their thrill of thinking they got to you.
    • I agree with you on the pick of Thienemen in the first. I think he will still be there and he's a smart, fast and sturdy player. He's who we need back there. In the second, I like Rodriguez over Golday. I agree that off the ball linebackers are desperately needed here, even with our great FA pick up. I think with our third pick, we're going to dip into OT territory instead of the D-line. While I agree that we need another disruptor at the point of attack that is stout enough to just stonewall a center and a guard at the same time, we've got a shaky and expensive O-line at the present that is just about to age out of the game. I think we snag Blake Miller out of Clemson here and give him a year behind Moton to learn and put some weight and strength on. He can also jump right in and play right guard at any time. Also, and this might sound crazy, but anyone who has put up with multiple seasons at Clemson will be able to take the heat and humidity of training camp at the start of the season and early games against the NFCSouth.  Beyond that, your guess is as good as mine. We do need that QB for competition and realistically to study for back-up. Luke Altmyer out of Illinois seems to fit the mold of the point guard type QB that they want from Bryce. That'd make an apples to apples situation that could make coaching and game planning easy. On the other hand North Dakota State's Cole Payton could be an intriguing choice as well as a big dual threat guy. Both could be there for our fourth pick or both could be gone. Will QBs continue to slide this season like last? Who knows? 
×
×
  • Create New...